414 Comments

The identification of citizens standing up for children as "right wing" is simply wrong-headed in every respect. Children should be shielded from adult themed entertainment. If you took a child to a strip club, not many people would defend that and child services would view it dimly. Can the drag performers elicit the purpose of exposing children to drag show entertainment?

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023

"Right wing" is now a meaningless smear term for anyone whose thinking deviates from progressivist dogma in any way. Unfortunately this gives cover to those who are truly far right.

Expand full comment

Another meaningless slur, Fascist. Government trying to control all aspects of life via media and industry, narrating correct thought. It's a slow process but we are certainly living it today.

Expand full comment

Spot on.

I’m a bird watcher on the Twit, and was trying to find an article to counter the liberal talking point, ‘The GOP is Fascist.’ I searched for a good 5-minutes, couldn’t find one; I even used alternate search engines.

The thing is, for the past 3 to 4-years, the govt has been run by democrats, and we are (as the Twitter Files laid bare) being ruled by a fascist government. But, it’s not (just) the Repubs.

Expand full comment

And the crowd calling "FASCIST", and calling themselves anti-fascist, are obscenely hypocritical .. succumbing to the pharma narrative, despising anyone who has a problem with pharma owning and experimenting on most of the world. Loving the experimentation of the covid injections in the name of protecting the vulnerable, and loving the experimentation on children in the name of affirmation and inclusion .. And hating free speech while claiming to be for diversity ...

Expand full comment

I never considered myself right wing nor considered most of my opinions particularly right wing but in recent years I've been informed that some of them apparently are so I don't know, maybe? During the Iraq war days it seemed like the right was making the least sense, and in the Ukraine/COVID days it certainly seems like the left makes the least sense. Come to think of it, I usually just root for the team that isn't using the media to shove their ideology down my throat as much as possible.

Expand full comment

In that case, you have been rooting for the GOP for a very long time. Media is hopelessly left wing, and has been for quite some time.

Expand full comment

Media isn't left-wing. "Liberal" is a better adjective.

Expand full comment

Nonsense.

Expand full comment

Like it or not, the conservative take on a lot of issues is today the correct one. Don't feel ashamed that some call it "right-wing". Embrace your inner conservative.

I left the idiocy of Liberal Island in 2014, when it became clear that Obama's admin was helping millions of foreign workers get jobs over US workers (OPT and H-1B visas), when his housing policies led to millions losing their houses, and when his early open-door policies on immigration led to millions arriving from Mexico. Today, under Biden, the entire Dem party is completely insane on almost every issue of importance.

Expand full comment

I know, I felt the same thing as I watched. It is amazing to me that society is even having a debate on this subject. That Matt states "The News2Share cameras take no position on events" also seems deaf to me. I guess I/we have to at least be satisfied that a self-described left leaning journalist is at least reporting on this stuff. Thank you Matt

Expand full comment

That seemed like a journalistic point to include regarding describing how the journalists were treated. I took it to mean they weren't holding a sign for one side or the other. 'News' shares current events without adding bias. It used to be a thing. I like it.

Expand full comment

In my opinion, when you add narrative, and you say the words "right wing" 10 times, and the words "left wing" one time, it's unbalance., I will admit that somebody from my perspective is a little gunshy and looking for the bias, but really not a big deal though, At least they are reporting it and that is a victory these days

Expand full comment

I found it fairly fact based, this is happening, that is happening. Some places the LGBT protecters outnumbered the child grooming protesters. I found it interesting to see that things have escalated that badly in the US. UK was getting violence around the 'TERF' claims when women.protested opening restroom and changing rooms to anyone claiming Trans status.

Expand full comment

I think it says a lot that the protestors on both sides automatically assume that all journalists have picked a side as opposed to simply finding out what's going on. A sign of the times.

Expand full comment

Yes, that was why my first comment was a little snarky. 'News' used to be a thing - and I still like the concept. ;-)

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023

Why is it deaf to you? Isn't the "Just the facts, you decide" style of journalism something to be lauded? If you want someone to tell you what to think there's plenty of that on cable TV.

Expand full comment

In my opinion, it's deaf because he is stating that there is balance, but by me listening to it, there is not. Just commenting that in my opinion, it doesn't seem to be Purely unbiased. Not a big deal though, at least he is reporting on it

Expand full comment

The narrator seems shocked that the right were invited to show up armed. He made Another mention of the right being armed. Then towards the end, he says the left is more heavily armed than the right. He must have felt the fool.

Expand full comment

That's the thing with somebody with our point of view. We can spot bias From10 miles away now. Muscle memory lol

Expand full comment

Drag Shows are great, adult fun all about pushing boundaries and subverting norms. nothing wrong with that...in an adult environment.

what would we say to Childrens Happy Hour?

our Strip Club story time?

Expand full comment

Can you explain the difference between Blackface and Womanface? I really want you to. That’s not a rhetorical question.

Expand full comment

haha, that’s a good question. I see where U are coming from.

for the record, I am a man and therefore drag queens don’t offend me. but I can empathize if they do for some women.

what I find interesting is that, up until a few years ago, I never heard any woman finding offense with drag queens. it seems they are deliberately pushing the line and trying to provoke a response from the other side. that way, when the protestors show up, they can cry bigotry and use that as evidence for their cause.

but I digress, I honestly can’t say what the difference between Blackface and Womanface.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023

I’ve always ignored it, it’s not worth making a fuss about because you’re always the bad guy for being offended. Gay men wearing exaggerated versions of our skins are seen as more oppressed and marginalized. It’s not different than blackface. It’s just the acceptable kind.

You have to pick your battles, and they used to stay within their lane. As long as it was in adult night clubs, whatever.

Men that demand access to other peoples children are predators and pedophiles. Doesn’t matter how that man decorates himself.

Expand full comment

You didn't hear us complain because it wasn't shoved in our faces. I've always found it offensive but it was rarely a topic of discussion.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 8, 2023

Notice Antifa was there as they were during the BLM marches which in my mind were orchestrated by the democrats. This is the kind of thing the democrats encouraged during the Trump years in order to show just how bigoted his base was. Notice homophobe was screamed out several times, yet the protest had nothing to do with that issue. I think they are purposely conflating the two so those who are against young children attending drag shows are perceived as homophobic.

Expand full comment

They admit to being paid and funded by Open Society and George Soros IS a top Democratic Party donor. He and his goulish children are driving the gay conversion and sterilization industry out of Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood formerly offered good woman centered health care for low income women, now full of men in drag pushing hormones to minors.

Yes, Antifa are the Jackboots of Democratic Party billionaire donors.

Expand full comment

Planned Parenthood is and was always about eugenics. It's just that in addition to aborting people from the wrong socioeconomic class or with the wrong skin color they also will gladly sterilize them.

Expand full comment

One of the best comments ever posted since internet posting became a "thing." Really. Kudos.

Expand full comment

I noticed quite a bit about Antifa that day. I walked among them for hours before they attacked me. I stepped out of street activism after the Baltimore uprising, and then pushed out of The Left for being a TERF. So, Antifa has changed a lot since OWS, or perhaps I see them differently now. I walked among them comfortably for hours because they used to be “my people”.

