373 Comments
User's avatar
Halsey Burks's avatar

If I can’t deploy service members with diabetes because I can’t guarantee insulin to them, how the hell am I supposed to guarantee hormones? They’re nondeployable…therefore not fit for winning our nation’s wars.

Brent Nyitray's avatar

You can't serve if you have depression or anxiety either.

MajorSensible's avatar

Or have sleep apnea and need a CPAP machine.

Larry Cable's avatar

Sleep apnea is not a disqualifying condition if you are already in the service. Not having one is life threatening.

There are a lot of things that will disqualify you at MEPS that doesn't stop you from re-enlisting. HBP would keep you from enlisting, you can continue to serve if it develops with you are still in.

MajorSensible's avatar

Thanks, it’s been over 10 years but when I was in, Obstructive Sleep Apnea that required a CPAP machine could make you non-deployable. I participated in at least two boards (MEB/MRB) to review deployability for individuals with sleep apnea and other conditions.

Strovenovus's avatar

How is ability to serve determined with regard to depression or anxiety? Is that a case-by-case evaluation?

Marie Silvani's avatar

Towards the end of Vietnam’s war, my middle brother was drafted and released because he had flat feet

Shelley's avatar

My oldest brother was drafted in 1969 and released because of high blood pressure.

John Rogitz's avatar

People with disqualifying depression or anxiety cannot serve. If an individual member presents symptoms of such, he is terminated on a case by case basis.

Transgender people cannot serve. If an individual member presents symptoms of such, he is terminated on a case by case basis.

rob Wright's avatar

I've got it, the perfect solution. Put them all in the same unit, and they can be part of the "protest brigade". We'll send them around the world to our enemies, capitals. And they can scream and yell on their sidewalks out in front. They are extremely good at that.

BillS's avatar

What do you think is happening right now?

rob Wright's avatar

Yea, but that's against us!!

Jan's avatar

Maybe add a Pride Parade in all its garishness and the attendant depravity.

rob Wright's avatar

This is why I love America. We're such grand deep thinkers & people of action. Matter of fact, let's get all the victims groups together and form their own separate service branch. Nobody would want to touch us on the battlefield. We need a good catchy name for this branch. Come on people help me out here?

rob Wright's avatar

I've already got the marketing hook. Instead of Army's "Be all you can be", the new branch will use "Be what you want to be".

Steve Mumford's avatar

It seems to me that the cohesion of the platoon in combat is the only truly important metric in the entire issue.

I think that the psychological issues involved in transitioning to and hormonally maintaining a transgender status would be neither useful nor appropriate in the intensely high-keyed, macho world of 30 line soldiers or Marines in combat.

This is a misguided attempt to foist cutting-edge culture issues on an institution that depends on long-established military tradition for its effectiveness.

In combat, diversity does not equal strength; cohesion does.

Jan's avatar

Are there many born women transgender men signing up for combat units or services? Curious.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

Nicolas Talbott is pictured with the headline to this article.

Secret Squirrel's avatar

The we larger point is that exclusions for medical reasons is not anything new, which means it is not targeted discrimination without proper basis.

mary thompson-leary's avatar

For every one person actually fighting there are nine other people in support positions. Diabetes should be no issue. During Vietnam, a police action not a war, McNamara's Morons made up the bulk of the fighting troops. Very little was disqualifying and certainly not being other than heterosexual in one's proclivities. If you support my ability to fight I don't care who, or what, your interests include.

Phony Doc (Ph.D.)'s avatar

McNamara's "Project 100,000" personnel--cruelly referred to as "McNamara's Morons"--were soldiers who scored in Mental Category IV on the AFQT. Before 1966, a soldier had to be in Mental Category III or above in order to serve.

As a historian and Vietnam combat Vet, I can vouch for the fact that Cat IVs did not make up the "bulk" of our warfighters in the combat arms.

Lis's avatar

When 50,000 people die it’s a war. And are you calling the soldiers that went to Vietnam by way of draft morons? If so, you’re an ass.

Steve Mumford's avatar

Not my experience as a civilian combat artist in Iraq and Afghanistan. Soldiers have to be able to bond as a unit; there’s no room for psychological weakness or narcissistic personalities in war-time.

While some trans people may be psychologically healthy, a whole-army policy would invariably bring in many unbalanced individuals.

