Not sure why you feel the need to disrespect my comments by misquoting me. Where do I "argue how obvious the results would've been otherwise"? I think I made it plain how impossible it would be to derive useful information by simply asking Biden voters four years later if any one them would have changed their minds based on what we only …
Not sure why you feel the need to disrespect my comments by misquoting me. Where do I "argue how obvious the results would've been otherwise"? I think I made it plain how impossible it would be to derive useful information by simply asking Biden voters four years later if any one them would have changed their minds based on what we only know now, since we can't know what would have happened then if the NY Post story hadn't been deliberately repressed.
As to testing the premise "anecdotally"--for whatever value that might yield--I blush to learn that I have the power to stop you from doing that. By all means, have at it!
"Consider how few voters would have had to change their minds to alter the outcome of the election."
And then you backed away from that when I asked if it could be validated by simply asking any Biden voter you know if that is true. Perhaps you do not know a single Biden voter. You'd have to be in a pretty small bubble.
"Would there have been many more questions raised by sources other than the President about Mr. Biden's integrity?"
OK, what sources do you suppose would've done so? NYT? WaPo? CNN?
Not sure why you feel the need to disrespect my comments by misquoting me. Where do I "argue how obvious the results would've been otherwise"? I think I made it plain how impossible it would be to derive useful information by simply asking Biden voters four years later if any one them would have changed their minds based on what we only know now, since we can't know what would have happened then if the NY Post story hadn't been deliberately repressed.
As to testing the premise "anecdotally"--for whatever value that might yield--I blush to learn that I have the power to stop you from doing that. By all means, have at it!
"Consider how few voters would have had to change their minds to alter the outcome of the election."
And then you backed away from that when I asked if it could be validated by simply asking any Biden voter you know if that is true. Perhaps you do not know a single Biden voter. You'd have to be in a pretty small bubble.
"Would there have been many more questions raised by sources other than the President about Mr. Biden's integrity?"
OK, what sources do you suppose would've done so? NYT? WaPo? CNN?