The 6000 vote change was not just "alleged". It happened. The media reported this when this happened in November. Later on in December, they started purposefully conflating it with other stuff.
The article which you cited does this very same conflation.
This happened by November 6th. This was a historically red county which they claimed had turned blue. So Republicans called it out and then it turned out 6000 votes for Trump were given to Biden instead. They claim that the 6000 vote switch was a mistake by clerk.....how convenient. Mistakes always favoured Biden....
The 12 vote thing your link conflates is a separate thing which happened in December which was AFTER an audit. So 6000 first, then 12. Your link doesn't mention the 6000 "mistake". That's how we know that they are biased.
The 6000 vote change was not just "alleged". It happened. The media reported this when this happened in November. Later on in December, they started purposefully conflating it with other stuff.
The article which you cited does this very same conflation.
Look here from November:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/software-glitch-in-michigan-sent-6-000-trump-votes-to-biden/ar-BB1aMk7c
This happened by November 6th. This was a historically red county which they claimed had turned blue. So Republicans called it out and then it turned out 6000 votes for Trump were given to Biden instead. They claim that the 6000 vote switch was a mistake by clerk.....how convenient. Mistakes always favoured Biden....
The 12 vote thing your link conflates is a separate thing which happened in December which was AFTER an audit. So 6000 first, then 12. Your link doesn't mention the 6000 "mistake". That's how we know that they are biased.