What I witnessed was a WrestleMania performance with what seemed like stunt actors. Even the hits were like stunt hits, all sound no contact. That protest was run by white people who travel from protest to the other, military types who get paid to whip up the brown street kids.

Those street preachers were surreal in the sense that they too seemed like performers. I got there early and all the opposing protestors and press crew knew each other by name, as if they were all gearing up for a performance they all knew well.

I was in shock most of the time, because it felt like being in the middle of a fabricated event. Unreal. That was like no protest I ever attended. Astroturf on both sides.

Expand full comment

I mentioned before I had a brother who was gay, and unfortunately died if AIDS in the late 1980's. Young. I always knew my brother was different, excepted it, as did my mother. My father didn't, but he was a SOB all around, and so was his sister who spit in his 6 year old face half covered in cake and snarled like a beast, "How does it feel to be a little homosexual boy?" Their mother, my grandmother, never said anything that hurt him. Go figure. I saw all the prejudice, and how it hurt him psychologically. Hard not to be accepted. However, why would men dressed in drag draw in children? No doubt they would say to encourage tolerance, but that's not what is happening. I don't think you should use children to further your cause as an adult, not to mention creating clashes in the streets filled with hate. Why should adults put children in the middle of an issue that adults straight, or gay don't seem to be able to handle? We don't let kids, drink, smoke, drive cars, etc, why drag them into this? No pun intended. Oh, Woman in Purple sometimes I think this world just sucks.

Expand full comment

I'm familiar with the term "blackface," but "womanface" is a new one.

Expand full comment

No. Just no. Kids are kids. Adults are adults. I think parents thinking this is OK for kids are either very uninformed or turning a blind eye to the exaggerated (for lack of a better term) sexuality and the grotesque parody of feminine, of the whole drag thing in order to be “accepting” of the “person” each drag Queen is. Well, I can and do accept accepting the person, but I don’t know of many, let’s use strippers for example, who run around in pasties and g strings. It’s hard for me to see the person when their face is painted and they are wearing 40DD cup falsies.

Expand full comment

Parents should be deciding what’s right for their children, not thugs cosplaying as Rambo.

Expand full comment

Absolutely. If you don't want your kid participating in child porn, no one is forcing you. If you don't want your kid involved in child prostitution, no one is forcing you. If you don't want your kid working in a sweatshop, no one is forcing you.

There is increasingly no difference between child traffickers and liberal trannie dupes.

Expand full comment

You think a drag performance, no matter what is happening or how modest the costume is inherently "adult entertainment?"

You think a drag artist in full nun's habit, long sleeves, neck to ankle coverage sitting and reading *Where the Wild Things Go* is just like a strip show?

No, calling people like you right wing reactionaries is completely fair and reasonable.

Expand full comment

Just. Shut. Up.

If you don't want your kids to go, nobody is forcing you.

Expand full comment

But Matty , do you think parents should be able to bring kids to drag shows? It’s adult entertainment isn’t it? Laws prohibit kids in taverns, clubs and R rated movies. Is this any different?

Expand full comment

It's not adult entertainment. Why would it be?

Expand full comment

Absolutely. If you don't want your kid participating in child porn, no one is forcing you. If you don't want your kid involved in child prostitution, no one is forcing you. If you don't want your kid working in a sweatshop, no one is forcing you.

There is increasingly no difference between child traffickers and liberal trannie dupes.

Expand full comment

I'm not a liberal, and this isn't child porn.

Expand full comment

Drag is a perverted attack on women, full stop. Women's stereotypic characteristics and manners are satirized in drag, in a cruel and vicious manner. Some like it, mostly perverts. What is unacceptable, completely, is allowing children under the age of 21 into the events. Pictures of 6 YO girls putting money into the underwear of adult men with fake breasts should lead to arrest and conviction for sexual contact, not the celebration of Democratic alphabet activists.

Expand full comment

This is a fact often overlooked in discussions of this bizarre social contagion. Male homosexuals in general are hostile to women, and drag is not a "tribute" to womanhood but a fetishization of a few old-time Hollywood starlets and a way to demonstrate that any homo can be as cartoonishly feminine as Mae West or Marilyn Monroe or Jessica Rabbit.

Expand full comment

Uhhh..."Male homosexuals" hostile to women? Domestic violence/murder (and let's not forget about "honor killings") along with rape and everyday harassment of women for just walking down the street can be blamed on straight men, not gays. Seeing men in drag may not be to everyone's liking (including mine) but it is an ancient tradition, including in Shakespeare's times when women couldn't perform onstage...and even before then.

Expand full comment

Since women could not perform on stage, it was NOT DRAG. This is so obvious that I am amazed to see you say it. DRAG IS A PERVERTED SATIRE. In Shakespeare's plays, the men played women straight.

Expand full comment

Amazed that you ignore the most obvious point about who commits real harm against women. As for "drag" many indigenous groups celebrated men who dressed as and danced as women. And don't forget the ongoing Afghan "tradition" of straight men forcing boys to wear dresses and makeup, then forcing them to dance before raping them. Look it up--"dancing boys of Afghanistan."

Expand full comment

Men who have sex with males are not straight. Men who have sex with boys are pedophiles. Men who rape their partners are rapists. Men who rape boys are gay pedophile rapists.

Expand full comment

Nice to know you have everything wrapped up so neatly and labeled. Real life is a bit more complicated. Men in prison have sex with other men but out of desperation, not preference, and consider themselves straight. Pedophiles are attracted to children whether boys or girls--or both. Being gay means identifying with a social group, not just sex. And young men from Islamic cultures often engage in sex with each other because women are off limits...but they would never identify as "gay."

Expand full comment

Anything else?

Expand full comment

OK, you didn't understand my point about the stupidity of your point about Shakespeare. You appear to be so open=-minded your brain long ago ate turf. Like most liberals, you're just not intellectually well-equipped.

Expand full comment

Tyrebyter calling on the Bard.

Expand full comment

Steve, the two are not mutually exclusive, although I would say generally speaking gay males are less hostile to and certainly way less violent to women

Expand full comment

Whataboutism, Steve. Shoddy fallacy in argumentation.

Expand full comment

I had a brother who was gay and died of AIDS. I was closer to him then my other two brothers. I have never found that to be true, quite the opposite.

Expand full comment

Statistics about who harms women (demonstrating hostility) are exactly the point. Saying that most male homosexuals are hostile to women is demonstrably false.

Expand full comment

Check your pants, buddy, and what you find may explain why you don't know what it is like to be a woman. Not that all gay men hate women, but there is a special kind of gay misogyny that women experience. And most straight men don't hate women, either.

Expand full comment

Perhaps you're mistaking misogyny for a sensible distaste for shrill, dyspeptic, brow-furrowed harridans. A characteristic shared by men of all sexual tastes.

Expand full comment

OK, so some fraction of straight men hate women in general as well. This is true. This changes nothing about homosexual men and their general attitude toward women.

