I objected loudly and often to the multi-hundred Ivy League psychiatrists who diagnosed Donald Trump with all manner of psychiatric ailments - the ethics of the profession forbid diagnosing a patient one has not met. I agree with Jack Gallagher; the description rhymes with borderline personality disorder. There is a possibility of comorb…
I objected loudly and often to the multi-hundred Ivy League psychiatrists who diagnosed Donald Trump with all manner of psychiatric ailments - the ethics of the profession forbid diagnosing a patient one has not met. I agree with Jack Gallagher; the description rhymes with borderline personality disorder. There is a possibility of comorbidity with hystrionic personality disorder. Whatever else she is, she's not a person happy with her life.
I'm actually not trying to be uncharitable. Consider that her actions, clearly having the effect of controlling the choices of others, if not the result of a disorder, might then be attributable to basic ill-intent. Would that not be much worse than if her actions were attributable to a disorder of some kind, in which case she would be less culpable, to the extent such actions might be pathological?
No one gives a fuck what you think. I’d rather have a president with some ball than one that doesn’t know where the fuck he is. It doesn’t take a dr to see that we currently have a brain dead zombie in the White House.
I objected loudly and often to the multi-hundred Ivy League psychiatrists who diagnosed Donald Trump with all manner of psychiatric ailments - the ethics of the profession forbid diagnosing a patient one has not met. I agree with Jack Gallagher; the description rhymes with borderline personality disorder. There is a possibility of comorbidity with hystrionic personality disorder. Whatever else she is, she's not a person happy with her life.
Ethics? What has ethics got to do with politics?
... so you say that and then say "but I'm not diagnosing anyone if I just say 'the description rhymes with such and such disorder'" 🤣 holy shit man
I'm actually not trying to be uncharitable. Consider that her actions, clearly having the effect of controlling the choices of others, if not the result of a disorder, might then be attributable to basic ill-intent. Would that not be much worse than if her actions were attributable to a disorder of some kind, in which case she would be less culpable, to the extent such actions might be pathological?
No one gives a fuck what you think. I’d rather have a president with some ball than one that doesn’t know where the fuck he is. It doesn’t take a dr to see that we currently have a brain dead zombie in the White House.
I suspect you misread my words. It appears we are in violent agreement.