360 Comments

What a strange world, a Reagan Conservative loving the content of a former Rolling Stones reporter! Strange Dayz!

Expand full comment

A political realignment is underway. The left-right paradigm was oversimplified and misleading to begin with, and now it is completely outdated. Now we are seeing people who believe in the values of classical liberalism and Constitutional rights --some "liberal" and some "conservative"-- on one side, and people who want some form of authoritarianism and/or identitarianism on the other side. Authoritarian progressives now call people like Taibbi and Greenwald "right wing" for sticking to their classically liberal principles. Conservatives call the Democrats "socialist" when they are increasingly fascist. The country is ruled by a single party that pretends to be two parties, and many on the "left" and "right" don't believe the government represents them or people like them.

Expand full comment

Excellent comment.

I've been saying similar things both in Substack and Twitter. We've moved from Left'Right to citizens and facists.

Expand full comment

Fascism and socialism are more alike than they are different. Both are authoritarian, collectivistic (family and church are competitors and must be destroyed) and oppose free market and civil liberties like right to own property, free speech etc. One thing socialism excel in, which the fascists never mastered, is the art of gaining control of people's minds through indoctrination, notably in the education system and mass media. For all the violence from fascist groups like Antifa, it's the mind control that scares me most. Especially because most Americans are unable to recognize it as a strategy. Rod Dreher wrote "Live not by lies" after being enlightened by socialism survivors. He's also done several interviews and podcasts. Can definitely recommend.

Expand full comment
founding

Vasiliy Grossman described this very well in Life and Fate, how soviet society used social ostracism very effectively, in addition to the brute force they’re better known for. Also, one of Matt and Walter’s talks speculated ostracism from the “Club” is what has very effectively shut down the news media currently. Sounds plausible to me.

Expand full comment

What is the "Club"?

Expand full comment
founding

I forget which podcast it was, but the idea is a journalist will be excluded from various events, contacts, etc. unless they toe the line. It’s a valid explanation for why the work Matt is doing with the Twitter files is not reported anywhere. (Wall Street Journal finally mentioned it today.)

The description Vasiliy Grossman made is really good, it explains how some suppression doesn’t even need a conspiracy, it runs itself.

Expand full comment

"The description Vasiliy Grossman made is really good, it explains how some suppression doesn’t even need a conspiracy, it runs itself."

It's a very interesting feature to find in societies that provide the latitude for individual self-expression and civil rights protection- that lacking the forcible imposition of authoritarian oppression from above, a large number of individuals opt to voluntarily organize into partisan cliques, and then view everyone who doesn't assent to every last item in their particular embraced groupthink agenda as an existential threat, to both the proper workings of the social order and to their personal well-being.

Expand full comment

I should be a teacher.

Expand full comment

Wow.

I am amazed that someone could cram that much...non factual material...into one post.

Bravo?

Expand full comment

I urge you to study up a bit more on the subjects "fascism" and "socialism" before commenting again. And Rod Dreher and "enlightenment" are two distinct, mutually exclusive, entities. Good day.

Expand full comment

I assume that you disagree but are unwilling or unable to explain why. I can refute or accept rational arguments, not feelings. You apparently dislike Rod Dreher but I have read his book and his depiction of the horrors of socialism through eye witnesses are factual and correct.

Expand full comment

Refer to Glenn’s Venn diagram and commentary that elected representatives of both parties have much more in common with each other than with the voters they profess to represent. The performative political charades they unabashedly act out when the cameras are rolling is no different than watching a televangelist working an adoring crowd, promising salvation for a modest fee.

Expand full comment

The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians.”

― George Orwell, The Lost Orwell: Being a Supplement to The Complete Works of George Orwell

Expand full comment

Orwell's selected Essays Oxford Press 2021 is a must read in 2023.

Nationalism right now is more important than the constitution that Scalia deliberately subverted.

Do I have to draw the lines between the Quebec of 1774 and the Fifth and final intolerable Act.?

The ACT of toleration of 1689 made America Democratic and gave all religion rights but Catholics had fewer rights because their oaths of allegiance were always suspect. Jefferson wrote a Bible for America.

