1 Comment
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Dean Miller's avatar

Please elaborate on the injunction risk that caused BMJ to decide it did not need to contact or get comment from those it accused of mis-, mal- and non-feasance.

Recent injunctions in the UK have been filed to protect privacy and national security.

Does your narrative articulate a new threat of prior restraint?

Based on what case of prior restraint, exactly?

Expand full comment