55 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Fiery Hunt's avatar

My hat's off, Matt.

I think all of this is really seeping into our collective consciousness and people are really beginning to understand that these people aren't just misguided but in fact they actively hate us and want to control every aspect of our lives.

It won't work.

Thank you for your huge role in uncovering their vile schemes.

Expand full comment
Gabriella's avatar

I do wish you were correct, however I still see too many people who are not awake.

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

I hand out hard copies of Matt's articles to my somnambulant friends. Some actually read them and respond favorably.

Expand full comment
Harry Potter's avatar

Book em Danno. Sorry couldnтАЩt resist. Seriously, good for you. We have to persist in engaging those that do not see.

Expand full comment
WAHomeowners's avatar

Maybe stop using the word "awake" to describe people who don't fall for the propaganda? Too much like "woke" which, as we know, is a horrible state of mind.

Thanks.

Expand full comment
Karl Humungus's avatar

Yes, "Awake" just means "self-deluded". I would say "free speech friendly" since every other descriptor has been co-opted, and people who think Free Speech is bad are readily identifiable as full of shit.

Expand full comment
ReelinтАЩ In The Fears's avatar

YouтАЩre not wrong. How about; Aware? Conscious?

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

тАЬBasedтАЭ is another option that тАЬYuri BezmenovтАЭ uses in his Substack.

Expand full comment
Marc's avatar

Just say "informed". Nobody wants to appear poorly informed.

Expand full comment
WAHomeowners's avatar

There are MANY people swallowing the MSM propaganda that think they are informed when they watch their CNN dude or Rachel Maddow. Hahaha. Riiiight.

Expand full comment
Gabriella's avatar

This is my challenge with some very close to me. They think they are informed. They are not. They have yet to be awakened.

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

How about nothing at all but what they are? Deluded.

Expand full comment
Dorothy Unleashed's avatar

Actually, the words reveal the essential difference. Awakening is something you do. Its a verb. Verbs тАШareтАЩ, meaning they happen in the moment, so its never over. Woke is a label. Its an object. It has no action on its own. No action, no power. Power is expressed in action. I mean organic power, which is personal agency. Woke is also past tense. Over. Something that happened. Not happening any more. Its a vacuous term that is as empty as the heads that drank the koolaid it represents. Embrace the power of тАЬawakeningтАЭ. Its the antithesis of woke. Instead of letting a vacuous concept change yet a legitimate word, use its power to obliterate the delusion of a тАЬwokeтАЭ aka sleeping mind.

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

Never really understood the term!

Expand full comment
Gabriella's avatar

Yup. Thanks.

Expand full comment
DarkSkyBest's avatar

Today i actually saw a license plate, "STAY WOK." Maybe it has to do with healthy cooking, but I'm thinking not.

Expand full comment
ReelinтАЩ In The Fears's avatar

One set of eyeballs at a time!

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

Yes. All you have to do is go to the comments in WAPO!

Expand full comment
Ellerslie's avatar

People are not understanding. Look at the elections that just happened. The Democrats should have been routed. They weren't.

Expand full comment
Shelley's avatar

Tuesday was another testing of their cover-story system. In many instances it was a two-for. First provide a year-long cover as in the тАЬGOP just doesn't understand that the majority of people want unfetter access to killing their unborn children. They will lose every time at the ballot box with their stupid interfering in a woman's right to choose.тАЭ Then тАЬsee I told you soтАЭ as they throw out votes by republicans and independents, pad the Dem votes for their wins. Republican pundits and supporters are stupid enough to take the bait and believe it was their 'messaging' on choosing life that lost the votes. The other rigging is to make sure a marijuana measure is on the ballot so the Dems can say the younger Democrat voters came out.

Expand full comment
Barry Fay's avatar

"Killing unborn children" is simply a non-sequitur. Being born is an essential element of being a CHILD. You just want to depict yourself as a "protector of "children" and a moral apostle whereby it costs you nothing, not even a bit of inconvenience. Free sainthood! What a deal. (talk about Black Friday!)

Expand full comment
Shelley's avatar

Feel better with that off your chest? Not to speak out is condoning the murder of a helpless soul. Who is man to decide when a human being is not a human being? The death of others is of no consequence to too many people who have lost their humanity.

Abortion has been a policy of the western countries since the 1960s when it was decided that over-population needed to be curb. It had a list, a very long list, of ways to reduce birth rates and legalizing abortion was just one of them.

Expand full comment
Barry Fay's avatar

That is the most skewed rendition of history I┬┤ve ever seen: the old "over-population" ruse. Women have been aborting babies for time immemorial for a plethora of reasons, including disease, infidelity, poverty, health concerns, rape etc. etc. etc. Wake up. And, by the way, I loved how you went from "babies" to "souls" , which is a concept with no meaning outside of some medieval belief system.

