I think the "strange idea" in Rogan's case may be giving people from all corners of the political spectrum roaming multi-hour interviews, quite unlike anything other interviewers or media outlets do. "Strange" does not automatically imply bad or criticism, it can just be a neutral description of the core idea that made Rogan big, from th…
I think the "strange idea" in Rogan's case may be giving people from all corners of the political spectrum roaming multi-hour interviews, quite unlike anything other interviewers or media outlets do. "Strange" does not automatically imply bad or criticism, it can just be a neutral description of the core idea that made Rogan big, from the perspective of the rest of the media. As for marginal actors - they are both individuals and have not attempted to grow a team around their 'brand', so this description also appears to be accurate.
Yes, and every once in a while he'll let someone he's interviewing provide some context. The main stream media hates context. Nothing but narrative for th masses. They get uppity when supplied w enough information to think
I think the "strange idea" in Rogan's case may be giving people from all corners of the political spectrum roaming multi-hour interviews, quite unlike anything other interviewers or media outlets do. "Strange" does not automatically imply bad or criticism, it can just be a neutral description of the core idea that made Rogan big, from the perspective of the rest of the media. As for marginal actors - they are both individuals and have not attempted to grow a team around their 'brand', so this description also appears to be accurate.
Yes, and every once in a while he'll let someone he's interviewing provide some context. The main stream media hates context. Nothing but narrative for th masses. They get uppity when supplied w enough information to think