RT is a propaganda outlet. Everyone knows it's a propaganda outlet. So, going over to RT and pushing your agenda there is *much worse* for your agenda than literally saying nothing. You might genuinely incur less reputational damage by murdering a child, hollowing out its body, and using it as a hand-puppet to discuss climate change.
Yes, if you want anti-war sentiments to be received credibly in U.S. media, and by the U.S. populace, espousing them on an unabashed propaganda network is probably not going to have the effect you want.
I'm not sure why you are here if you didn't read the article above, in which your question is clearly answered.
Clearly to your satisfaction, perhaps.
RT is a propaganda outlet. Everyone knows it's a propaganda outlet. So, going over to RT and pushing your agenda there is *much worse* for your agenda than literally saying nothing. You might genuinely incur less reputational damage by murdering a child, hollowing out its body, and using it as a hand-puppet to discuss climate change.
So saying nothing is better than espousing anti-war sentiments on RT?
Saying nothing is certainly better than what ever excuse DwhyтАЩs posts have.
Makes you wonder dwhy I even bother, amirite?
Yes, if you want anti-war sentiments to be received credibly in U.S. media, and by the U.S. populace, espousing them on an unabashed propaganda network is probably not going to have the effect you want.
Duh.
Lol - than literally saying nothing?
I suppose Ventura shouldтАЩve been a good little war monger and sucked that Bush cock.
Fuckouttahere.
So literally the only two options are, suck neocon dick or suck Kremlin dick?
Ventura wanted to get paid. Obviously.
The funny part is literally how easy RTтАЩs job is. Just have people come on and speak their mind. Pretty easy work for a propaganda outlet.
I love a smart sense of humor