My name is albert richard lewis. You are not coherent. this is not an ad hominem attack on you. you are not coherent in either comment. you are a sad shadow of crypto-fascist types personified by William F. Buckley--without all that baggage of reasoned argument and making an actual point. But you express that point of view in sloppy…
My name is albert richard lewis. You are not coherent. this is not an ad hominem attack on you. you are not coherent in either comment. you are a sad shadow of crypto-fascist types personified by William F. Buckley--without all that baggage of reasoned argument and making an actual point. But you express that point of view in sloppy generalities. Your profoundish generalizations are unsupported, fatuous. ALL political programmes--left, right, whatever-- have failed and have ended in tyranny. Why reserve pointing out failures of the left? Learn from this, and don't waste time on another snappy reply. Read up on anarchy, for instance. Much anarchy holds that no one--individual, state, church has the right to impose any decision on any individual. that is an outrageous demand of the left--in service of individuals. Anarchist insist that the burden of proof always is on the powerful as basic. Enough. The End
"This is not ad hominem", followed by a stream of juvenile taunts ("crypto-fascist", "sad", "shallow"). If you are going to spew your bile on the internet, at least learn to capitalise proper nouns and the first letter of each sentence. This is grade-school stuff.
My name is albert richard lewis. You are not coherent. this is not an ad hominem attack on you. you are not coherent in either comment. you are a sad shadow of crypto-fascist types personified by William F. Buckley--without all that baggage of reasoned argument and making an actual point. But you express that point of view in sloppy generalities. Your profoundish generalizations are unsupported, fatuous. ALL political programmes--left, right, whatever-- have failed and have ended in tyranny. Why reserve pointing out failures of the left? Learn from this, and don't waste time on another snappy reply. Read up on anarchy, for instance. Much anarchy holds that no one--individual, state, church has the right to impose any decision on any individual. that is an outrageous demand of the left--in service of individuals. Anarchist insist that the burden of proof always is on the powerful as basic. Enough. The End
"This is not ad hominem", followed by a stream of juvenile taunts ("crypto-fascist", "sad", "shallow"). If you are going to spew your bile on the internet, at least learn to capitalise proper nouns and the first letter of each sentence. This is grade-school stuff.