Calling someone a troll just because they disagree with you is a symptom of extreme ignorance. It used to be that only lefty snowflakes would stoop to that tactic... I guess that says a lot about where the right is at these days.
Calling someone a troll just because they disagree with you is a symptom of extreme ignorance. It used to be that only lefty snowflakes would stoop to that tactic... I guess that says a lot about where the right is at these days.
No I call you a troll because I can read your comments up and down this thread -- none of them adding anything at all to the conversation.
Matt gets tens of thousands of subscribers because he writes shit worth reading. MSM 'Stackers do not, because they don't. The facts remain the facts no matter what you say about them.
---------
damn, I missed the circle jerk
---------
lol, who are you calling sycophant, sycophant?
Pathetic is right.
---------
What's worse? Lying, or being a pro-Russian hack who can't get basic historical facts straight?
I'd call you a shill if I could imagine anyone hiring you.
--------
Matt's following seems to be about 98% brain-dead conservatives these days... even calling him a lefty anymore is a stretch.
...but don't let me interrupt your jerk session.
-----------
Just a taste of your 'contributions' to the thread.
No, my facts are facts. Does Matt have tens of thousands of paid subs? (Yes) Do MSM 'Stackers like Taylor Lorenz? (No) Are your replies all to me and my 'opinions'? (No) Are you here to distract from the thread with name-calling? (Yes)
See, this is what I'm talking about. You're too dumb to even understand what I'm criticizing you for.
(paraphrase) "Taibbi gets 10ks of subscribers" - that's a fact.
(paraphrase) "MSM doesn't get 10ks of subscribers" - I haven't researched this, but it's at least a reasonable assumption.
"I don't see that on the 'Stacks of drone reporters, and for good reason -- the value of their reporting is basically zero because they only repeat what they've been told to say" - this is opinion, based on nothing but your conjecture.
Calling someone a troll just because they disagree with you is a symptom of extreme ignorance. It used to be that only lefty snowflakes would stoop to that tactic... I guess that says a lot about where the right is at these days.
The truth hurts, dummy.
No I call you a troll because I can read your comments up and down this thread -- none of them adding anything at all to the conversation.
Matt gets tens of thousands of subscribers because he writes shit worth reading. MSM 'Stackers do not, because they don't. The facts remain the facts no matter what you say about them.
---------
damn, I missed the circle jerk
---------
lol, who are you calling sycophant, sycophant?
Pathetic is right.
---------
What's worse? Lying, or being a pro-Russian hack who can't get basic historical facts straight?
I'd call you a shill if I could imagine anyone hiring you.
--------
Matt's following seems to be about 98% brain-dead conservatives these days... even calling him a lefty anymore is a stretch.
...but don't let me interrupt your jerk session.
-----------
Just a taste of your 'contributions' to the thread.
So your opinions are facts, but my opinions aren't?
Like I said, dummy. It's not my fault that the comments are filled with people like you.
No, my facts are facts. Does Matt have tens of thousands of paid subs? (Yes) Do MSM 'Stackers like Taylor Lorenz? (No) Are your replies all to me and my 'opinions'? (No) Are you here to distract from the thread with name-calling? (Yes)
See, this is what I'm talking about. You're too dumb to even understand what I'm criticizing you for.
(paraphrase) "Taibbi gets 10ks of subscribers" - that's a fact.
(paraphrase) "MSM doesn't get 10ks of subscribers" - I haven't researched this, but it's at least a reasonable assumption.
"I don't see that on the 'Stacks of drone reporters, and for good reason -- the value of their reporting is basically zero because they only repeat what they've been told to say" - this is opinion, based on nothing but your conjecture.
Goodbye.