In what sense? It's Karens demanding to speak to the manager until they discontinue services to the site. "Do you REALLY want your company associated with these kinds of people? No? Then stop doing business with them or we complain on Twitter." There's no violence or threat of violence involved.
In what sense? It's Karens demanding to speak to the manager until they discontinue services to the site. "Do you REALLY want your company associated with these kinds of people? No? Then stop doing business with them or we complain on Twitter." There's no violence or threat of violence involved.
I don't like it, but I don't see how it's illegal, much less terrorism.
The only possible exception is DDOS protection. DDOS IS illegal. But asking Cloudflare (or whoever) to drop a site's DDOS protection isn't. It's not RIGHT, and it's a bit like complaining to a private security company to stop protecting a house in an area where police won't go: We all know what happens afterwards.
But public pressure campaigns aren't illegal and they aren't terrorism.
In what sense? It's Karens demanding to speak to the manager until they discontinue services to the site. "Do you REALLY want your company associated with these kinds of people? No? Then stop doing business with them or we complain on Twitter." There's no violence or threat of violence involved.
I don't like it, but I don't see how it's illegal, much less terrorism.
The only possible exception is DDOS protection. DDOS IS illegal. But asking Cloudflare (or whoever) to drop a site's DDOS protection isn't. It's not RIGHT, and it's a bit like complaining to a private security company to stop protecting a house in an area where police won't go: We all know what happens afterwards.
But public pressure campaigns aren't illegal and they aren't terrorism.
lol, some one call it right wing snowflakery