This is progressive politics butting in to places it doesn’t belong.

Mike R.'s avatar

Transgender"ism" is just one instance of the capture and distortion of all topics of serious social, political and financial concern vital to the citizens of the American Republic by, generally speaking, the propagandist surveillance state bureaucratic MSM, minions of the misandrist feminist Marxist ("woke") DEI and the Davos/CCP NGO wielding billionaire oligarchy. The point (my opinion) is chaos and prevention of the healthy truth/fact based solutions oriented conversation that would create a stable truth/fact based human American reality. The perps don't give a f'k. It's for all practical purposes a psyop. The RACKET effort to "timeline" factual reality and remove manipulation and knee jerk hysteria is affirmation of how powerful truth/fact based journalism can be.

I hoped for an even handed approach to our Republics problems but after six decades of extreme social engineering, financial high jinks and Marxist iconoclasm I don't see how any President could avoid appearing extreme in confronting the disease. And it is a disease. There is no question that many so called gay or transgendered people could serve the military with honor and dignity but, like our Republics national conversation, the point is chaos and subversion. The real "war" is on the American psyche and the creation of a state of manipulatable psychic/spiritual anomie where "everything means everything and nothing means anything". The walking wounded are everywhere. American infrastructure, her social institutions and economy aren't in collapse by accident. (A million dollar classroom that can't teach a child to read but instills him with self-hatred while destroying his culture and history?) Again: ANOMIE.

Behind the psyop the theft of labor, pension funds and

natural resources feed numbered accounts and builds bunkers for political grifters and the vicious billionaire cliques perping the grift.

We the People are the last free people standing. There is the Republic, the Constitution and the free citizen. Everything else is psyop.

John Duffner's avatar

Shipboard enlisted berthings do not afford much privacy. What are we to tell the female sailors if they don't care to bunk with someone who hasn't had "her" plumbing changed?

Mickel Knight's avatar

That's cute, you're acting like the rights of people with uteruses matter in these things. We're all equal, it's just that some groups are more equal than others.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

Please explain U.S. Navy Commander Emily “Hawking” Shilling. She's mentioned in the article. There's even a video.

Phony Doc (Ph.D.)'s avatar

Fighter pilots are "loners." The problems stem from units in which members serve in close proximity to others such as rifle squads and artillery gun and armor tank crews.

The lack of privacy and tensions that arise when members of the team can't "pull their weight" are a deterrent to cohesion and readiness.

Airish's avatar

Thirty year Army veteran here. I can assure you that not a single solitary military commander in the history of the world has ever thought, “having transgender soldiers on my roster is going to improve my unit’s readiness.” These are always going to be problems that drain attention away from what is actually important. Some dude wanting to be a chick should do so on his own time, not the military’s. Sorry to be a “bigot,” I guess. But it’s absolutely the truth.

Madjack's avatar

Not a bigot. A rational human

P.S.'s avatar

Logical is not bigotry..

TeeJae's avatar

Also on his own DIME, not the taxpayers'.

ann & stanley's avatar

I think if you let the population of the USA vote on this they would agree with you.

T.K.'s avatar

Some dude wanting to be a chick should do it on his own time, in a private, consenting, adults-only situation. No one has the right to deceive the public about what sex they are, whether entering the military or entering a female-only space like a barracks or a public bathroom.

nedweenie's avatar

And that is the final conclusion that will be reached on all the current trans nonsense: you do not have the right to fraudulently impersonate the opposite sex out in public. Human society runs on a shared, objective reality. A sex based reality. The mentally ill cannot be give the privilege to flout that and create chaos for the majority.

BookWench's avatar

That is not bigotry; that is common sense.

Loafergirl's avatar

Not a bigot, you’re talking the security of our nation 🇺🇸

clockworkcatcher's avatar

Please explain U.S. Navy Commander Emily “Hawking” Shilling. She's mentioned in the article. There's even a video.

Airish's avatar

Explain what? "Emily" is a man who decided to "identify" as a woman. He learned to fly an aircraft as a man. He sort of became a poster boy for the Biden administration, I suppose. If your point is that you can fly an aircraft through mental illness, then I guess you've made it.

John Duffner's avatar

Deployability is still the main issue. O-5s often get their own staterooms on the boat which would obviate some concerns, but continuous hormone treatment probably can't be guaranteed at sea.