Public hangings and witchcraft were also ancient traditions. Longevity does not confer wholesomeness or value.

Expand full comment

What about Duracell batteries?

Expand full comment

I don't disagree with the first part of your statement, and don't care if adults, male or female, go to drag shows, their choice, but to introduce children into this arena is not right. Children can't drive, buy cigarettes, buy alcohol, they are not allowed into movies that are x rated, adults can't engage children in sexual acts, etc. There have always been limits, and there should be. If these types of encounters do anything they just create division, and a backlash generating more animus towards homosexuals. which you are responding to.

Expand full comment

Yes, there have always been limits but it's the responsibility of kids everywhere to push those limits.

Expand full comment

Push them so they can go to shows? If that's what you meant, I couldn't disagree more. If you really understand kids, you know they want parents, teachers, the adults in their lives to set limits. It's a scary world out there when your a child, especially if there is no adult to say no.

Expand full comment

I would have agreed with you about adults going to drag is none of my business up until a few months ago. Due to the clear misogyny with the trans movement silencing women who speak out about the need for our own sports, jails and private spaces, I now believe drag is part of it. I can't think of one other show that caricatures another group and have it applauded as kitschy. I know regard it equal to blackface. It is meant to denigrate us and "put us in our place".

Expand full comment

I don't disagree with you Laura. I believe in boundaries, and don't think it's okay to allow a biological male to participate in female sports, or to use women's bathrooms. I don't care if men want to dress up in women's clothing and do their thing, but not with children. Our whole society is in the throws of destroying boundaries, just look at our border. I believe in immigration overseen by the implementation of rules and regulations. I don't think Adam Schiff should be dictating to Twitter what it can and cannot print, The democrats during the Trump years thought they could remove an elected president from office, talk about ignoring boundaries. Yet they are all a twitter when there is a riot at the Capital, but hundreds of folks were let in through the front door by the Capital police. They came with no weapons, the old and the young, yet they are accused of wanting to overturn the reins of our government. Nonsense. Yet all those who were so upset, senators and congress people alike, thought nothing of giving a thumbs up to destroying whole countries, killing millions in the Middle East, and not giving a thought to their boundaries. .

Expand full comment

"Children of Drag" is the new "Children of the Corn."

Expand full comment

Being an ancient tradition (if indeed it is) does not justify it. Genital mutilation of women is also an ancient tradition. Does that make it right?

Expand full comment

Fuckin' pedophile, right here.

Expand full comment

Seems Bananas Foster is outing himself...right here.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Just look at the interchange below. I think it makes my point.

Expand full comment

I have been told directly from someone that was a gay male drag queen that he was a misogynist and any gay man that says he isn’t is totally lying. I was shocked because at the time I had several gay friends that I never felt that from. I never forgot that conversation though because even if he was wrong about others, he felt strongly convinced it was true.

Expand full comment

In reference to the male drag queen who engaged you in conversation, all I have to say to him/her is, "Mary....get a grip!" You will find misogyny in gay as well as straight culture, although I would have to note that it's probably less about hate, and more about rejection/jealousy. I have seen gay men rag on straight women because they were attracted to the woman's partner. The onus is on them, however.

Sounds to me like your "gay male drag queen" is also a bitter one. The major reason why one would come to terms/accept their queer identity is not because of animus towards women, no more than all lesbians are so because they hate men. That is a childish (and inaccurate) over-generalization. Girl....someone has some issues.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I am glad to hear that, but you are right it happens in many arenas. It just kind of caught me off guard. I felt like he was trying to give me a reality check. But, you are also right, he was a little bitter I think. We never became close enough for me to understand, you know because he hated my gender and all. Thanks for your perspective.

Expand full comment

Sad that your drag queen friend felt that way; I can assure you that many women have close, enduring friendships with gay men--and it's mutual. If there's an element of "jealousy" it might stem from a gay man wishing he could have the same number of opportunities to play around (or be in a relationship) that women do, even if they choose not to.

Expand full comment

"Many women have close, enduring friendships with gay men."

These women were called "fag hags" by gay men in the pre-PC days (still are, for all I know). It's definitely hostile, but human relationships, thank god, frequently occur between gay men and straight women, just like they do among everyone regardless of sexual orientation or even, sometimes, politics (tho this is getting rare).

Which just demonstrates the stupid, divisive nature of neo-Marxist intersectionality and its movements of "liberation" that make one's personal relationships political. People represent their social category within the power hierarchy and their individuality is either irrelevant or counter-revolutionary or "racist" (the latter if you happen to have been born white).

Expand full comment

Well I don’t even think about someone’s sexual orientation unless it becomes an issue (like they want me to acknowledge, validate them or defend myself for saying something wrong). I don’t really think about people according to their race... I mean if I were describing a black man or a trans person I might have to use descriptors but in my head I’m not thinking “my black friend” or “my trans friend”. I mean I know it is impossible not to have some bias according to your life experience or comfort levels, but I guess I just don’t understand why all of this has to be a topic according to either... can’t it just be adult entertainment and leave it at that? I can appreciate their artistic liberty, expression and rights without wanting it to be for underage people. Developing minds... but I’m not gonna say these places should be shut down and everyone jailed. Do I think it’s the healthiest lifestyle? Who cares what I think. But do I need to fall in line behind some pc BS... trample on my rights to free thought to protect others rights to feel good about themselves? Our government also has a right to pursue restrictions on businesses based on outcry from citizens. Not everyone is going to think this is a safe environment no matter if you wear left or right. 🙂 back to my rock

Expand full comment

Totally.

Expand full comment

Don't insult queer men, please....it's most un-Christian.

Expand full comment

That's OK, I'm not a Christian.

Expand full comment

Your request is noted. Wait, who did I insult?

Expand full comment

Apologies. Mis-directed reply.

Expand full comment

Thank you for mentioning this. The current culture climate is an equal

Opportunity for the expression of hatefully exploiting women, based on human rights campaign backed by degenerate billionaire men. It’s ok to talk about the way gay men have created a hostile environment for women, they can’t simultaneously claim to be the most oppressed people on the planet AND claim the civil right to wear our skins in public and make everyone play along.

Matt is too busy covering for Glenn Greenwald, so he’s NEVER going to point out that Glenn used his own internalized homophobia as justification for force teaming Leftist Anti War activism, with corporate backed synthetic sex identities of DNC billionaire donors. Just not interesting enough. Glenn destroyed The Left because he thought it was OK for gay men to wear womanface and make everyone play along.

A constitutional lawyer who worked with the biggest trans activist on the planet, to the point that they talk in the same cadence, didn’t mention that the work he’s doing and the ideology he’s promoting completely erases 100 years of womens sex based rights. Mr “I’m a constitutional lawyer”, didn’t mention that. What he DID do, is post garbage propaganda from HRC. Glenn knows more than anyone how Amnesty International and HRC function, and that’s what he chose to support his arguments.