He was a Deist not a Christian or a Roman Catholic or Mormon, or an American Evangelical or even a "liberal Puritan" like Milton. For Jefferson Jesus was a brother.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/how-thomas-jefferson-created-his-own-bible-5659505/

The King James version started the bloodiest war in British history and if things keep up your Evangelicals will use it to destroy us all.

Expand full comment

"identitarianism." Zoroastrians with a taste for mainline Episcopal rituals?

Expand full comment

I THINK WE NEED TO TAKE THIS UP WITH THE ARCHBISHOP.

PIE IN THE SKY WHEN YOU DIE IS SO IRANIAN IT MAY NOT FLY IN FLORIDA WHERE LIFE ON EARTH IS OF SO LITTLE CONSEQUENCE.

AFTER ALL NEVER NEVER LAND IS SO ORLANDO.

MAYBE PETE CAN SING US A SONG ABOUT THAT OLD TIME RELIGION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBtSFhbxBTg

Expand full comment
founding

Just to add, Nassim Taleb commented on the meaningless “Left” vs. “Right” dichotomy years ago.

Expand full comment

Allow me here to assess several things at once: one, the meaninglessness of 95% of anything Nassim Taleb has ever uttered or scrawled, and two, that there has always been a "left" and "right" and there will always be a "left" and "right." Currently in the U.S. these designations have provoked much tiresome and churlish debate.

What is currently true is that both "left" and "right" now consider the other "side" to be "fascist" or "authoritarian," usually a combination of both. What's a neutral observer to make of this?

(And a bonus three): One thing is historically certain too: the libertarians are still assholes, have always been assholes, and will always be assholes.

Expand full comment

I believe this is the turning point we need in our country, the silent majority from all political opinions uniting to expose the corruption that has plagued our nations leadership since the creation of the Federal Reserve. It is happening because individuals with many different political beliefs are standing up for the truth and their values.

Expand full comment

That's the problem though. There needs to be consensus about what an alternative would be, and there isn't one. The two political "tribes" no longer speak to each other, and see each other as enemies. A lot of people don't believe in civil rights for those who don't hold the same views. Until that changes, I don't see how some form of authoritarianism is escapable.

Expand full comment

I was a fan even before it was cool https://billlawrenceonline.com/steve-cordasco-rolling-stone-goldman-sachs/

Expand full comment

Interesting you mention Steve Cordasco. Used to love listening to him on Saturday mornings in Philly. He was the first person, in 2007 & 2008, who talked about something is very wrong in our financial markets and economy. He was the first person who mentioned Taibbi..and his Rolling Stone articles, who I had never heard of before.

Expand full comment

2009! LOL 🤣

Expand full comment

I was Taibbi when Taibbi wasn't cool

Expand full comment

I'm not saying he's "cool", but that he is a fair and professional journalist. Worthy of consideration. He's still a liberal.

Expand full comment

I wonder it Matt considers himself a liberal. He’s always leaned left (like me), but never shied away from following the evidence where it leads. The reason liberals call him a right winger now for publishing the “Twitter Files.”

Expand full comment

Why can’t we be both? Some of my beliefs are liberal, some are conservative. It’s the lies that we’re told by both sides that I detest most.

Expand full comment

As a fellow who worked as a newspaper reporter and editor from the mid 60s until the end of the 70s ....

My old guy judgement about Matt's body of work was that he did not pick sides in the battle of the parties, at least not during the time I began to read his missives here on Substack. Thus I decided to support him on an annual basis.

Honest reporting is becoming increasingly rare.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I don't even know what a conservative or liberal is anymore.

The "cool" thing was just a rift on a country song from way back.

Expand full comment

Conservative has become a 'dirty' word in America. Wonder why that is? Lots of conservative democratic countries all over the world.

Expand full comment

Another one who has been divided and conquered.

Good luck with that.

Expand full comment
founding

Used to read the “eXile” in Moscow many moons ago, and thoroughly enjoyed it!

Expand full comment

Since a bit of nostalgia has crept in--Racket Weekly Reader! Printd

Expand full comment

I was a Reagan Conservative who loved read Rolling Stone. Even when I thought they smoked too much weed over there.