Mike Hamilton's avatar

Transgender = Psychotic! There is no place for psychotic people in the military! This is NOT rocket science.

Mike Hamilton's avatar

Language changes but biology doesn't. Genes are pesky things. If your "competent" psychiatrist confirmed you are correct about your delusions, he is participating in what is referred to in psychiatry as a "folie a deux". You should probably get a new psychiatrist and so should he.

BookWench's avatar

Exactly.

Affirming the delusion that a man is actually a woman is just as dumb as affirming the delusion of an anorexic that she really does need to take off a few more pounds, so she should fast for another day or two.

Jan's avatar

Excellent point. I had an eating disorder as a young woman. It’s is a mental disorder that was also expressed in a negative way in other areas of my life—not just my body.

Mike Hamilton's avatar

Sorry. Gender = sex. You can't change the language just to fit your your delusion. Recent corruption of the language and definitions to fit people's delusions does not change the reality that there are only 2 sexes and 2 genders and they are equivalent terms. Reality is a bitch. Sorry, hope you still find me charming.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

Hello! I'm transgender, and I'm not psychotic. Thanks for being such a charmer!

Mike Hamilton's avatar

Well I'm going to be a little more charming. I practiced medicine for over 50 years. If you believe that you are something that you are not, you are delusional. Delusions are a psychiatric condition. Have you been evaluated by a competent psychiatrist?

Nathan Bennett's avatar

Sorry you have gender dysphoria, but your sex and gender are what you were born with and can't be changed. You can identify as whatever you like, good for you! I'm sure you get a lot of attention.

P.S.'s avatar

And attention is precisely what they crave.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

I have indeed been evaluated by a competent psychiatrist! Do you realize that sometimes what's between someone's ears doesn't match what's between their legs? Do you realize that gender expression is a social construct? Do you realize that transgender people have existed as long as civilization has? Western history and literature are littered with examples.

TWC's avatar

The issue of 'not matching' in btwn your ears does not define, nor 'make' anyone, trans. This is a term that has no meaning. And no...trans ppl have NOT existed throughout history, as there is no such thing. We have to discuss this issue honestly, starting with acknowledgement that the current iteration of 'trans' is not an actual thing; and that it is being used as a proxy to engage in a political, cultural, and philosophical assault on Reality.

Principles vs Tribes's avatar

Left-wing imbeciles always think that the reason people disagree with them is that we haven't heard their propaganda before, and all they should need to do is recite their delusional talking points at us and we'll be convinced to align with them.

This is yet another delusion.

Mike Hamilton's avatar

Sorry. Gender = sex. You can't change the language just to fit your your delusion. Recent corruption of the language and definitions to fit people's delusions does not change the reality that there are only 2 sexes and 2 genders and they are equivalent terms. Reality is a bitch. Sorry, hope you still find me charming.

P.S.'s avatar

Yes I realize there have been mentally disturbed people since the beginning of time.

BookWench's avatar

Do you realize that you do not need a gynecologist?

Do you realize that you can still have prostate issues?

STEVE WILLIE's avatar

I don't care if you want to get your dick chopped-off at your own expense, but that is not the way it works, or even close. Whether in the military or civilian healthcare system, we are effectively on the same health care system now. We all paid so you can chop your dick off (or sew one on). That is disgusting. I once met the voice coach for Washington State employees who were getting "gender-affirming" care. She was the one who taught men to speak like women..... at tax-payer expense.... and I am sure that only adds up to about 1% of the total cost. This is a free country, so you should be allowed to wear lipstick and put on a dress if you want. Now you owe us all a refund. You should be DOGE'd.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 25, 2025
Comment deleted
Marie Silvani's avatar

Are you in the military

T.K.'s avatar

What makes you "transgender?"

clockworkcatcher's avatar

Merriam-Webster defines transgender as of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity differs from the sex the person was identified as having at birth. I fit that definition.

BookWench's avatar

Because you are delusional.

I have read about a lot of people throughout history who thought they were Napoleon, or one of the Romanovs, but that didn't make it so.

BookWench's avatar

Then you should not be in the military.