He says his support for Manning was personal, and clearly it was. Women, lesbians, mothers, every type of leftist tried to explain the ramifications and consequences of what he was promoting, the conflict of rights. For years he ignored women, and every single activist journalist in his orbit has referenced Glenn Greenwald when asked to report the contradictions of gender theory. He dumbed down an entire generation of journalists because of his own ego and his own internalized homophobia.

Glenn loathes women. The only women around him are there because they know their place.

Expand full comment

"Glenn used his own internalized homophobia as justification for force teaming Leftist Anti War activism, with corporate backed synthetic sex identities of DNC billionaire donors. Just not interesting enough. Glenn destroyed The Left because he thought it was OK for gay men to wear womanface and make everyone play along."

I've never heard Greenwald discuss the trans lobby or its politics. Can you explain what you mean by this with maybe an example?

Expand full comment

Go back to the time period around OWS and when Manning was arrested. He has pieces in Salon, The Guardian and The Intercept, in addition to all the video interviews. You can search “Glenn Greenwald Bradley Manning” and look back starting from 2009.

I’m referencing 10+ years worth of his vague indirect propaganda. I include all the He-Man Woman Haters at Wikileaks too. This is a “death by a thousand paper cuts” situation. Glenn uses gaslighting, DARVO tactics, weasel words and straw men to frame his stance when it’s emotional, not factual. He argues like a shady lawyer when he’s wrong.

I’ve been following Glenn since 2007, I loved his work and trusted him because of his OCD diligence to updating his Salon pieces with new facts. I know how this animal hunts.

If you follow Glenn you also know you can often be rewarded with an explosion of hot links to support his arguments. Glenn can’t handle being wrong, so he aspires to always be right. His pieces in support of Manning were written out of character and his assertions were not hot linked with supporting facts, because there are none. What few he did provide, HRC is one, a NGO propaganda outlet that Glenn is well aware is a propaganda outlet. He used HRC exactly the way the Obama administration and its billionaire donors who crafted that junk data, intended. Glenn applied no journalistic integrity. Not at all, and not in keeping with his approach to every other subject. He noticeably abandoned journalistic integrity on this issue. He stated in one piece that his support was personal.

During this time period Glenn began his affiliation with his good buddy Chase Strangio. If you’re familiar with Chase you may notice she speaks in the same awkward cadence that Glenn speaks with. I do know that Chase represents Manning, and Chase works for the ACLU. I know that ACLU donors who are funding gender theory propaganda and legislation, are also top democratic party donors who directly profit from this campaign. The ACLU has been actively seeking the erasure of womens rights on behalf on these donors in the name of this junk science homophobic misogynistic ideology. What I don’t know is how much Glenn applied his legal services in opposition to womens sex based rights and the institutionalization of gay conversion therapy. I’m hoping a curious journalist wants to find out.

There is so much more, and I’m gathering all the evidence as much as I can’t stand listening to his stupid voice. I was deeply immersed in leftist politics at the time, married to a cross dresser that idolized Greenwald and Manning. What those two men did was like a slow moving bullet to my life that I had to watch as it hit me. So it’s difficult to return to that era, now that all the censorship aid starting to crack and the pod people are waking up. I’m still gathering to support what I witnessed and what I lived.

If you care to, look at his interviews with Katie Halper. Kim Iverson, Briahna Joy, Katie Herzog, when all of these women in GGs orbit are asked to comment on trans issues, these women referenced Glenn Greenwald as their response. All of these women couldn’t define themselves as women without checking in with Glenn. Abby Martin may have done this too, but I couldn’t bear to see the degradation. He’s dumbed down everyone in his orbit regarding anything trans related.. Everyone that calls him “friend of the show” (besides Tucker) got Trans issues completely wrong in the same way Glenn got it completely wrong.

The same man that wrote this

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/27/bradley-manning-sf-gay-pride

Gave this revisionist interview in which he giddily played dumb. Women have been pleading with Glenn to see the conflict of rights for over a decade. I start to hyperventilate when I try to break down all the revisionist lies in this interview.

https://youtu.be/cKRDoc9OroU

I’m bitter AF, I lost everything because of this cult. So I’ll continue till I die.

Expand full comment

That's quite a comment. You do know that Greenwald is a pederast, don't you? It's what led him to Brazil.

Expand full comment

That comment is the door to Narnia. No, I didn't know that. He has a lot of rumor swirling around him, including shady dealings with a cabal of gay billionaires. The only bit of gossip I do "know" is that he is a former pornographer, and that is.... basic.

Expand full comment

I see nothing in the Guardian article that suggests Greenwald is on board with transgender political orthodoxy. I read his defense of Manning before his adoption of a woman's appearance as a criticism of the organizers of the SF "gay pride parade" that Greenwald accuses of being paid by corporate donors to ostracize Manning the whistleblower. It also praises Manning for leaking what he did.

I appreciate your zeal and what motivates it, but I'll reserve judgement until I read something of Greenwald's that explicitly demonstrates he's advancing the trans/gay political agenda.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I think this requires a bread crumb trail.

I have not seen your other posts, I don’t know how much information you have about the gender industrial complex, the corporate capture of the LGB liberation movement by big pharma after HIV/AIDS and the need for a new “campaign” after gay marriage was finally legalized. These circumstances play a role in the adoption of T to the LGB.

Glenn takes note of the corporate corruption of Pride, it’s true I’m assuming that he knows all about the corporate capture of LGB liberation. One would assume he does. This is a force teaming with those corporations. Those corporations are exactly who has been driving this, as they’re all invested in ESGs.

Glenn is setting up a false narrative as fact, these are all logical fallacies. If Glenn was being factual, there would be hotlinked evidence. The subject he’s speaking of in glowing manipulated terms, has little to none. So he’s manipulating his audience for emotional reasons about a completely fraudulent corporate backed medical cult.

I don’t want you to just believe me, though I would appreciate it if you’d keep considering it as you learn new information. You WILL learn new information.

Expand full comment

Weird.

Expand full comment

Please stick to biting tires you homophobe.

Expand full comment

Gee, must have touched a nerve. Ick!

Getting this kind of response is like counting coup - my total increases of "perv points".

Expand full comment

Whatever the fuck that means....

Expand full comment

Jesus, you don't know shit do you?

Expand full comment

Please, please, please - do not throw the word "Jesus" around...particularly when you include an expletive in the same breath. If you were a genuine follower of Jesus, you would embrace ALL MEN as your brother. Go back to church, and learn something.

Expand full comment

Personally, o don’t think Jesus was/is that sensitive.

Expand full comment

Which parts were homophobic? Please paste them in your response.

Calling attention to Glenn Greenwalds hatred of women isn’t homophobic. Calling attention to the psyop he ran with Bradley Manning to groom and force team the anti corporate- anti war movement to accept billionaire backed and marketed synthetic sex identities isn’t homophobic.

My point is that Glenn is homophobic. He is the one that’s been fighting for medical heteronormative veneers for gay kids. Glenn has been supporting the medicalization of gay kids. Glenn has been promoting an ideology that serves democratic billionaire donors for the last 10 years.

