I never mentioned Soros. I’ll deal in absolutes. I can tell by your taking offense to me calling those jaggoffs exactly what they are that you’ve got a little stinky, sweaty, godless autodidact in you as well.
Buddy my thinking those 2 people had the right to defend their property against a bunch of disgusting, screeching jackals has zero to do with being immature. I genuinely hope they come to your house and close quarters with your person. You’ll get it then.
You don't have a right to defend your property with deadly force. All they had to do was let the crowd walk by. Evidently they are as reactionary and full of fear as you are for some reason. Vigilante law is not the answer and you can plainly see these idiots barely know one end of the weapon from the other which makes them very dangerous. They're lucky they didn't shoot each other.
Uh. The crowd DID "walk by". Which is what they had NOT demonstrated an intent to do prior to the display of weapons. So everybody should have been happy. Except you, of course, but at least you got the opportunity to dump on people. Also, in Missouri they DO have the right to defend their property.
I thought they were paid Soros mercenaries ?? Make up your mind already. I can tell by the ad hominen attack you know you're wrong.
I never mentioned Soros. I’ll deal in absolutes. I can tell by your taking offense to me calling those jaggoffs exactly what they are that you’ve got a little stinky, sweaty, godless autodidact in you as well.
You can't tell your ass from your elbow and the fact you have to make stuff up about people proves you're nothing but a petulant child.
Die slow... comrade.
If you deal in absolutes perhaps dealing with your immaturity and juvenile mannerisms would be a pertinent move ?
Buddy my thinking those 2 people had the right to defend their property against a bunch of disgusting, screeching jackals has zero to do with being immature. I genuinely hope they come to your house and close quarters with your person. You’ll get it then.
You don't have a right to defend your property with deadly force. All they had to do was let the crowd walk by. Evidently they are as reactionary and full of fear as you are for some reason. Vigilante law is not the answer and you can plainly see these idiots barely know one end of the weapon from the other which makes them very dangerous. They're lucky they didn't shoot each other.
"You don't have a right to defend your property with deadly force."
Wherever you got your law degree, I suggest you sue for a refund. They mis-taught you.
Uh. The crowd DID "walk by". Which is what they had NOT demonstrated an intent to do prior to the display of weapons. So everybody should have been happy. Except you, of course, but at least you got the opportunity to dump on people. Also, in Missouri they DO have the right to defend their property.
So the weapons weren't necessary, thanks for proving my point.
No. The weapons were only unnecessary if the crowd would have behaved the way McCloskeys found acceptable without using firearms.
But what the crowd would have done has not been shown.
Wrong again chickenshit. We have the “Castle Doctrine” here in Missouri. Look it up. I live in St. Louis.
You're the chickenshit. You need a gun remember ?
Buddy if you don’t jump your pussy ass off my dick.
Are you triggered now little snowflake ?