So pointing out the pros and the cons of a policy makes them bad libertarians?
Maybe not everyone is as rigid ideologically. Classical liberalism allows for far more freedom of thought than the tight box you trap yourself in while you chirp about libertarian purity.
So do you think the government funding something is always bad 100% of the…
So pointing out the pros and the cons of a policy makes them bad libertarians?
Maybe not everyone is as rigid ideologically. Classical liberalism allows for far more freedom of thought than the tight box you trap yourself in while you chirp about libertarian purity.
So do you think the government funding something is always bad 100% of the time? I guess I'm not a "true" libertarian... Oh well.
The modern classical liberal and libertarian movements have been around a lot longer than you have. Maybe you should learn some humility instead of acting like RFK's attack dog. Who are you to lecture others on libertarian purity?
What's even remotely libertarian about RFK? lol. What possibly makes you think a libertarian magazine should automatically give good coverage of your cult idol?
The main thing that bothers me about Warp Speed is the liability shields.
Either way, stop expecting every libertarian to have uniform views. It only shows your ignorance.
Its Incredibly laughable to suggest that government/private partnership can work and that they a good thing, its even worse to suggest that and proudly call yourself a libertarian.
Reason exists as think tank, it desired goal is to influence policy and public opinion. Think tanks all have donors they are beholden to, its not a mystery how dc think tanks butter their bread. Reason didn’t like Ron Paul, and they dont particularly get along with the libertarian party.
I’m not a libertarian, never claimed to be one. You should educate yourself on what classical liberalism actually is because it has nothing to do with advocating for government/private vaccine rollouts that result in mass violations of civil liberties.
So pointing out the pros and the cons of a policy makes them bad libertarians?
Maybe not everyone is as rigid ideologically. Classical liberalism allows for far more freedom of thought than the tight box you trap yourself in while you chirp about libertarian purity.
So do you think the government funding something is always bad 100% of the time? I guess I'm not a "true" libertarian... Oh well.
The modern classical liberal and libertarian movements have been around a lot longer than you have. Maybe you should learn some humility instead of acting like RFK's attack dog. Who are you to lecture others on libertarian purity?
What's even remotely libertarian about RFK? lol. What possibly makes you think a libertarian magazine should automatically give good coverage of your cult idol?
The main thing that bothers me about Warp Speed is the liability shields.
Either way, stop expecting every libertarian to have uniform views. It only shows your ignorance.
Its Incredibly laughable to suggest that government/private partnership can work and that they a good thing, its even worse to suggest that and proudly call yourself a libertarian.
Reason exists as think tank, it desired goal is to influence policy and public opinion. Think tanks all have donors they are beholden to, its not a mystery how dc think tanks butter their bread. Reason didn’t like Ron Paul, and they dont particularly get along with the libertarian party.
I’m not a libertarian, never claimed to be one. You should educate yourself on what classical liberalism actually is because it has nothing to do with advocating for government/private vaccine rollouts that result in mass violations of civil liberties.