I just think he’s a garbage human being on his own merit. His sexual orientation is not the basis of my hatred, but it IS the basis of his own activism. His own self hatred and shame that he imposed on everyone else to suffer for.

Expand full comment

Glenn Greenwald is mentally unstable. This much is evident. Everything else about Greenwald is rather beside the point.

Expand full comment

None of what you said is true at all. A lot of the people that enjoy drag and spend money to see it and watch Drag Race are straight women. And women don’t see it as cruel or vicious, we see it as hilarious and something we want to laugh at and celebrate. If you say everything is perverted then the term becomes meaningless, just like how people call anyone they disagree with Hitler. If you go to a typical drag show there aren’t children there because it’s an adult show and we don’t want our kids there anyway. You don’t want your kids at the club lol stop projecting your own sensitivities and fake outrage on women!

Expand full comment

I don't care what amuses bored women. Drag is homosexual entertainment that parodies women. Just don't tell me that painted drag clowns reading stories to children before bumping and grinding and flashing crotch is the same thing as the Stepford Wives laughing at fat cross-dressers over mimosas. If a grown woman finds that amusing, fine.

"Drag Queen Story Hour" (the absurdity of the phenomenon seems lost on many) is now obviously being used as a way to introduce children to homosexuality and trans-sexuality with the aim of "normalizing" these conditions. Some call this "grooming" because it is, just not necessarily with consummation, since public scrutiny is intense at the moment. To the trans/gay political lobby, toleration of what should be one's private sex life is no longer enough, but total sexual disinhibition seems to be the goal. "Live and let live" is now "Look at me and praise me or you are a trans/homophobe." It's a process that is evidently succeeding, too, as the numbers of children declaring themselves to be gay or trans-sexual has increased exponentially over the last few years, while the number of Western births has declined.

Expand full comment

I’m not reading the ramblings of a sad angry man, I just hope you can one day redirect your bitterness into something productive.

Expand full comment

How do you know I'm "sad" and "angry" or "bitter" if you don't read what demonstrates my sadness or anger or bitterness? Are you psychic?

What comments of mine do you disagree with and why?

Yes, I am angry about the lies advanced by the trans/gay lobby and its dupes and theorists, and such forums are a way to clarify my thinking on the issue. If there's anything I may be missing about the theory and intent behind the trans movement or its impact on our culture (or what's left of it), I'd be glad to be informed of it.

Sadness and bitterness? Hell, no! I'm having a fine time. Bitching about politics and the decay of Western culture is a sort of hobby you might say, one that takes up two or three hours every morning after breakfast.

Expand full comment

That's statistically ballsy of you Bull---that linkage of declarations of "gay or trans-sexual" taking place in elementary school cafeterias to the decline in "Western births."

Sounds rather Goldfingerish to me...

"...As a result of 50 years of emancipation, feminine qualities were dying out or being transferred to the males. Pansies of both sexes were everywhere, not yet completely homosexual, but confused not knowing what they were. The result was a herd of unhappy sexual misfits... the women wanting to dominate and the men to be nannied."

Expand full comment

There should be a requirement that every woman-face drag pervert festival have a black-face cakewalk. Black-face and woman-face are the same, and both are unacceptable. Your endorsement of perversion is duly noted.

Expand full comment

You know, there are many credible scientific studies that show that men who have the most negative reaction to homosexuals are likely homosexual themselves.

Just sayin' George.

Expand full comment

GOOOGODOODOAHAHAHA - this is a coded slur against me that I may be homo? Thanks for the laugh. Nope, not a pervert.

Expand full comment

Nothing coded about it. Hahahaha

Expand full comment

Straight out completely stupid is all. You probably think you have attacked me. Just made me spill my beer, sonny.

Expand full comment

So which is it Tyrebyter? A requirement or unacceptable?

Expand full comment

More fallacies from George Qbert! How predictable, your lack of imagination is duly noted.

Expand full comment

You don't get to speak for all women. Drag is just another way that men denigrate and silence us, just like they do when we insist on our right to private spaces, sports, and jails. I would have agreed with you until recently, but now absolutely not. Now I see it as an attack on our womanhood and I don't condone it at all.

Expand full comment

Abortion rights?

Expand full comment

I didn't say I spoke for all women, just women who love and enjoy drag like myself. If you changed your mind once on drag, chances are you'll do it again. My advice is to not take everything so seriously, you will feel a lot better!!

Expand full comment

No, once people see the how it's just like blackface they usually don't go back in the other direction. Some people really do believe in their own inferiority and oppression. There a lot of women out there that believe they are subset of their own sex class and a concept in a mans head, so it's not so crazy that you find this just fine. But those people should not make decisions for the rest of us.

Expand full comment

This is nonsense. Twenty-five years ago I attended a drag show at Finocchio's,, a now defunct but famous drag nightclub in San Francisco. I had no interest in going but I was required to because it was a work related event organized by the doctors I worked for, some of whom were gay. The show was amusing. However, after it ended, I felt terrible because I realized it was clearly mocking me and all the other women in the room. Any straight woman or gay woman who enjoys drag is as clueless as a black person who enjoys a minstrel show.

Expand full comment

Required work event? Geez, that's terrible.

Expand full comment

Vanessa, can you please explain the differences between womanface and blackface, and why one is offensive and one is a stunning and brave entitlement for men?

Expand full comment

I see no difference, except that liberal chuckleheads love savage and demeaning portrayals of women. There is a lot of anger in drag toward women.

Expand full comment

You're attending the wrong drag shows, George.

Expand full comment

I don't attend woman-face shows. I'm not a pervert. Sounds like you are, however.

Expand full comment

I can't speak on blackface because I'm not black. I'm a woman and I'm not offended by men in drag because I don't take everything so seriously and I think drag queens are hilarious and amazing. Can you please explain why you are asking me stupid questions?

Expand full comment

What would you call a black person that loved blackface performers?

It's clear you don't understand why others are offended, and want to extend your own consent to everyone else. That's how we got here.

Expand full comment

That's how YOU got here.

Expand full comment

Well blackface in entertainment ended a long time ago because people decided it was offensive so those people that loved blackface performers are probably dead now. The drag entertainment didn't have the same issue so it has gone on for a long time and is still going strong. I have never heard of people being offended by "womanface" until recently but based on what you and others are saying it sounds like it's just one more stupid thing to get outraged about in a world where we have nothing better to do than get outraged over dumb shit. So good job continuing this annoying and stupid trend of being offended for absolutely no reason. Any other dumb questions for me?

Expand full comment

There is a huge proportion of the population that is of the firm belief that drag is perversion. Trans and drag bullies have forced them into silence. That is changing.

Expand full comment

Which people decided blackface was offensive? Was it white people or was it black people? What is being performed and represented by white people when they perform blackface?

You didn't answer my questions that I asked previously. What do you call a black person that loves black face minstrels?

Expand full comment

"Some like it, mostly perverts." At first, I thought you were weighing in on MLB's designated-hitter rule and I was ready to agree with you, but then I read on.