Expand full comment

Seconded

Expand full comment

shit's getting neocon as fuck

Expand full comment

I’ve told dozens of friends: when a right-wing American evangelical starts thinking Bernie supporters, anti-war married-gay men, Clinton era feminists, evolutionary biologists, and Canadian psychologists* make sense, the world is janked.

*i.e., Matt Tiabbi, Glenn Greenwald, Naomi Wolfe, Brett Weinstein, Jordan Peterson

Expand full comment

And vice-versa

Maga4ever

Expand full comment

They all make sense to me because I am totally warped.

I am totally logically and they believe there is something called normal.

I have a label.

I am autistic I have right not a privilege not to be normal in Quebec.

I was born in Quebec before the revolution.

We were a theocracy and we had no right not to be normal.

Jordan Peterson interned at the Douglas Hospital in Verdun. It is a hospital for psychopaths. Jordan was a great scholar./

He knows normals when he sees em.

The last time I saw a psychologist he said I was the sanest person he ever met and much as he enjoyed my government sponsored visits he had clients he could help.

That was 40 years ago.

Sane and normal are not synonyms.

Sometimes they are antonyms.

Read Orwell on Nationalism

https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/notes-on-nationalism/

"What I most wanted to do.....is to make political writing an art."Orwell

Orwell was an artist

Don't mistake schools of journalism with style and substance.

American journalism is all about style.

Art is about subjective truth and logic.

It is metaphysical like Blake and Donne and Escher.

I forgive Americans because they were never told their history. I cannot forgive Peterson he grew up in Fairview a picturesque Alpine Village in Alberta a place of incredible generational privilege.

I believe Freeland not Taibbi but I know Peace River not American journalist culture after Watergate.

In America journalists must entertain and entertainers must inform it called late night television.

Here in Quebec we don't censor independent media we sponsor it.

Their job is number one to inform number two is entertain.

As Vince Lombardi once said entertaining isn't the most important thing it is the only thing.

Expand full comment

John Ralston Saul the Canadian philosopher is the world expert on journalism and he has given up on Western Culture.

Expand full comment

There was a time when I would have likely asked how one could be a Reagan Conservative, but these days it's far more baffling to me how one can be a Biden Liberal.

Expand full comment

Rob it is quite easy.

I am reading Selected Essays George Orwell Oxford Press 2021

The essay on nationalism has the taxonomy of political speech and language. It is a long essay it should an opening semester in every college and university. Orwell opposed Newspeak. He led a Crusade in his Quixotic quest.

Reagan was a National Socialist. His time for choosing speech was radical not conservative and he was a fascist.

Biden is same old same old. That is the definition of conservative like the old Communist politburo of the Soviet era. He is a corporatist from the gilded Age. Delaware has more Corporations than people. Biden is a conservative conservative politically and socially.

I feel like Alice must have felt meeting Humpty Dumpty on his side of the looking glass.

"When I use a word it means exactly what I want it to mean---no more no less."

Humpty Dumpty

Expand full comment

What did you think of Hunter S Thompson? I loved everything he wrote and he wasn't exactly a conservative. LOL.

Expand full comment

He wouldn't be happy with what has become of the Left.

Expand full comment
founding

I wish George Carlin were still around to eviscerate these fools.

Expand full comment

Back in the day, all of the counterculture icons were on the left.

They'd all be disgusted by how the 'Left' has become nothing more than a Orwellian Fascist state.

Expand full comment

Jon

The counter culture? What is the culture it is counter? It is an independent culture have its own culture.

Orson Wells got an Oscar for What's wrong with getting along.

Is it always right to be Right?

Orwell defined politics and society in his essay called Nationalism.

Orwell warned us about Newspeak.

Orwell would call Reagan and Israel fascists and National Socialists.

The essay can be found in Selected Essays George Orwell 2021 Oxford Press. Orwell was not Orwellian.

Expand full comment

Wrote one very good very funny book that caught and rode the strong current of the time, a fairly entertaining political book that offered no real political insights, and whose gifts for self-promotion was his real genius. Not a thinker but a tinkerer, and ultimately one of the great overestimated and overrated authors of the 20th century. He will be completely forgotten in 30 years.

Expand full comment

He was a terrible human being. Entertaining as all hell but he had no principles except to stoke chaos.

Expand full comment

I don't think he was a terrible human being but I do think he was drunk or lit or both for most of the waking day.

