Your comment is grossly incorrect and probably libelous. Fox did NOT make any such claim of the CIA having killed JFK. They did use the term 'involved'. It is still unclear, and Tucker Carlson's story pointed out, that the CIA is still withholding information that was supposed to have been released in 2017. Also, it's been known since No…
Your comment is grossly incorrect and probably libelous. Fox did NOT make any such claim of the CIA having killed JFK. They did use the term 'involved'. It is still unclear, and Tucker Carlson's story pointed out, that the CIA is still withholding information that was supposed to have been released in 2017. Also, it's been known since November '63 that Oswald served as a CIA operative so, even if only 'arm's length', the CIA had 'involvement'.
carried out the killing. Having read “JFK and The Unspeakable”, “The Devil’s Chessboard”, and “Mary’s Mosaic”, this information, for me, is anti-climactic but I recognize that it packs quite the punch for the average citizen.
As for libel, well, I am not worth suing but if the agency were to do it I would look forward to the discovery.
Your comment is grossly incorrect and probably libelous. Fox did NOT make any such claim of the CIA having killed JFK. They did use the term 'involved'. It is still unclear, and Tucker Carlson's story pointed out, that the CIA is still withholding information that was supposed to have been released in 2017. Also, it's been known since November '63 that Oswald served as a CIA operative so, even if only 'arm's length', the CIA had 'involvement'.
The context of the piece was clearly that the CIA
carried out the killing. Having read “JFK and The Unspeakable”, “The Devil’s Chessboard”, and “Mary’s Mosaic”, this information, for me, is anti-climactic but I recognize that it packs quite the punch for the average citizen.
As for libel, well, I am not worth suing but if the agency were to do it I would look forward to the discovery.