So, George: your answer, to this drag thang, is to fill up our nation's jails and prisons with 6-year old girls? This is a capitalist nation, George. These girls, as far as I can tell, are not violating any laws when they, in your words, put "money into the underwear of adult men."

I think it's ill-advised, certainly. At least a lotto ticket or two offers the chance, however slim, of some sort of "return." But it's their money and no doubt hard-earned money, and it's theirs to spend however and whenever they want, as long as they're not running afoul of the laws.

But jailing them is not only draconian (in my opinion), it also has the stench of BOTH socialism and authoritarianism about it.

Expand full comment

Flat-out sexual contact to 6 YO girls. I guess you are good with men having sex and sexual contact with 6 YO girls. Those men should be on the sex-offender list, and probably are already.

Expand full comment

Keep me posted, George---that's all I ask of you. And I recommend getting rid of the Mobius strips in your attic apartment too.

Expand full comment

Are you a feminist?

Expand full comment

I'm trying to picture the 2023 me somehow being able to talk to the 2010 me as I explain that, by 2022, people will be fighting in the streets over drag queens.

I also can't imagine myself as a child being excited to sit through a slog of poorly executed show tunes performed by men in pancake makeup while all I really wanted to do at that age was read comics & play baseball. Heck, I'm an adult and I can't make it through more than a minute or two of Ru Paul's Drag Race & that's only the commercial. The actual show looks about as appealing as every other shitty reality game show on TV.

It's hard for me not to see this as little more than the antics of lefty parents who are far more interested in virtue signalling their "open mindedness" on TikTok & Facebook & Tweeter & Instagram than they're interested in entertaining their kids. Their kids are little more than their parent's social justice props.

But hey, the world is full of asshole parents. Not exactly news.

Parents never seem to learn that forcing an ideology of their children often leads to them eventually adopting the opposite ideology.

As far as grooming goes, given the fact the FBI has prosecuted no elite Epstein clients and probably never will, I'd say that groomers are here to stay. Groomers seem to have very friendly ears in the corridors of power.

It all makes me glad that my youngest is 18 & 6'5" and long past the being groomed stage.

Maybe, with a little luck, the left wing can also remove the stigma around cannibalism & coprophagia.

While it may not be a brave new world we're heading into it will be a very, very weird one.

Expand full comment

We are heading into a brave new world because the autogynephile fat cats who fund "transgender" activism ultimately seek to push transhumanism.

Expand full comment

Make it two gold medals. Highly recommend Jennifer Bilek’s Substack blog. All of her articles are eye opening, but her profile of Martine (formerly Stephen) Rothblatt especially so. Rothblatt is into robotics now,and is now and has created his/her 48th prototype of his/her wife. Not quite to Stepford Wives quality, but getting close.

Damn terrifying.

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023·edited Jan 10, 2023

Here's another article about little old Martine,. By the way his "dead name" (real name) is Martin. Enjoy.

https://www.womenarehuman.com/martine-rothblatt-mad-architect-of-genders-final-solution/

Expand full comment

This comment deserves a gold medal

Expand full comment

We call them Munchausen Moms. The most notable is Susie Green, former head of Mermaids. The drag kids moms remind me of the women who write to serial killers, but they too fall in that category.

Expand full comment

Ugh. When did protecting children become a "right wing" thing? Learn to identify a Fascist! Let kids be kids.

Expand full comment

Proud Boy showing up with guns to intimidate people they don’t like is a Right Wing thing. Don’t you agree?

Expand full comment

It should be a criminal thing, as I've seen people seriously injured with paintballs. Almost as criminal as an Antifa loser bashing a cop in the head with a bat (Portland, OR).

Expand full comment

They are both criminal. I am glad we agree.

Expand full comment
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023

Yet the Proud Boys is a Gavin McInnes practical joke that was given life by the corporate press, which is always looking to stir up resentment and conflict. Their actions are a colossal troll of the left and its cheerleaders in corporate "journalism." Anyone taking them seriously from either end of the spectrum is . . . uh . . . misguided, to speak with restraint.

Antifa has roots in Europe, forming when actual Fascists held power in Italy and Germany and Spain. It's American imitators are politically incoherent and the club is a vehicle for twenty-somethings LARPing with politics, acting on half-digested neo-Marxist critical theory. Unfortunately, they are serious in their intentions, however dimly conceived, and are busy making themselves political laughing stocks while making life miserable for everyone in greater Portland.

Edited for grammar

Expand full comment

Our constitution and bill of rights assures us freedom of association-As long as you and the association are not breaking any laws. The 2nd amendment allows citizens to be armed. „Right wing“ is not a punishable offense. Even your hatred of the proud boys is not breaking any laws. Your fear is your problem, not mine.

Expand full comment

Fucking stupid, really. The main terrorists in today's USA are the antifa fascist blackshirts. Add in the BLM terrorists, and this pretty much encompasses the lot. Just like Mussolini's black-shirts, the antifa blackshirts beat up "fascists". They should immediately be arrested on terrorism charges.

Expand full comment

Sounds like an opportunity for George Q Tyrebyter to make a few citizen's arrests and save the republic.

Expand full comment

I've never understood the appeal of drag. If you like women, fine, go to their performances. If you like men, go to theirs. If you like hermaphrodytes, seek them out. Otherwise, a man dressed as a woman calling himself "she" and "a girl" while lip synching for dollar bills must, from my perspective, be an acquired taste. I don't want advice on how to acquire it.

Expand full comment

Have fun, guys, but without me. I don't watch soap opera or CNN either. ;-)

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023

Today's so-called drag shows look about as entertaining as Joe Biden reading Rodney Dangerfield jokes off a teleprompter for the first time.

My Mom took me to see the show at old Finocchio's Club in San Francisco in the early 70's when I was 20 or so. It was hilarious and fun, if adult-only. The entertainers had real talent, could sing, could dance. Some were transvestites, some were gay, some were just working a gig. It was all very campy, risque, and satirical. But that was the point.

Now, the entertainment is gone, and all that left is just offensiveness.

Expand full comment

Like every other good thing co-opted by the neo-Marxists to advance their idiotic intersectional politics, drag has been enlisted to "subvert heteronormativity" and "grind glitter into the carpet."

Expand full comment
founding

Couple things about neo-Marxists, first they know little of Marxism, as they're just in it for the power over others. Secondly, that which they cant control they seek to destroy. Oddly enough, that which they can control, they destroy as well. Kinda like human locusts. Or fire ants.

Expand full comment

A reading of Marx is not required. To over-simplify the matter, neo-Marxism abandoned the class struggle for the "liberation of oppressed minorities." Adorno and Marcuse are the main neo-Marxist political theorists. Critical studies is its vector within universities, outside the academy from K-graduate school, DIE policies in HR departments everywhere and the trans-sexual/gay political lobby are the main areas where the theory is put into practice.

Expand full comment

You people have it all wrong. If you want a generation to grow up despising Neo-Marxists, introduce Marcuse and Adorno into the 5th-grade curriculum.

Expand full comment
founding

Gotta admit, that would do it.

