You aren't seriously telling me that "Townhall" is more reliable than "The Hill".
The information in the article you posted is exactly what a Press Secretary covering for her boss would put out. Just like when "what's-his-name" went hiking the Appalachian Trail.
Don't get me wrong though. I'm not saying that "The Hill" is gospel.
My post was suppose to be kind of ironic and hilarious.
You aren't seriously telling me that "Townhall" is more reliable than "The Hill".
The information in the article you posted is exactly what a Press Secretary covering for her boss would put out. Just like when "what's-his-name" went hiking the Appalachian Trail.
Don't get me wrong though. I'm not saying that "The Hill" is gospel.
My post was suppose to be kind of ironic and hilarious.
No, I'm not saying that. Just that The Hill is biased heavily toward the Democrats, based on the articles they list. I am sure Town Hall also is biased, but not worse than The Hill.
You aren't seriously telling me that "Townhall" is more reliable than "The Hill".
The information in the article you posted is exactly what a Press Secretary covering for her boss would put out. Just like when "what's-his-name" went hiking the Appalachian Trail.
Don't get me wrong though. I'm not saying that "The Hill" is gospel.
My post was suppose to be kind of ironic and hilarious.
Thanks for the humor.
No, I'm not saying that. Just that The Hill is biased heavily toward the Democrats, based on the articles they list. I am sure Town Hall also is biased, but not worse than The Hill.
Mark the non-hiker hiker?