"Written," or more likely "compiled," by someone else. Yes, quite obviously. Another helpful Racketeer. "Eric Salzman" appearing under the headline gave it away for me.
But, alas, the piece does appear under the banner ("Racket") of Taibbi's website. It's a Taibbi piece. True, it does not quite successfully achieve the levels of Taibbi's …
"Written," or more likely "compiled," by someone else. Yes, quite obviously. Another helpful Racketeer. "Eric Salzman" appearing under the headline gave it away for me.
But, alas, the piece does appear under the banner ("Racket") of Taibbi's website. It's a Taibbi piece. True, it does not quite successfully achieve the levels of Taibbi's own maudlin tales of MAGA woe, but one is inclined to note the effort nonetheless.
I second Patrick's curiosity. It's confounding to see people in the comment section that mock Taibbi's reporting, as though they weren't paying for it.
"Written," or more likely "compiled," by someone else. Yes, quite obviously. Another helpful Racketeer. "Eric Salzman" appearing under the headline gave it away for me.
But, alas, the piece does appear under the banner ("Racket") of Taibbi's website. It's a Taibbi piece. True, it does not quite successfully achieve the levels of Taibbi's own maudlin tales of MAGA woe, but one is inclined to note the effort nonetheless.
Why do you subscribe?
For the monthly raffles.
I second Patrick's curiosity. It's confounding to see people in the comment section that mock Taibbi's reporting, as though they weren't paying for it.
I'd be paying for it even if I weren't paying for it. What's an extra 7 bucks a month?
Ah, so you've got a problem with Monkey Business? Why am I not surprised with your comment?
Monkey Business? Perelman? Hecht?