Expand full comment

Would you still consider yourself a Reagan conservative now? I get that you were in the past, but knowing what you do now, would you have made that same choice.

Expand full comment

Maybe a Reagan Democrat like James Roosevelt :-)

Believe it or not, I voted for Anderson in 1980.

Expand full comment

Reagan wasn't a conservative. He was a National Socialist like his sponsors Walt Disney and Fred C Koch co-founder of the John Birch Society. I guess you only read American press.

George Orwell tells us political philosophies in his essay on Nationalism.

Orwell was the linguist in proper classifications of political and social philosophies.

It can be found in George Selected Essays Oxford Press 2021

It should be required reading when describing political and social philosophy.

Let us start with taxonomy

Reagan condemned the period between 1933-1964 as America's worst nightmare.

That is rather unconservative. Reagan was an anarchist. Reagan was a nationalist. Reagan's policies were fascist. He was not a conservative.

https://www.amazon.com/Selected-Essays-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0198804172

Expand full comment

You're right. Words mean nothing.

Expand full comment

bobD111

I am just repeating Charles Dodgson Oxford Professor of Logic AKA Lewis Carroll.

When you go chasing rabbits and you know your going to fall and you just ate some kind of mushroom

Humpty Dumpty is not down the Rabbit hole . He is the other side of the mirror.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnJM_jC7j_4

I had the vinyl, I am an old man.

I live in Quebec I know what the dormouse said.

The dormouse is not a mouse it is a mouse that sleeps soundly.

A mouse that sleeps.

Yesterday was Robbie Burns day.

the best laid schemes o'mice and men gang aft agley.

Expand full comment

"Most peculiar momma............ "

Expand full comment

*Monkees reporter

Expand full comment

Ha! I thought it was Taibbi-Kirn (TK).

Expand full comment

That is what I thought too.

Expand full comment

If interested theres been a TK News channel on YouTube for some time

Expand full comment

Speaking of Walter Kirn, whose name had been totally unfamiliar to me, I was hugely impressed to learn from a recent podcast that he was the author of "Up in the Air" - a movie I have enjoyed three times, and one that I found thought-provoking, sensitive, and heartwarming. A movie Hat Trick. Let me amend "impressed" to say "tremendously impressed"!

Expand full comment

Not Taibbi and Kompany?

Expand full comment

Well, it's certainly not Taibbi-Kern with that new title image.

Expand full comment

n.b., it's much better today.

Expand full comment

Yep! Y’all beat me to the punch...

Expand full comment

Me Too - no pun intended 🙄

Expand full comment

I love the noir connection. “"It was a blonde. A blonde to make a bishop kick a hole in a stained-glass window."

Expand full comment
author

One of my favorite lines

Expand full comment

“Silence fell like a wet blanket over the city, muffling its cries. Time to rest, I thought. Time to drink.”

Dig the new branding Matt - keep on rockin’ in the dystopian world. 🤘🏻

Expand full comment

I like it!

WHO'S MAKING ALL THAT RACKET?

It's Matt at Racket!

Expand full comment

As a newspaper guy in the 1980s, who often used "TK" and its spelled-out version: "to kum," I actually loved the TK News moniker.

Can't say I'm in love w/ the Racket, as the connotation is not always positive, but your post just made me like it a little bit more. Hopefully it will grow on me with time.

Wonder if he considered other names, or considered inviting subscribers to participate in a naming contest. (You know, put it out for a vote, like Elon.) Personally I'd love to see something that connotes the objective and independent approaches that to me are Matt's trademark and brand.

Expand full comment

My thoughts immediately went to "Ruckus". Then you even have a theme song!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRhRNgqPlyk (Lyrics warning!!)

Expand full comment

So the other day, my 92-year-old father said, "You know that guy you read on the computer? The one who's father is on the Boston TV station?"

Yes, Dad, Matt Taibbi is Mike Taibbi's son.

"Well, he had an article in the Wall Street Journal. He's a hell of a writer."

Yes, he is.

Keep up the good work, Mike Taibbi's son.

-30-

Expand full comment

Do you have a link to the article? Would like to read it.

Expand full comment

Sorry. No.

