There are Arab Jews. Judaism is a religion, not a race or ethnicity. Albeit like you, anti-semites, the state of Israel, and the religion itself racializes Jews (e.g the seed of Abraham, any Jew can “return” to Israel even if they don’t believe in a god and dislike Moses if they have a “Jewish” grandparent).
There are Arab Jews. Judaism is a religion, not a race or ethnicity. Albeit like you, anti-semites, the state of Israel, and the religion itself racializes Jews (e.g the seed of Abraham, any Jew can “return” to Israel even if they don’t believe in a god and dislike Moses if they have a “Jewish” grandparent).
I don’t care about the name of the country. And removing the nation state law and right of return and their accompanying policies wouldn’t erase the country, it would just make it a more virtuous state, and no longer a Jewish Supremacist state. It could still control immigration, and limit new citizenship to people who demonstrated / expressed a commitment to particular values, like a robust freedom of speech, sexual freedom, the freedom of women, etc.
I’m as opposed to a “Jewish State” as much as I am opposed to a “Christian State” or a “Muslim State” or a “Buddhist State.” None of those religions deserve to rule a country. Likewise I’m opposed to a “white state” or a “black state.” A race of people have no right to rule a country in exclusion of people of other races.
When the US abolished slavery, it didn’t cease to exist as a country, it just stopped being a slave state. When it adopted more strict laws forbidding discrimination based on race, it didn’t cease to exist. When Israel stops discriminating based on whether people are Jewish or not, it will still exist. But just not the way Jewish supremacists would like.
So how come you don’t yap about all the Arab countries where they don’t need a constitution because they have the Koran? How come you are so silent about that?
The original post was about a Jewish journalist being fired for criticizing Israel. Why would talk I about the Islamic Supremacist Arab countries? When Matt writes about a Muslim journalist who is fired for criticizing Pakistan, I'll throw my thoughts in about Islamic Supremacism when someone comments about how innocent Pakistan is. I generally don't prepend my criticism of any state or ideology with all the other states and ideologies I have disapproval of to please people that have a pathology of projecting guilt by association. When I criticize BLM I don't first tell people I find the klan reprehensible. And as is the fact that the Klan doesn't have much popularity in the world these days, I don't find myself feeling the need to contradict the notion it is noble and righteous. The Klan is such a despised and rejected entity in every crowd I find myself in. The same applies to Pakistan. I don't imagine I'll ever come across a popular comment in the TK news section straining to declare how righteous Iran is or expressing anger at a criticism of Iran's blasphemy laws. But when it happens, and if I see it, I'll be sure to express my disapproval.
And as is the case with BLM apologists, it doesn't matter if you prepend a declaration of denouncement of the Klan prior to criticizing BLM. Their reaction will be the same. The same generally seems to apply Zionist apologists.
There are Arab Jews. Judaism is a religion, not a race or ethnicity. Albeit like you, anti-semites, the state of Israel, and the religion itself racializes Jews (e.g the seed of Abraham, any Jew can “return” to Israel even if they don’t believe in a god and dislike Moses if they have a “Jewish” grandparent).
I don’t care about the name of the country. And removing the nation state law and right of return and their accompanying policies wouldn’t erase the country, it would just make it a more virtuous state, and no longer a Jewish Supremacist state. It could still control immigration, and limit new citizenship to people who demonstrated / expressed a commitment to particular values, like a robust freedom of speech, sexual freedom, the freedom of women, etc.
I’m as opposed to a “Jewish State” as much as I am opposed to a “Christian State” or a “Muslim State” or a “Buddhist State.” None of those religions deserve to rule a country. Likewise I’m opposed to a “white state” or a “black state.” A race of people have no right to rule a country in exclusion of people of other races.
When the US abolished slavery, it didn’t cease to exist as a country, it just stopped being a slave state. When it adopted more strict laws forbidding discrimination based on race, it didn’t cease to exist. When Israel stops discriminating based on whether people are Jewish or not, it will still exist. But just not the way Jewish supremacists would like.
So how come you don’t yap about all the Arab countries where they don’t need a constitution because they have the Koran? How come you are so silent about that?
The original post was about a Jewish journalist being fired for criticizing Israel. Why would talk I about the Islamic Supremacist Arab countries? When Matt writes about a Muslim journalist who is fired for criticizing Pakistan, I'll throw my thoughts in about Islamic Supremacism when someone comments about how innocent Pakistan is. I generally don't prepend my criticism of any state or ideology with all the other states and ideologies I have disapproval of to please people that have a pathology of projecting guilt by association. When I criticize BLM I don't first tell people I find the klan reprehensible. And as is the fact that the Klan doesn't have much popularity in the world these days, I don't find myself feeling the need to contradict the notion it is noble and righteous. The Klan is such a despised and rejected entity in every crowd I find myself in. The same applies to Pakistan. I don't imagine I'll ever come across a popular comment in the TK news section straining to declare how righteous Iran is or expressing anger at a criticism of Iran's blasphemy laws. But when it happens, and if I see it, I'll be sure to express my disapproval.
And as is the case with BLM apologists, it doesn't matter if you prepend a declaration of denouncement of the Klan prior to criticizing BLM. Their reaction will be the same. The same generally seems to apply Zionist apologists.
"Witch!"
You ducked the issue.