The fact-checkers who flagged Paul Thacker's British Medical Journal article about a Pfizer subcontractor for Facebook admitted they police narrative, not fact.
Read by Jared Moore.
Original text version published 2/1/2022:
Find TK To Go on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Listen to This Article: The British Medical Journal Story That Exposed Politicized "Fact-Checking"
Gotta say I love this feature of having the articles read. I have a lot of walking / bike transit time during the week and this way I can enjoy Matt's writing without getting hit by a car. Thanks!
How is being dishonest about medication testing results that end up killing people any different from murder for hire? Murder for hire is murder this person and you get paid whereas this is get paid for what amounts to shooting into a crowd. And as this is a crime requiring lost of thought and planning and calculation of risks and rewards why not make it a crime in which the death penalty and/or mandatory minimum life sentences so that those calculating will have to consider how much 'their' life is worth since they are, in fact, calculating how much another's life may cost. Same moral reasoning would apply to any product that might result in death and in which corporate employees figure in wrongful death costs. just saying if you calculate other's death from your actions you will be held to calculate your own. A variant of the golden or silver rule if you calculate about other's mortality..... fill in the rest.