I've just read the 33 pages of the 2004-2007 Maxwell Poll reference link from which that Wall Street Pit article claims to draw its statistical claims.
The claimed data specifics are not found in that source.
I've just read the 33 pages of the 2004-2007 Maxwell Poll reference link from which that Wall Street Pit article claims to draw its statistical claims.
The claimed data specifics are not found in that source.
Also, no one is going to find a link address that is improperly typed. The live link for the Wall Street Pit article that you apparently intended to reference is
The majority of welfare recipients (80%) are democrats. Is it any wonder that democratic politicians formulate policy which caters to the non productive componants of society, relative to the working people. This is the constituency of the democratic party, which has come to expect votes in exchange for handouts.
The Vast Majority Of Welfare Recipients Are Democrats ...
The Vast Majority Of Welfare Recipients Are Democrats Posted on October 4, 2013 by stevengoddard 63% of welfare recipients are black or Hispanic, and those groups vote overwhelmingly Democratic.
Liberals always say Whites take most of the welfare but they are the most of the population. That's what Huff Post does. The correct way is to find the % of the individual groups that are on Welfare. If there were the same amount of Latinos as Whites, Latinos would be using TWICE as much Welfare as Whites.
Postipressionist: now- since your earlier attempts to support your claims have failed- you're reduced to offering "references" that consist of unsupported canards found in the City-Data Forum (not the site itself, which is a fairly reliable metric data resource) and a blog by one rando issuing a blatantly inaccurate conclusion drawn from a single-variable data comparison that does not say what he claims it says.
Ironically, the guy's blog is named "Real Science" (he name-checks Richard Feynman!). And he can't even properly parse an elementary-level statistical inference.
To cut to the chase: according to the linked chart (data from 2003), the percentage of families (no locale shown in the data reference- Iowa? Chicago? the U.S.? Oz?) receiving "welfare":
White: 32%
Black 38%
Hispanic: 25%
And here's the takeaway that the resident data analyst comes up with, as the conclusion:
"63% of welfare recipients are black or Hispanic"
Yeah, he literally added together the two numbers for "teh minorities" from that chart, and came up with that whopper.
It apparently didn't occur to him that there are twice as many "non-Hispanic whites" in the US as the combined black and Hispanic population.
Nor was Real Science Guy able to realize that according to the survey chart he linked, the proportion of the black American population receiving "welfare" (unspecified) is less than 20% higher than the percentage of whites, and that proportion of the surveyed Hispanic population receiving welfare benefits is actually around 25% lower than that of the white population.
And then he uses that F-level statistical interpretation to draw this sinister linkage: "those groups vote overwhelmingly Democratic." So much for data precision. And using metrics and math to draw accurate statistical interpretations.
The final guffaw in this laughfest is that your post also offers conclusions in your last paragraph that disregard the fact that according to the data source you've linked, the percentage of Latino Americans (aka "Hispanics") getting welfare is actually LESS than the percentage of white Americans who get it. So to address your data projection, if there were the same amount of Latino Americans as white Americans and those percentages remained the same, the Latinos would be drawing around 25% LESS in welfare than the equivalent sized white population. Not "TWICE as much", lol.
(fwiw, the "non-Hispanic white" population currently outnumbers the Hispanic population by a factor of more than 4 to 1.)
This is basic 6th/7th grade math. It looks like you need a refresher course in it.
You didn't bother to read my comment. What % of Whites are on Welfare not the population. The population changes. When there are the same amount of Latinos and Whites, Latinos will be using TWICE as much Welfare as Whites.
The Census welfare statistics by race show that non-Hispanic white Americans used only 13.2% of governmental assistance. The racial breakdown of welfare recipients covers the period from 2009-2012 and places Asians next on the list with 17.8%. Hispanic and African American citizens received respective 45.7% and 48.6% of welfare support, show the welfare recipients by race stats. Among those, 56.3% of African Americans and 43.6% of Hispanic people participated between 37-48 months.