Expand full comment
Shelley's avatar

Facts on your "ruse".

https://nssm200.com/population-and-the-american-future-the-report-of-the-commission-on-population-growth-and-the-american-future/63.htm

And the details provided by Planned Parenthood in 1969 to the president of The Population Council https://jaffememo.com/

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/population-control-and-official-usg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Population_Affairs - Created by an Act of Congress in 1970. Title X program is designed to provide access to contraceptive services, supplies and information to all who want and need them. By law, priority is given to persons from low-income families.

Expand full comment
Barry Fay's avatar

As I said, and you fail to address, people have been aborting pregnancies for time immemorial. For you to pretend it all started in America in the 1960s is laughable. And as for the government assisting abortion access, see the Helms amendment and the Hyde Amendment. I see, upon rereading this thread, that when you said "who is man to decide when a human being is not a human being?" I should have just passed on. You are a perfect example of a "man" making that decision. You are clearly the progeny of Born Again Christian propaganda - a cohort it is useless to engage. Goodbye...

Expand full comment
Bull Hubbard's avatar

What do you think of all this hand-wringing about overpopulation now that it's clear Western countries have birth rates that are below replacement levels? Natives are not reproducing, which is why the so-called "great replacement" is a fact happening in real time accelerated by open border immigration policies.

Expand full comment
Shelley's avatar

All the operative means they threw at it worked, didn't it? Why are the Western countries going after Christians - the ones that believe they answer to the Creator rather than the gov? Because the age of reason, of liberalism didn't quite extinguish a Deity. Those bible thumping Christians that won't give up their God, guns or liberty need to be replaced by others that can be suppressed.

Expand full comment
Bull Hubbard's avatar

Good question. The persecution of Christians and the desecration or burning of European churches is no doubt encouraging Muslims who want a European Caliphate. And intersectional victimhood calculations make criticism of radical Muslims off-limits. Any complaints about Muslim street violence, grooming gangs, church arsonists, or Imams preaching hate of infidels and fomenting jihad are met with accusations of "racism," "xenophobia," and all the usual horseshit prefabricated slurs.

By destroying what's left of Christianity, atheistic neo-Marxists are, consciously or not, clearing the way for the Muslim domination of Europe. We already see it in the UK and a few European countries.

Not with a bang, but a whimper.

Expand full comment
Shelley's avatar

The UK arrests people who silently pray on a sidewalk. Under the installed Biden, his FBI goes through old state files and finds documents related to pro-life events, then sends SWAT teams with weapons drawn to homes to arrests, prosecute and jail pro-life members that it says violated ClintonтАЩs 1994 FACE Act, even though no such violation was brought locally at the time of the supposed тАШincident.тАЩ The DOJ goes after parents that complain about porn books in grade school.

The FBI deploys тАШinformantsтАЩ in Traditional Catholic тАЬTCтАЭ churches that still perform the Traditional Mass. The Jesuit Bergoglio was installed in 2013 as Pope to take down the Church (as planned by Vatican II doctrine in the mid-1960s, in conjunction with the one world government whose goal was established during this same period). Bergoglio cares not about abortion, gay marriage, LGBTxxx, but тАЬTCтАЭ faithful Cardinals, Bishops and Priests are standing firm on the teaching of the Bible. This prompted SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center funded by George Schwarts aka Soros) to produce a report some years ago that claimed тАЬRadical Traditional CatholicismтАЭ was dangerous. The FBI used this report last February as a primary resource to justify the agencyтАЩs monitoring of certain Traditional Catholic groups. The memo claimed that тАЬwhite nationalistsтАЭ were increasingly seeking refuge in such communities and that тАЬmitigationтАЭ efforts were needed. Just yesterday the Pope removed Bishop Stricklin from his post in Tyler Texas. His faithfulness was an affront to BergoglioтАЩs new definition of the тАШchurch.тАЩ

God and guns are THE two blessings that our Constitution gave us and they indeed have been our defense against the hostile takeover of the US for the last 50+ years. Those are the targets of the USG and it is unrelenting in its assaults and intimidation tactics.

Expand full comment
Bull Hubbard's avatar

"Soul" is a common synonym for "person," tho a bit archaic in our atheistic era. That you imply Christianity to be a mere "medieval belief system" gives your game away.

You two are at odds, taking positions on the human being question that can't be reconciled. Let's say for the sake of argument that Shelley here assumes we are born with souls and you don't.

The phrase "unborn child" is not non-sequitur if you believe "child" is a synonym of "human embryo" or "zygote." "Child" connotes "juvenile human being" while the other terms connote the commonality of all sexually reproducing species.