Paul Jackson's avatar

I’m so bored with this nonsense. No human being in the entire history of humanity has ever changed gender, by which the proponents of this rubbish mean biological sex. The fact that in my homeland, Britain, it took a Supreme Court decision to confirm the blindingly bloody obvious that XX is female and XY is male which has now caused the need for bloody great big chunks of policy to be rewritten so that women can be treated as women rather than being invaded by men masquerading as women. It’s no wonder that other nations which are not as liberal or demented as us have been passing legislation to prevent this insanity from infecting their populace. In what abhorrent culture is it perfectly OK to excise the perfectly healthy breasts and, sometimes, the perfectly healthy uterus of a young woman despite the fact that the victim exhibits no physical symptoms of an illness and then call that treatment; the same applies to excising the perfectly healthy testes

Paul Jackson's avatar

Fidnt finish, the perfectly healthy testes of young men and boys. In any normal society those medical professions carrying out these brutal mutilations would be prosecuted for, among other things, performing unnecessary surgery. This is not gender affirming, it’s the exact opposite.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 25, 2025
Comment deleted
Frank A's avatar

"Will run rampant, driven by individual desire generates suffering after suffering, where there is no escape. At least not in this place. But within. We have to liberate ourselves from our own unchecked desire and self grasping to find peace."

+1! Hopefully humanity will awaken to and embrace that some day.

BillS's avatar

Bottom line is, do you want people with mental problems in the military?

clockworkcatcher's avatar

There's no shortage of current and former military members who have "mental problems" and are not transgender.

Nathan Bennett's avatar

Not every member of the military has mental problems. Every "transgender" person does. That's the difference.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

It is true that a lot of transgender people struggle with mental illness. Being part of a vulnerable, marginalized community that is constantly demonized by very loud and powerful voices proclaiming that we're sub-human does take its toll after a while.

Marie Silvani's avatar

There’s not a claim you’re subhuman. Be who you want to be. We just don’t want be part of your crusade and you all demand that we participate

Victoria Bell's avatar

Trans persons being "vulnerable, marginalized, demonized, etc. sounds like the perfect fit for a job that requires selfless dedication and bravery. I'll fight for your right to live the way you choose, but not to distract and possibly endanger the fighting men and women's military missions..

BillS's avatar

To be clear, I absolutely do not condone hating, or otherwise degrading transgenders. It is usually a sign that they experienced severe trauma as a child. They need to be treated with understanding and therapy. Enabling their delusion, however is not helpful to them or the rest of society.

BookWench's avatar

Poor, poor pitiful trans!

Y'all just want to live your lives and be left alone -- except that you never stop screaming about how precious you are, and how we need to tolerate your presence everywhere -- regardless of the threat you pose to real women, and the stupidity of having you in the military.

Nathan Bennett's avatar

I didn't say you're subhuman...I said you have mental problems.

Brandy's avatar

No taxpayer funding should go to facilitate sex change surgeries. Women aren't even allowed to have their breasts reconstructed after breast cancer in many cases. This is a cosmetic procedure. I can't believe we are here. In insane world. Most transgender people I've personally dealth with are extremely aggressive men. Not all. But my personal experience is that they are mentally ill.

Art's avatar

This stuff wasn’t on anyone’s radar in 2015 when the Obama administration quietly dropped into into the military. All us normies were commuting to work, coming home tired, and tending to our families. Next thing we know our kids are being led into the school library for drag queen story hour. Now it’s become institutionalized, normalized by entertainment media, and it’s taking all kinds of energy to course correct. And we’ve even had several dark years where normies were getting fired from their jobs for “incorrect” usage of pronouns.

Brandy's avatar

Just completely insane that you can't go about your life in this country without assigning at least one person per family to keep up with everything, which is a 14 hour a day job. Believe me, I am assigned. I wish I never had to read another story in my life but look what happens. So sickening.

nedweenie's avatar

Never forget: Pritzker Big Pharma money put Obama in the White House and he returned the favor by putting radical gender identity ideology into federal policy.

P.S.'s avatar

Yes they are & they are a danger to women & children.

BookWench's avatar

Of course they're mentally ill!

The best illustration of "toxic masculinity" is all the angry, delusional trans females online.

