3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
DC Reade's avatar

Right. You notice the problem- when it’s on the other side. And only then.

The next level of faulty critical thinking is when you have some acquaintance with logical fallacies and are able point out which ones they are and how the facts are being abused by the other side, but you never notice them when you employ them or support them yourself.

For what it’s worth. Just in case you’ve made it that far.

If Paul’s points are faulty and you aren’t refuting them with the detailed specifics that contradict his claims, you’re just being lazy. Razzing someone is easy. But it isn’t exercise. It’s self-indulgence.

Expand full comment
McExpat's avatar

Made it through it. Would gladly start a new thread about everything I think is wrong with Right wing politics. He presented noting new. It’s a dead horse.

Expand full comment
DC Reade's avatar

Personally, I don't mind unpacking old controversies and making points about old events. Every time I do it, I feel like my knowledge command has sharpened just a little bit more. It's enjoyable for me. Sometimes I find some new insight that I've previously overlooked.

I don't know exactly how many other Internet comment writers share that predilection. But I do know that when someone says "nobody" does that, or likes to do it, they're talking over their own head.

Expand full comment
ErrorError