I actually see an intersection between real left and right as we are both anti intervention war and Tulsi connected us on this point . The docs should not have been so easy to access but I’m glad the kid did leak them cause we now know once again gov lied to us about proxy war. To your point the republicans are now the party of working c…
I actually see an intersection between real left and right as we are both anti intervention war and Tulsi connected us on this point . The docs should not have been so easy to access but I’m glad the kid did leak them cause we now know once again gov lied to us about proxy war. To your point the republicans are now the party of working clsss and Dems the elite . It’s reversed so I see your point but trump knows he lied about election fraud. The twitter files however reveal election interference by banning Biden laptop story
So while Trump might not have conclusive proof of election fraud, NO one has concrete evidence of the VALIDITY of the election. As such, and in light of the many anomalies that somehow plagued the Democratic primaries, but not the Republican ones, and the anomalies that appeared on election night in the 2020 general election, I assume that it was rigged until proven otherwise. And of course it CAN'T be proven otherwise.
But other than that, I agree. The GOP, having allowed Trump, whom they hate, to win the nomination, showed itself to be the only pro-democracy party on the ballot, both in 2016 and 2020. And some of them are taking a stand against censorship, and the authoritarian COVID response. Perhaps they're doing so cynically, but nevertheless, they deserve credit for doing it.
Trump admitted no election fraud but pressured Georgia elections officials to find votes. No election fraud evidence. But DNC did throw Bernie under the bus at Iowa caucus 2020 w shadow inc and w Debbie wasserman 2016 so definitely election interference hurt Bernie who very possibly could have beat trump 2016 but Hillary was chosen by DNC
My point is that regardless of what Trump "admitted," US elections lack even the most basic mechanisms to ensure integrity, and should therefore always be presumed fraudulent until proven otherwise. But in 2016 and 2020 there too many statistical anomalies, most in favor of Clinton, in the primary or Biden in the general, for any reasonable person to conclude that they were transparent or fair.
There has been no evidence that 2920 elections were fraudulent. There were issues in 2016 in San Diego w Dem primaries and votes not counted but unless I see evidence about 2020 I won’t assume fraud
Of course you're totally free to assume validity until there is evidence of fraud, just as angelO is free to assume fraud until there is evidence of validity.
When a new medicine is created, you can assume it's safe until it is proven to be harmful, or you can assume it's harmful until it's proven to be safe.
These are all valid strategies with different pros and cons.
Elections are not PRESUMED to be valid. Particularly in the absence of verification mechanisms. Which means that there has been no evidence that the election was valid.
And San Diego? What about the whole STATE of Cali being called the night before the primary? The millions of lost voter registrations all over the country, mostly among new registrants who were identified as Bernie supporters in the Democrats' database? The caucuses where establishment Dems refused - REFUSED - to disclose tallies? The coin flips in Iowa that somehow all went Hillary's way?
You're either out of your depth, hopelessly naive, or you're a DNC shill, so I'm done with you. If you're the former, go educate yourself. If the latter, fuck off.
"...As such, and in light of the many anomalies that somehow plagued the Democratic primaries, but not the Republican ones, and the anomalies that appeared on election night in the 2020 general election, I assume that it was rigged until proven otherwise. And of course it CAN'T be proven otherwise."
A quintessential demonstration of the reasoning of an average Racket News commenter. Go to the head of the class, angelO.
I actually see an intersection between real left and right as we are both anti intervention war and Tulsi connected us on this point . The docs should not have been so easy to access but I’m glad the kid did leak them cause we now know once again gov lied to us about proxy war. To your point the republicans are now the party of working clsss and Dems the elite . It’s reversed so I see your point but trump knows he lied about election fraud. The twitter files however reveal election interference by banning Biden laptop story
"Trump knows he lied"? The US has the worst election integrity in the "civilized" world, and ranks lower than some developing nations:
https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/eip-blog/2017/1/7/its-even-worse-than-the-news-about-north-carolina-american-elections-rank-last-among-all-western-democracies
So while Trump might not have conclusive proof of election fraud, NO one has concrete evidence of the VALIDITY of the election. As such, and in light of the many anomalies that somehow plagued the Democratic primaries, but not the Republican ones, and the anomalies that appeared on election night in the 2020 general election, I assume that it was rigged until proven otherwise. And of course it CAN'T be proven otherwise.
But other than that, I agree. The GOP, having allowed Trump, whom they hate, to win the nomination, showed itself to be the only pro-democracy party on the ballot, both in 2016 and 2020. And some of them are taking a stand against censorship, and the authoritarian COVID response. Perhaps they're doing so cynically, but nevertheless, they deserve credit for doing it.
Trump admitted no election fraud but pressured Georgia elections officials to find votes. No election fraud evidence. But DNC did throw Bernie under the bus at Iowa caucus 2020 w shadow inc and w Debbie wasserman 2016 so definitely election interference hurt Bernie who very possibly could have beat trump 2016 but Hillary was chosen by DNC
My point is that regardless of what Trump "admitted," US elections lack even the most basic mechanisms to ensure integrity, and should therefore always be presumed fraudulent until proven otherwise. But in 2016 and 2020 there too many statistical anomalies, most in favor of Clinton, in the primary or Biden in the general, for any reasonable person to conclude that they were transparent or fair.
By "reasonable person" do you mean "conspiracy-addled Person."
Confused in the Land of Reality.
There has been no evidence that 2920 elections were fraudulent. There were issues in 2016 in San Diego w Dem primaries and votes not counted but unless I see evidence about 2020 I won’t assume fraud
Of course you're totally free to assume validity until there is evidence of fraud, just as angelO is free to assume fraud until there is evidence of validity.
When a new medicine is created, you can assume it's safe until it is proven to be harmful, or you can assume it's harmful until it's proven to be safe.
These are all valid strategies with different pros and cons.
"I won't assume fraud"
That's not now any of this works.
Elections are not PRESUMED to be valid. Particularly in the absence of verification mechanisms. Which means that there has been no evidence that the election was valid.
And San Diego? What about the whole STATE of Cali being called the night before the primary? The millions of lost voter registrations all over the country, mostly among new registrants who were identified as Bernie supporters in the Democrats' database? The caucuses where establishment Dems refused - REFUSED - to disclose tallies? The coin flips in Iowa that somehow all went Hillary's way?
You're either out of your depth, hopelessly naive, or you're a DNC shill, so I'm done with you. If you're the former, go educate yourself. If the latter, fuck off.
"...As such, and in light of the many anomalies that somehow plagued the Democratic primaries, but not the Republican ones, and the anomalies that appeared on election night in the 2020 general election, I assume that it was rigged until proven otherwise. And of course it CAN'T be proven otherwise."
A quintessential demonstration of the reasoning of an average Racket News commenter. Go to the head of the class, angelO.