Michael Bellomo's avatar

as someone that was removed from the military for depression and other issues, i can confidently say (having not yet read this article, but thought about this topic deeply), there is no place for this issue in the military

Orenv's avatar

We are very far removed from what war could be. Isolated, far from front lines with little or no support. Lack of sleep, lack of food, lack of medicines. People dying all around you just from the environment. The last thing you need is people who require extra support just to function. Support that may never get there. Would the lack of hormone treatments result in a psychotic break? If it is supposedly "needed", it would seem that would indeed be the case. In our recent wars, there have been McDonalds in the actual theater of battle. This works when you are fighting vastly inferior forces. What happens in a world war against a peer opponent? Is that when you cull those who cannot function out?

I get it that in a global war, even on the home front, people contribute. Every little bit counts. But that doesn't make sense in theater where there are no ADA accommodations. You never know what the next battlefield will look like. On a simpler note, if a person is non-deployable, they hold a billet in a non-deployable space. What we in the Navy called "shore duty". Deployable sailors get billets of "shore duty" as a respite from being constantly at sea. If those billets are full, there is no respite for the war fighters. I was in the Navy when they first brought women onboard support ships. I was on one of those and our first cruise was like an episode of The Love Boat. For another 18 years, I did some active and reserve duty before retiring. During several of my 2 weeks of active reserve duty, I noticed practically the entire staff in the personnel dept on base were pregnant women. Pregnant women are not very deployable..., but it is one of those things (FYI Justice Jackson) that happens to women sometimes.

The military is a war fighting machine. It doesn't need to be a place where every social experiment is carried out, and everyone gets a trophy. They can do that in the State Dept. Otherwise, why not have child soldiers? I hear their tiny fingers are good for cleaning the barrels of rifles. We could try that for a decade or two to perform a study before making any hasty conclusions....

Frank A's avatar

"The military is a war fighting machine. It doesn't need to be a place where every social experiment is carried out, and everyone gets a trophy." End of discussion! There are many other ways to serve one's country outside of the military, but some must have it THEIR way - the antithesis of military participation.

Orenv's avatar

Ha ha. My drill instructor called us "Burger King" in boot camp. Needless to say, it didn't go our way...

Lis's avatar

Cogent and clear. Thanks for this.

5JimBob's avatar

This isn’t about sex or even about being transgender. It’s about power. People with gender dysphoria are being used by postmodern semanticists to make the same point O’Brien did to poor Winston in 1984. “I tell you Winston, reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else.” Power is being able to make someone agree with or go along with something they don’t actually believe, initially out of fear or a desire to be agreeable. But do it long enough and it becomes true belief which then becomes inseparable from reality. O’Brien continues; “Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.” This is why support for transgenderism is a left-wing cause that so many on the left ore willing to go to the mat for. If they succeed here they will be in a position to start to dictate reality to the rest of us - and we’ll accept it, just as Winston Smith eventually did. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

TWC's avatar

This is it, EXACTLY. Room 101, played out in real time. We, as a Society, either resist, or succumb.

Terrifying book, that one.

BookWench's avatar

If we can be made to believe that a man can turn into a woman, we can be made to believe that 2 + 2 = 5.

Brent Nyitray's avatar

How about a compromise. You can be trans, but when on duty or on base you have to follow the grooming standards and wear the uniform of your plumbing.

Off duty, off base, do what you want.

And no, we aren't medically supporting this.

Strovenovus's avatar

This would probably sort out the people who put priority on service/the organization from those who prioritize their personal identities.

Brent Nyitray's avatar

it takes all the fun out of it.

Richard Fahrner's avatar

this is going on now recall the commercials about the drag queen in and out of uniform, recruiting for the military? that was creepy. if a person wants to be trans it seems that is their end game, so go do it on your own time, not in the military, and dont expect universal or monetary support. This is a personal choice and all the associated costs belong to "the chooser"..

RV's avatar

If they manage to stay for retirement taxes will pay for their medical care for life and that seems like an expensive proposition. What if they have an operation that doesn't work out? That could lead to life-long Veterans Disability. How will they be deployable with all the medications they require?

