Please add the Green Card application (link below) it is very relevant for the discussion about free speech and the green card. Part 943F under the security section of the green card clearly relates to Hamas. According to the administration, if Hamas supporters are in the United States under these visas or green cards, they would’ve had …
Please add the Green Card application (link below) it is very relevant for the discussion about free speech and the green card. Part 943F under the security section of the green card clearly relates to Hamas. According to the administration, if Hamas supporters are in the United States under these visas or green cards, they would’ve had to declare this on their application. If they had declared it, they would not have been admitted, therefore they have perjured themselves by not listing Hamas as an organization that they support.
Ken Klippstein also has a document of which congressman came out and support of Khali and others commented on his post with an updated document as well. He asks why more people did not sign in support of Khali.
There is a simple question here about the government being able to decide which foreign nationals are allowed to be in the country. If you perjure yourself on the green card by not listing the organizations you support and are affiliated with then you are guilty of perjury, and your green card can be revoked.
If on the other hand, you list Hamas as one of your organizations, and you are admitted as a permanent resident, then you have not perjured yourself and there shouldn’t be a legal issue.
So this really is the question of whether or not the government has a right to enforce the laws regarding green cards and perjury, especially in the section about security.
Please add the Green Card application (link below) it is very relevant for the discussion about free speech and the green card. Part 943F under the security section of the green card clearly relates to Hamas. According to the administration, if Hamas supporters are in the United States under these visas or green cards, they would’ve had to declare this on their application. If they had declared it, they would not have been admitted, therefore they have perjured themselves by not listing Hamas as an organization that they support.
Ken Klippstein also has a document of which congressman came out and support of Khali and others commented on his post with an updated document as well. He asks why more people did not sign in support of Khali.
There is a simple question here about the government being able to decide which foreign nationals are allowed to be in the country. If you perjure yourself on the green card by not listing the organizations you support and are affiliated with then you are guilty of perjury, and your green card can be revoked.
If on the other hand, you list Hamas as one of your organizations, and you are admitted as a permanent resident, then you have not perjured yourself and there shouldn’t be a legal issue.
So this really is the question of whether or not the government has a right to enforce the laws regarding green cards and perjury, especially in the section about security.
https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/i-485.pdf