Expand full comment
founding

Of course if you "deconstruct" these theories further, its all just one person thinking they know best about how other folks need to live their lives. The justifications are endlessly recycled through academe. It is second oldest profession. And not 2nd by much.

Expand full comment

There are plenty of great campy drag shows in San Francisco today, at The Oasis and Asia SF. I wonder if Proud Boys are going to start showing up with guns to try and intimidate patrons.

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023

If the activists and their idiot "progressive" parents don't try to bring their kids, I doubt it.

Besides, who in their right minds ventures into SF at night now anyway? Last time I was there I kept flashing on "Escape from New York", and I ain't Snake Plissken.

Expand full comment

Also this:

What are the median and average incomes in San Francisco? top

The average annual household income in San Francisco is $167,663, while the median household income sits at $119,136 per year.

Expand full comment

The working class people who serve these rich pigs can't afford to live in the city, but must commute from as far away as Gilroy.

Their mealy-mouthed rulers don't have the sense to pour piss out of a boot, and together they have created a hellscape in which your six-figure citizens live in fortified compounds with full video surveillance, avoiding the chaos and street encampments in places like the Tenderlolin, going from renovated Victorian to Chinatown for dinner via Uber, carefully avoiding panhandlers and human feces between the curb and the entrance.

Expand full comment

Maybe if these enlightened patrons of the arts bring their minor children . . . but surely antifa will be there to protect them.

Expand full comment

I went to a live drag showing of the Rocky Horror Show at the Oasis and it was fantastic. 21 and up of course, because it’s a bar.

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023

To my point. I'll bet that was entertaining and campy as hell. Given the material it would kinda hafta be.

On another related topic, you ever get the chance to go see "Beach Blanket Babylon"?

Expand full comment

Yeah it was great. Yes I saw Beach Blanket Babylon twice. Too bad it’s not still running.

Expand full comment
founding

So many memories.......

I miss me a walking crab cocktail, and some abalone or sand dabs!

Expand full comment

Nonsense. Nothing good comes from prepubescent children put before men dressed as grotesque female characters reading stories laced with perverted sexual innuendo or performing vulgar stripteases (with the kids often encouraged to "join in" on stage).

Expand full comment

I brought my teen daughter to a showing of Rocky Horror Show and she liked it. Who are you to tell me how to raise my children?

Expand full comment

No, I'm saying you probably shouldn't HAVE children

Expand full comment

Are you in favor of eugenics in general or just people who have political opinions that are different than your own?

Expand full comment

No. The problem isn't with the genetics of your daughter. It's with the way her parent is raising her.

Expand full comment

I saw RHPS as a teen. I thought it was bizarre. I would have probably enjoyed it more if it wasn’t centered on a drag man... it made me feel pervy as an inexperienced young woman. I just imagine even younger kids being a tad confused. But I don’t think anyone should make decisions for YOU. I would think if someone is a drag Queen doing it for artistic purposes only and to make a living-- why would they want kids there? Kids just need to enjoy childhood. But again, I wouldn’t tell a mom how to raise her kids... but I might express my opinion to her.

Expand full comment

You wouldn't even need to make this judgement if drag had not been co-opted to advance an evil and corrosive political agenda. It's got to the point where presumably educated adults are afraid to define "man" and "woman."

Expand full comment

I don't know anybody who isn't afraid to define "man" or "woman." It's potentially paralyzing.

Expand full comment

Stop. You're digging yourself into an even deeper hole.

Expand full comment

Your point? I'm sure many minors would find a trip to a strip club absolutely fascinating. That doesn't mean we can't discuss how good it is for children to engage in such activities.

Expand full comment

Discussions are great. Men with masks brandishing firearms aren’t there to talk things out.

Expand full comment

A teen is not a "prepubescent."

Expand full comment

1. There is plenty of video evidence showing pre pubescent children engaging in these activities

2. It's not good for adolescent children either.

Adult entertainment is for adults. Exposing kids to sexually explicit material and behavior is what pedophiles do.

Expand full comment

Where do you store those videos? The basement or attic?

Expand full comment

You're a degenerate pervert to even joke about such a thing.

Expand full comment

Exactly right.

Expand full comment

Joke? I'm dead serious, chum. Come clean, Mr. Nobody---basement or attic? Of course I knew a guy who stuffed his "no-no" videos into two huge golf bags he kept in the trunk of his Buick Regal.

And I know a few people who might tell you that I was a degenerate pervert long before I even posted that comment. But then they're not exactly Chamber-of-Commerce types themselves.

Expand full comment

Hard to argue with that assessment.

Expand full comment

This is only important in the context of elites fostering these battles as 1. A pretense of disagreement between the parties when they work for the same imperial puppeteers and 2. These battles take all eyes off the elites who are plundering our vast public wealth for empire and endless war.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023

No, no, no. Millions of children are now being brainwashed to reject their physical sex. They being set up for a lifetime of misery with cross sex hormones, mutilating surgeries. compromised health, and shorter lifespans. It's all being orchestrated by a group of autogynephile billionaires (Pritzker, Stryker, Rothblatt) in the service of capitalism, high tech medicine and "transgender" perversion. This shit is now being spread all over the world. Follow the money:

https://www.the11thhourblog.com/

Expand full comment
founding

Yes, thank you for posting this. See also this resource documenting the truly alarming and expanding teaching of transgender ideology in many of our nation's public schools. This deserves wide circulation: https://caroldansereau.substack.com/p/the-anti-science-disaster-of-gender.

Expand full comment

The elite private schools are even worse.

https://undercovermother.substack.com/

Expand full comment

Thank you for the link. This indoctrination program, in which DQSH plays a key role, is whack job insane. It shows how the inmates have now taken control of the whole asylum. And if this demented garbage is being promoted in the public schools in 2023, I shudder to imagine what the next ten years will bring.

Expand full comment

Horrifying. Schools should not have this much power. I didn't let my son get his sexual education in school because I knew it was a very progressive middleschool (Portland OR) and the notification was vague. I kept him home that day. He was not outraged by this. He is not homophobic or troubled. He understands the biology of sex. He understands that some people are not heterosexuals.

Expand full comment

Good for you for keeping your son home that day.

Expand full comment

A friend of my wife has an autistic daughter. Poor social skills, few, if any friends, etc., etc.

Her gender was never an issue until they bought her a phone & she started on TikTok.

Not long after her introduction to the wide wonderful world of narcissistic TikTok-ers she announced that she was really a boy named Ezra.

At one time I would have thought "just a phase" but now I know that kids like her are under enormous social pressure. Being heterosexual & white is literally like being human excrement in certain circles.

A kid like that, hell any teenager, doesn't have the strength to resist that kind of ostracism.

Then, once they flip, the love & acceptance pours in. To an autistic girl who has known little social acceptance from her peers, that must be like a drug.

That, of course, would be bad enough but behind it all is a huge transgender industry of doctors & pharmaceutical companies & media talking heads poised exploit that poor kid's utter confusion in the name of profit. Their profit, not hers.