You have fallen into the SCEWED reporting of facts. Democrats do not count the 260,000 DACA children on Welfare as being in the household of Unauthorized. They separate the children and put them under single stats to remove them from the DEPENDENT family and make them Citizens. you wouldn't know except they are Latino and that is how we know.
It costs $12,600 to teach one for a year (if the do not need Special Ed 20% more) X 260,000 = 3,276,000,000
AVERAGE Medical Costs per capita a year children $2,000 X 260,000 = 520,000,000
Biden gave $3,000 for each child COVID MONEY. - $780,000
$3,277,000,000 total Without WIC, SNAP, TANIF, Housing. and $300. a month (Biden).
This is not reported as a DACA expense.
Are you getting the picture? JUST FOR 260,000 kids born of Illegal Aliens.
of course I read your comment. I was responding to the threadbare link support you offered for your claims.
And your reply simply moved on, to another set of claims and a different link for support. One that's equally incoherent, at least as far as the particular claim that you appear to be referencing:
"The Census welfare statistics by race show that non-Hispanic white Americans used only 13.2% of governmental assistance. The racial breakdown of welfare recipients covers the period from 2009-2012 and places Asians next on the list with 17.8%. Hispanic and African American citizens received respective 45.7% and 48.6% of welfare support, show the welfare recipients by race stats."
What does that passage even mean? The language of the claim would appear to indicate that the stated percentages refer to the fraction of total government assistance. But when combined, they add up to more than 100%! 125.3%, to be exact. That does not compute.
I've just read the 33 pages of the 2004-2007 Maxwell Poll reference link from which that Wall Street Pit article claims to draw its statistical claims.
The claimed data specifics are not found in that source.
https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/campbell/programs/Merged_Data_Set/
Also, no one is going to find a link address that is improperly typed. The live link for the Wall Street Pit article that you apparently intended to reference is
https://wallstreetpit.com/89671-are-welfare-recipients-mostly-republican/
Most welfare recipients are democrats
http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/1687053-most-welfare-recipients-democrats-9.html
The majority of welfare recipients (80%) are democrats. Is it any wonder that democratic politicians formulate policy which caters to the non productive componants of society, relative to the working people. This is the constituency of the democratic party, which has come to expect votes in exchange for handouts.
The Vast Majority Of Welfare Recipients Are Democrats ...
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/the-vast-majority-of-welfare-recipients-are-democrats/
The Vast Majority Of Welfare Recipients Are Democrats Posted on October 4, 2013 by stevengoddard 63% of welfare recipients are black or Hispanic, and those groups vote overwhelmingly Democratic.
Liberals always say Whites take most of the welfare but they are the most of the population. That's what Huff Post does. The correct way is to find the % of the individual groups that are on Welfare. If there were the same amount of Latinos as Whites, Latinos would be using TWICE as much Welfare as Whites.
Postipressionist: now- since your earlier attempts to support your claims have failed- you're reduced to offering "references" that consist of unsupported canards found in the City-Data Forum (not the site itself, which is a fairly reliable metric data resource) and a blog by one rando issuing a blatantly inaccurate conclusion drawn from a single-variable data comparison that does not say what he claims it says.
Ironically, the guy's blog is named "Real Science" (he name-checks Richard Feynman!). And he can't even properly parse an elementary-level statistical inference.
Here's the single chart that he references (from a now-dead reference link): https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/screenhunter_1248-oct-03-23-01.jpg?w=640&h=342
(Maybe someone can find useful leads to the source of this now-dead link from its URL: https://resources.oncourse.iu.edu/access/content/group/SP10-BL-POLS-Y490-26253/schram-contextualizing welfare policy.pdf )
To cut to the chase: according to the linked chart (data from 2003), the percentage of families (no locale shown in the data reference- Iowa? Chicago? the U.S.? Oz?) receiving "welfare":
White: 32%
Black 38%
Hispanic: 25%
And here's the takeaway that the resident data analyst comes up with, as the conclusion:
"63% of welfare recipients are black or Hispanic"
Yeah, he literally added together the two numbers for "teh minorities" from that chart, and came up with that whopper.
