15 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Skutch's avatar

I thought they were paid Soros mercenaries ?? Make up your mind already. I can tell by the ad hominen attack you know you're wrong.

Expand full comment
SolidSnakeLRRP's avatar

I never mentioned Soros. I’ll deal in absolutes. I can tell by your taking offense to me calling those jaggoffs exactly what they are that you’ve got a little stinky, sweaty, godless autodidact in you as well.

Expand full comment
Skutch's avatar

You can't tell your ass from your elbow and the fact you have to make stuff up about people proves you're nothing but a petulant child.

Expand full comment
SolidSnakeLRRP's avatar

Die slow... comrade.

Expand full comment
Skutch's avatar

If you deal in absolutes perhaps dealing with your immaturity and juvenile mannerisms would be a pertinent move ?

Expand full comment
SolidSnakeLRRP's avatar

Buddy my thinking those 2 people had the right to defend their property against a bunch of disgusting, screeching jackals has zero to do with being immature. I genuinely hope they come to your house and close quarters with your person. You’ll get it then.

Expand full comment
Skutch's avatar

You don't have a right to defend your property with deadly force. All they had to do was let the crowd walk by. Evidently they are as reactionary and full of fear as you are for some reason. Vigilante law is not the answer and you can plainly see these idiots barely know one end of the weapon from the other which makes them very dangerous. They're lucky they didn't shoot each other.

Expand full comment
saintonge235's avatar

"You don't have a right to defend your property with deadly force."

Wherever you got your law degree, I suggest you sue for a refund. They mis-taught you.

Expand full comment
Trollificus's avatar

Uh. The crowd DID "walk by". Which is what they had NOT demonstrated an intent to do prior to the display of weapons. So everybody should have been happy. Except you, of course, but at least you got the opportunity to dump on people. Also, in Missouri they DO have the right to defend their property.

Expand full comment
Skutch's avatar

So the weapons weren't necessary, thanks for proving my point.

Expand full comment
saintonge235's avatar

No. The weapons were only unnecessary if the crowd would have behaved the way McCloskeys found acceptable without using firearms.

But what the crowd would have done has not been shown.

Expand full comment
SolidSnakeLRRP's avatar

Wrong again chickenshit. We have the “Castle Doctrine” here in Missouri. Look it up. I live in St. Louis.

Expand full comment
Skutch's avatar

You're the chickenshit. You need a gun remember ?

Expand full comment
SolidSnakeLRRP's avatar

Buddy if you don’t jump your pussy ass off my dick.

Expand full comment
Skutch's avatar

Are you triggered now little snowflake ?

Expand full comment