While it is given that MSM mouthpieces such as the WaPo frequently publish inaccurate information, including wacky conspiracy theories, it's only "disinformation" or worse, "lies" when that information does not align with the Establishment line at the moment.
However, publishing something that people of influence and authority do not want…
While it is given that MSM mouthpieces such as the WaPo frequently publish inaccurate information, including wacky conspiracy theories, it's only "disinformation" or worse, "lies" when that information does not align with the Establishment line at the moment.
However, publishing something that people of influence and authority do not want to see in print is "propaganda", "disinformation" or "lies" even if entirely factually true as supported by substantial evidence.
While it is given that MSM mouthpieces such as the WaPo frequently publish inaccurate information, including wacky conspiracy theories, it's only "disinformation" or worse, "lies" when that information does not align with the Establishment line at the moment.
However, publishing something that people of influence and authority do not want to see in print is "propaganda", "disinformation" or "lies" even if entirely factually true as supported by substantial evidence.
Exactly right.