89 Comments

What does a huge, secretive, lavishly funded military-security apparatus do when it can't find a real, credible enemy to fight?

It turns on the people it is supposed to protect and declares them the enemy.

Expand full comment

Thanks again. You fucking rule. Best $5 month ever.

Expand full comment

OK, how many of you are just feds paid to infiltrate the 'Stack?

On a serious note, this is a fantastic article -- though we shouldn't be surprised about its contents.

Expand full comment

We are becoming a police state much faster than I initially thought. If the government outsources the worst excesses I guess they think it's perfectly legal. I really despise these people.

Thanks Matt for staying on top of this story.

Expand full comment

Prolly can’t make it, but I noticed it all started with US Military cooperation, which reminds of a post I made on Twitter today regarding the military involvement in COVID. Someone pointed to Big Pharma as the villain. I said, basically, “It’s not Pharma. It’s the US Military.” Here’s the actual quote, “I used to think what you're thinking, until I realized THE US MILITARY (1) created the COVID-19 virus as a weapon; (2) produced the jab; (3) couldn't legally authorize the jab IF THERE WERE OTHER VIABLE options, ie ivermectin; (4) censored info re all these things.”

I feel a bit like Charlton Heston’s character in Soylent Green when he discovered the obscene truth--his overseers were grinding up little folks and disposing of them to become human fodder (as the military feeds us proles to cannons). “It’s the military!!!”

Expand full comment

Better be quick about it before the heavy hand comes down. It’s coming

Expand full comment

I have come across what I beleive to be sock puppet accounts or "professional" trolls on this site and on Publics in the comments section for months (although not recently).

each time they only read the anti disinformation sites like racket and Public.

they usually agree about sympathetic issue A,B and C, but all this Disinformation/Twitter Files stuff is a big nothing burger. "all platforms moderate content, that's not censorship" or something like that. glad to have more confirmation this is going on...

Expand full comment

On another site it was reported that, "On Sept. 20, Politico published an article headlined "Biden's campaign set to counterpunch on misinformation." The story reported that President Joe Biden's 2024 reelection campaign is "overhauling" its strategy to fight "misinformation" on social media. The new effort includes "recruiting hundreds of staffers and volunteers to monitor platforms." To supervise the work, the campaign hired a former Biden White House staffer named Rob Flaherty, who was described as a "bulldog" and a "controversial figure" whose "combative emails to social media firms have become part of a Republican-led federal court case and a congressional investigation.""

Armed with this information, I posted the following comment in another forum: " Biden's response to charges that his team censors? Redouble efforts to suppress complaints about it!"

My post was instantly blasted from the site.

Expand full comment

It's the fact that they can't stop talking about Americans as "the enemy". IMO, that should be an impeachable offense, and I will certainly never vote for a leader, politician or party that sees a large minority as enemies to be disposed of.

Fuck those assholes, they are there to provide governance for ALL AMERICANS, not thought police the ones that didn't vote for them, as if they are examples of human decency and competence. They aren't decent at all: they've ruined this country and millions are suffering and dying from easily preventable causes while these monsters use their tax dollars to enrich supervillains and support genocides.

Expand full comment

If you're able to cross-post any of this reporting that has your byline on it, I'd appreciate it. Shellenberger has banned me from reading anything on Public.

Expand full comment

The efforts described in this article about the "CTI Files" follow directly from the actions of Professor Michael Mann. He is the author of the "Hockey Stick" version of Global Warming. His paper was published in Nature, April 23, 1998. What Mann did subsequently and very successfully was to recruit a group of "volunteers" to instantly quash any publication or author skeptical of Mann's thesis. This is exactly the path of Terp, Breuer, and Krebs but on a much larger scale.

Just wait until AI is full blown. It will become difficult to impossible to discern fact from fiction.

Expand full comment

Livestream on Racket?

Expand full comment

I'm nauseous.

Expand full comment

They are who we thought they were.

Don’t let ‘em off the hook!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWmQbk5h86w

Expand full comment

I’m wondering about this and other information that’s come out since SCOTUS agreed to hear the suit brought by Drs Battacharya and Keriarty (sp)et al. Will new info such as this be available/allowed to be brought forth?

Expand full comment

The playbook looks straight outta Spy vs. Spy

Expand full comment