The burden would be on Shelley to opine when a zygote is inspired with a soul.

Expand full comment
Shelley's avatar

Jews believe that God sends an angle to be the soul at inception. Christians are told that God knows us at conception, even before our parent do. I have no words left for those that believe the innocent, defenseless human being that fights to move away from the suctions tube inserted into the womb has no right to exist.

Expand full comment
Coco McShevitz's avatar

So is it your view that a baby crowning during childbirth is not a child, since only part of its head is sticking out? And presumably therefore it would be fine to, say, smash its skull in with a hammer at that point as it is not a child? Or if no, perhaps you can clarify the point at which you think a baby becomes a child.

Expand full comment
michael888's avatar

Only the idiot Republicans could throw away their advantages by touching the Third Rail of abortion access.

The last two Establishment Presidents (and many Democrats) have won elections by promising "the first thing I'll do if Elected President is codify Roe vs Wade into federal law". Even when elected with control of both the House and Senate, both Obama and Biden did absolutely nothing (Obama said it was low priority. Biden didn't even acknowledge the question.) Of course like raising the $7.25 federal minimum wage (from W's time as President), student debt relief, immigration reform, and many other issues, there is no intent by either Party/ the UniParty to resolve perfectly good Election issues that have served to elect so many politicians.

I was surprised by an article on Scheerpost ( scheerpost.com/2022/06/24/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-of-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit/ ) that Ruth Bader Ginsburg favored the states' involvement, as is now the case with SCOTUS's Dobbs decision (although surely she would object to specifics).

Rejecting the Bill of Rights seems de rigueur these days (censorship, surveillance, confiscation of personal items-- National Security!) and States Rights, the Tenth Amendment, has long been under attack. We saw what happens when the Federal Government moves beyond ADVISORY roles in Public Health to CONTROLLING and mandating useless Covid protocols and restrictions ( Omicron ended the Covid pandemic, just as natural infective immunity has kept mankind extant through the ages).

I favor bodily autonomy-- for access to abortion and vaccine decisions. With 50 states there's a chance that maybe a handful would get Public Health right? They would be oases in the great desert that is the US federal National Security police state.

Expand full comment
P.S.'s avatar

Repubs are not earning their votes. They have been lazy & not representing the people that put them there. They see what has been happening to Trump, yet they stay hidden under their desks, hoping that they can just coast back into their positions. The only way to get real representation, is to get rid of the dead wood that is there now.

Expand full comment
ResistWeMuch's avatar

the repubes are bought and paid for corporate cokcsukcerz.

dems use money to gain power.

repubes use power to get money. two wings of the same fascist vulture.

Expand full comment
Gloriabeth's avatar

That doesnтАЩt necessarily mean real people are тАЬvoting.тАЭ

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

I am with you and I don't live in America. I am with Matt because I live in England where our swamp is a thousand years deeper than yours...no one here talks about MI5s role in the Russia fakes.

I have no idea of how people on the platform vote but I do know about political lies and the hild globalists have on countries here in Europe.

I also know that in our countries the police will follow orders and arrest us, the security agencies will track and harass us the army will fight us...Your country is in the early to mid stages of civil war...

Expand full comment
The Scratch's avatar

Some of your media appear to be more professional and less politically bias than ours. I like The Telegraph, especially Ambrose Evans- Pritchard articles.

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

Some. But even the Daily Mail has become our equivalent of Fox and become a turncoat. The problem is that we don't have the quality or quantity of your independents not the desire for truth.

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

Always was.

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

The Telegraph is ead by old white colonialists. Give me a break!

Expand full comment
Jazzme's avatar

Well it might work in a powerful military authoritarian state called USA

Expand full comment
Fiery Hunt's avatar

Never forget where we started from... ruled by a powerful military authoritarian state called England. :)

Expand full comment
SpC's avatar

Yeah and look what England has become since. Think the same can't happen here? Don't believe there's a bunch of Wizards who don't want you peeking behind the curtain?

Expand full comment
Apollo's Lyre's avatar

Spot on. Been saying it for years now: we need to kill Hanlon's Razor. These people aren't just misguided or mistaken, they are malicious. We need to face that or they will continue to "accidentally" confine us within a dystopian nightmare that just so happens to fulfill their every perverse desire while simultaneously destroying the lives and liberty of whomever falls within their Sauron-Panopticon police-state gaze.

Expand full comment
Barry Fay's avatar

You are right about everything except "it won't work". It is indeed working very well and will continue to do so. The only attempts to put the brakes on are done by people like Matt, i.e. people with absolutely NO POWER.

Expand full comment
Fiery Hunt's avatar

Never underestimate the power of the pen.

...the truth shall set us free.

Expand full comment
ErrorError