Dad gets an actual newspaper--and has never set up his online access. I don't even know the date.

Expand full comment

Ok, thanks.

Expand full comment

I did search through Google and through the WSJ (which I also get) and I don't see anything. Bummer!

Expand full comment

With a name of "Racket," please consider as a frontispiece Eric Hoffer's quote about how "great causes start as movements, become businesses, and degenerate into rackets."

Expand full comment

Perfect. I wish I thought of that.

Expand full comment

The new logo does remind me of Spy Magazine, which was great in its day. Didn't know Walter Kirn worked there. Spy's two founders, Graydon Carter and Kurt Andersen, have certainly taken different paths in life - amazingly, Carter has become the *less* annoying and pompous of the two.

Expand full comment

SPY was incredible. Never realized either that Kirn was an editor! One of the best magazines ever. Looking forward to another great year of reporting.

Expand full comment

IIRC, that was where the 'short fingered vulgarian' tag was first hung on DJT.

Expand full comment

Yes, you are correct. Light, witty, effective. Now Kurt Andersen has become a droning anti-Trump bore. Heavy-handed, off-putting, and not effective at all.

Expand full comment

To quote the late, lamented Walter Monheit: "Oooof!"

Expand full comment

I loved Spy. Was disappointed to see it go. Nice to learn of Walter’s contribution to its excellence.

Expand full comment

I've wondered why there's never been a documentary or book on SPY? It was amazing while it lasted and deserves a Drunk, Stoned Brilliant, Dead type treatment.

Expand full comment

There was a book: "Spy: The Funny Years Hardcover – October 25, 2006"

Not all the humor still works; comedy is perishable. Some of it is still funny, however.

Expand full comment

The Twinkie research article was timeless.

Expand full comment

If you have several days to kill, the entire run of Spy Magazine is archived at Google Books.

Expand full comment

I have a trove on 70s copies of Nat Lamp that I occasionally go through, and I find that the ads are as interesting as the articles.

I'm guessing the back issues of SPY would be the same. The ads give you a real dose of the culture at that time.

Expand full comment

"I'm talking about a cop that's mixed up in drugs. I'm talking about a dishonest cop, a cop who got mixed up in the rackets and got what was coming to him." (Michael Corleone.)

Yes. By all means, Taibbi. We live in the age of rackets. Have at it.

Expand full comment

We've always lived in a world of rackets; you can see them better now but... only if your eyes are open and your mind is open and you choose to look.

Expand full comment

I’m now a member of the Racket Club. I’ve finally made it.

Expand full comment

“It’s Matt from Racket. Care to comment…?” Words to strike fear in the hearts of racketeers….

Expand full comment

Good point! Yeah, that will get them to spill the beans...

Expand full comment

departing from an abbreviation that in at least one community stands for 'team kill' and taking on one that's guaranteed gonna get carpet bombed for 'grift', but congrats on graduating to more than a placeholder name

Expand full comment

In re BLACK MASK, just gonna leave this here. It dates back to when the internet was still kind of good.

https://www.miskatonic.org/slang.html

Expand full comment

Excellent!

And by all means do be careful in what you choose to read in the Miskatonic rare books collection!

Expand full comment

Come to the conventacle, bring along your pentacle, don't get dragged off by a tentacle.

Expand full comment

I’m new to Substack and a big fan of yours! I thought or just assumed that TK stood for Taibbi - Kirn!

Expand full comment

“He didn’t know the right people. That’s all a police record means.”

Expand full comment
Jan 24, 2023·edited Jan 24, 2023

Actually, I think a modern noir magazine would be an interesting read.

Expand full comment

May I suggest an epigram of Dr. Limonov's to go with the name change as a sub-header, à la "Democracy Dies in Darkness?"

"Everything in America has its own mafia."

Expand full comment

how about "people tend to get naughty as fuck around here."

Expand full comment

"Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? Taibbi knows.

https://www.oldradioworld.com/shows/The_Shadow.php

Expand full comment
founding

Lamont Cranston.

Expand full comment
founding

Good one! Except, everything in the world has its own Mafia. I remember a French doctor in Russia describing to me Russia as white Africa. What he meant was everything is done through connections. Pretty much how the whole world works, actually.

Expand full comment