BeadleBlog's avatar

Retired USN chief and female. What if my truth (my "identity") is I'm really Salma Hayek but I was born in the wrong body. I walk into a recruiter's office or I'm already in the service and go the chain-of-command and tell them I need to live my truth. I need surgery and skin treatment to match my inner truth. I also need custom uniforms to fit my true body once all the surgical treatment is complete. I also need hair transplants to match the hair volume of my inner Salma, and only then I can get back to full duty. We can easily end this stupidity by prohibiting makeup and jewelry and getting rid of uniform skirts and have all wear the same uniforms. Shilling is apparently a skilled pilot but has a psychiatric problem. Talbot comparing having elective cosmetic surgery and taking cross-sex hormones to other service members that take aspirin, motrin, skin cream or whatever while already in the service is narcissistic justification. She did not come across well.

T.K.'s avatar

Also, hormones are mood altering and body altering drugs. Using wrong-sex hormones atrophy sexed organs causing health issues. A belief that demands constant drug use, surgeries and compelled "affirmation" should not be allowed ... anywhere, really.

BRIAN CAM's avatar

Good to hear Chief! When I joined the USN in 1975, I had to swear and check the box I was NOT a Homosexual. Please keep talking TRANSGENDER and trying to show this as Normal behavior instead of the mental illness it is. The Democratic Party is SICKO and HATES America USN 6. yrs FTM1

Chilblain Edward Olmos's avatar

I happen to know you’re lying!

You’re obviously a robot antelope wearing a trench coat!

Respect my feelings!

Madjack's avatar

It’s simply unbelievable we are wasting all this time and effort on this bullshit. If you are crazy and desire this surgery do it in your own on your dime.

SGC's avatar

If you are a human being over the age of 18 that has a penis, you are a man. for the remainder of your life.

In all other cases, you are a woman. For the remainder of your life.

You can call yourself whatever you want. But that does not change reality.

You can delude yourself all you wish. But that does not change reality.

Steven Campbell's avatar

I have an idea. We’ll end this nonsense right now by reinstitution of the draft. Everyone, male , female and confused get to be in the Army for one year, no exclusion, no exemption. All have basic training in the infantry. Same uniforms, same haircuts same discipline and same physical fitness requirements. Total equality. If they make the year and want to make a career we might have a soldier. Otherwise we bid them a fond farewell.

I wonder about the dueling lawsuits. Could be a lot of fun.

BTW mandatory military service is not a rare idea in much of the world.

After the left is done marching and complaining about the draft they could all at least learn to march and do leftist Jody calls.

Steven Campbell's avatar

We couldn’t handle that. The Israelis know what is at stake and that they are fighting for their lives.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

That's funny. The Israeli Defense Forces allow transgender people to openly serve in the military.

Admiral Glorp Golp's avatar

You really are on a crusade. Embarrassing

Steven Campbell's avatar

66 have manditory service. Israel is the most and longest. 16 are like us, when needed. The rest are no. It’s interesting to see who is who. Nice graphic on google.

Richard Fahrner's avatar

If the US moves to mandatory service and trans cannot serve, guess how many folks will develop their mental illness program..

I have upmost respect for our citizens who volunteer to serve, but do not want trans in the service.

Steven Campbell's avatar

Always loved Klinger but he never claimed to be a woman, just a section 8. He was denied based on Catch 22 logic; if you don’t want to be here it doesn’t mean you’re crazy, but the opposite. Never understood why gender dysphoria would not qualify as a mental disorder which would be disqualifying.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

The Israeli Defense Forces allow transgender people to openly serve in the military. I suppose you didn't know that.

Lis's avatar

I’ve been over there and seen the obvious women in service. They don’t have shaved heads. They have updos and long nails, carrying Uzi’s. I think there should be mandatory service for everyone in the US.

Steven Campbell's avatar

Actually, I heard that anyone with a pulse can serve. When the alternative is death, who can be picky.

BeadleBlog's avatar

No makeup, no earrings, no uniform skirts. Just slacks.

Steven Campbell's avatar

Fatigues. Shaved heads. Shined boots.

clockworkcatcher's avatar

That's honestly not a bad idea.

Rick Dyer's avatar

I am a Vietnam Veteran who lived in the jungle on a firebase for a year in what were generally tight quarters and close proximity to my fellow soldiers. To my knowledge we never had any queers in our group (yep, that what we would have called them) and they would have been ostracized (or MUCH worse). If there was someone on the the team we didn't trust or who we thought was likely to be the cause of our death, there would have been swift "justice". We has fragging on occasion over these types of issues.

I don't know why the left is trying to push this.