Ultimately the only people in this equation that actually care about the kid are the parents and they are often the ones who are shut out of the process.

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry to hear about your friend's daughter. Children with autism are especially vulnerable to "transgender" brainwashing. The parents should stop using the phony name and pronouns. They should take away her phone immediately and replace it with a flip phone. The parents should also remove her from school and educate her at home. If need be, they should move out of their state.

Those may sound like extreme measures but it's the only way to save their beloved and vulnerable child from being processed though the "transgender" meat grinder.

Expand full comment

Well, they have an older daughter who was a sweet kid till she went away to college. Came back completely changed. She left for school close to her Mom, came back from college wanting to break all ties with both parents except for, of course, monetary assistance.

She blindsided her Mom with a long accusatory letter about things that her mom did not understand. Neither did my wife & I because we know her. She's one of those moms who wouldn't hesitate for a minute to walk into a burning building for her kids. She's always been supportive & loving.

The Mom has tried to be understanding but it is obvious from how the girl talks that someone got to her. A therapist, a professor, someone fed her a lot of bullshit.

Then her husband got very sick & had to be placed on oxygen.

In other words, she has her hands full & her options have shrunk.

It's not that I disagree with you I just don't know if any of that, other than pulling the phone, is feasible.

I know that people doubt that universities have become indoctrination centers but something happened to that older girl at college. Something very very odd.

Thanks for the concern though.

Expand full comment

My very first boyfriend, now deceased) sent his four brilliant and lovely daughters to Brown University. Two of the daughters are "transgender" female to males with double mastectomies and male hormones. The third daughter wears a ring through her nose (like Elmer the cow), uses they/them pronouns and calls herself nonbinary. I suspect they're all on the autism spectrum.

Expand full comment

This is all fostered by elites and is self mutilation and criminal acts by greedy doctors and medical facilities but it’s distraction and destruction. The elites could care less about this issue other than serving to divide and confuse the population. People are realizing the contradiction that one’s sex is how one feels about themselves but yet is actualized via superficial costly risky drugs and self mutilation to mimick the opposite sex--mostly poorlly, stereotypically and futilely and with no evidence of mental health improvement.

Expand full comment
founding

I agree that dividing the working class is one of the ruling class's motives, but it is not the only one. This is a huge profit-making enterprise for the Big Pharma/Medical Industrial Complex. There is always division within the ruling class, but the predominant factions are pushing this for their own ends, and not merely to divide and conquer. The Eleventh Hour Blog has documented this pretty well, as have others.

Expand full comment

As someone who works in healthcare, it is astonishing the amount of pre-teens and teens that are undergoing hormone blockers and gender modification. It just seems too young. These therapies and surgeries are covered by Medicaid in my state.... for children. I don't get it.

Expand full comment

There will be profiteers, of course, but to the truly powerful the discord amongst us and the distraction from their genocidal, endlessly greedy imperial aims are the goals. The profiteers predictably keep the fight going and the fights appear to be exactly chosen for their endless sustainability. Destruction of tradition is also a goal of authoritarians so as to replace with their own dictates.

Expand full comment

I had almost finalized a deal with George Soros who had agreed to supply my Antifa cell with a cache of weapons and explosives---IEDs, AK-47s, MANPAD surface-to-air missiles---all the good shit---and at the last minute dude makes the shipment contingent on us producing three high profile Drag Shows in major U.S. cities.

We all said fuuuuuuck that.....

Expand full comment

Just when I begin to adjust to late stage capitalism a group of autogynephile billionaires show up at my door.

Expand full comment

See, THIS is a good comment.

Expand full comment

I love now Gen Z has found a way to freak out their square parents. The funniest part is that you can’t realize that the gender bending comes from their peers and is not due to some kind of indoctrination from outside. I guess you can’t admit that little Timmy might be queer.

The more hysterical your freak out, the happier the adolescents become. Do you really not remember being 16 and pissing your parents off?

Expand full comment

I remember 15 better than 16 champ. That was the year my buddy dragged me to the apartment of an older guy, late 20s or early 30s, who promised us booze & weed.

After a few hours of drinking my buddy passed out, something he was prone to when inebriated.

As I sat their attempting to navigate the simple fact that I was fucking hammered I happened to glance at the older guy. He was sitting with an unlit cigarette in his mouth, staring at my buddy as drool dripped off the end his smoke. When he noticed that I was staring at him he stood up, left the room & returned with a copy of Hustler magazine which he proceeded to dump into my lap. He then sat down next to me, asked me if I saw anything in the mag that I liked & then shoved his hand between my legs.

So I broke his nose. Well, actually, I broke his nose, grabbed a butcher knife from his kitchen, came back & popped him again, then put the knife to his throat, stared him in the eye & told him if he ever touched me again I’d kill him. Then I kicked my buddy awake dragged him outside & rammed that butcher knife right into that guy’s apartment door. A few years later I saw the guy’s name in the paper. A gang of teenagers had beaten him to death. I imagine that he tried the same shit with one of them only they weren’t as gentle as I was in their response. You’ll have to excuse me if all that story elicited from me was a hearty chuckle. Maybe even a short guffaw.

About 10 years later my wife, then girlfriend, dragged me to a party with her co-workers. One of her workmates was a gay man. He seemed a bit melodramatic but otherwise okay. So, for whatever reason, I spent much of that party drinking & chatting with him & his lover. I don’t remember what inspired him but, at one point, he started telling me some very strange hook-up stories where he’d meet a guy in a bar, go back to the man’s apartment or hotel room only to find 3-4-5 other guys there who were intent on raping him. He would literally have to fight his way out of the room. He said this was not an uncommon occurrence.

My point is that your party line that it’s all “teeny bopper rebellion” & homophobic parents unwilling to accept “queer little Timmy” seems to be one huge pile of disingenuous horseshit that conveniently ignores the fact that there are predators everywhere. Predators who are quite aware of the confusion and tantrum like angst of the average teeny bopper doofus. Predators who are quite willing to exploit their adolescent confusion for their own, often nefarious, purposes.

This may shock you but teeny boppers aren’t filled with wisdom. They’re filled with hormones that confuse & mindfuck them. That’s it. Of course, this being America, entire industries have cropped up to exploit their confusion for profit.

Even the GAO & the Dept. of Education have acknowledged that 10% of all the children that pass through the public education system will be molested by school employees. That inconvenient factoid is always conveniently overlooked by liberal zealots in their dipshit zeal to prove that their motives are pure & above reproach. Yep, pure as the driven slush.

Another great memory from my 15th year involved me sitting in a hospital room with my bawling mother as we stared at my unconscious father who, over the course of 2 days, had 4 heart attacks. I didn’t give a fuck about pissing off my parents. All I wanted was my dad back. Sorry to disappoint you buddy but I had a great relationship with my parents. I miss them both. I understand that’s probably an unfashionable thing to say to a teen angst voyeur like you but, to be honest, you sound like an old codger desperately trying to prove that he/she can still think young. As if anyone cares.

Seriously, could you be more superficial if you tried really fucking hard?

Expand full comment