It apparently didn't occur to him that there are twice as many "non-Hispanic whites" in the US as the combined black and Hispanic population.
Nor was Real Science Guy able to realize that according to the survey chart he linked, the proportion of the black American population receiving "welfare" (unspecified) is less than 20% higher than the percentage of whites, and that proportion of the surveyed Hispanic population receiving welfare benefits is actually around 25% lower than that of the white population.
And then he uses that F-level statistical interpretation to draw this sinister linkage: "those groups vote overwhelmingly Democratic." So much for data precision. And using metrics and math to draw accurate statistical interpretations.
The final guffaw in this laughfest is that your post also offers conclusions in your last paragraph that disregard the fact that according to the data source you've linked, the percentage of Latino Americans (aka "Hispanics") getting welfare is actually LESS than the percentage of white Americans who get it. So to address your data projection, if there were the same amount of Latino Americans as white Americans and those percentages remained the same, the Latinos would be drawing around 25% LESS in welfare than the equivalent sized white population. Not "TWICE as much", lol.
(fwiw, the "non-Hispanic white" population currently outnumbers the Hispanic population by a factor of more than 4 to 1.)
This is basic 6th/7th grade math. It looks like you need a refresher course in it.
You didn't bother to read my comment. What % of Whites are on Welfare not the population. The population changes. When there are the same amount of Latinos and Whites, Latinos will be using TWICE as much Welfare as Whites.
24+ Welfare Statistics - 2021 Update | Balancing Everything
https://balancingeverything.com/welfare-statistics/
The Census welfare statistics by race show that non-Hispanic white Americans used only 13.2% of governmental assistance. The racial breakdown of welfare recipients covers the period from 2009-2012 and places Asians next on the list with 17.8%. Hispanic and African American citizens received respective 45.7% and 48.6% of welfare support, show the welfare recipients by race stats. Among those, 56.3% of African Americans and 43.6% of Hispanic people participated between 37-48 months.
You have fallen into the SCEWED reporting of facts. Democrats do not count the 260,000 DACA children on Welfare as being in the household of Unauthorized. They separate the children and put them under single stats to remove them from the DEPENDENT family and make them Citizens. you wouldn't know except they are Latino and that is how we know.
It costs $12,600 to teach one for a year (if the do not need Special Ed 20% more) X 260,000 = 3,276,000,000
AVERAGE Medical Costs per capita a year children $2,000 X 260,000 = 520,000,000
Biden gave $3,000 for each child COVID MONEY. - $780,000
$3,277,000,000 total Without WIC, SNAP, TANIF, Housing. and $300. a month (Biden).
This is not reported as a DACA expense.
Are you getting the picture? JUST FOR 260,000 kids born of Illegal Aliens.
of course I read your comment. I was responding to the threadbare link support you offered for your claims.
And your reply simply moved on, to another set of claims and a different link for support. One that's equally incoherent, at least as far as the particular claim that you appear to be referencing:
"The Census welfare statistics by race show that non-Hispanic white Americans used only 13.2% of governmental assistance. The racial breakdown of welfare recipients covers the period from 2009-2012 and places Asians next on the list with 17.8%. Hispanic and African American citizens received respective 45.7% and 48.6% of welfare support, show the welfare recipients by race stats."
What does that passage even mean? The language of the claim would appear to indicate that the stated percentages refer to the fraction of total government assistance. But when combined, they add up to more than 100%! 125.3%, to be exact. That does not compute.
This is the 3rd time explaining this to you.
EXAMPLE
1,000 white people 200 people are on Welfare= 20%
5 Black people 4 people are on Welfare = 80%
3 Asian people 1 person is on Welfare = % 33.33
That's 130%.
It is the amount of use of EACH individual group in respect to THEIR total population that shows what each group needs.
When all populations become equal in number which would be using the most.
This is a middle school question.