654 Comments
User's avatar
Brad's avatar

Matt is a nuisance, a nagging source of cognitive dissonance, and his moral integrity and fidelity to the truth is a supreme inconvenience for people who reside in the modern Democratic bubble, which imposes conformism through mutual surveillance. His living example is also a humiliation to mainstream media wordcels, because they're pretty much required to lie at this point.

Expand full comment
badnabor's avatar

My views reside somewhere between Libertarianism and Conservatism and while I agree with your assessment that a Democratic bubble exists and demands conformity, I feel strongly that it is actually more of a globalists bubble, as evidenced by the neocon Republicans. Their is a long list of politicians from both sides of the aisle that consistently vote against the sovereign interests of American citizens while diverting the easily swayed with much hand waving and heated rhetoric about the latest social injustices.

Expand full comment
Meredith Hobbs's avatar

Neocon warmongers have migrated to the Democratic Party, led by Dick Cheney.

Expand full comment
Gogs's avatar

And it's apotheosis for the Democrats, now officially the party of war. Oh what joy!

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

They’ve been the party of war for a long time.

Expand full comment
Lightwing's avatar

I gave up after Kerry refused to push back against the Iraq war. I realized they were never going to care about the lost American wealth and the lost American lives (none of them from the upper class, mind you). They didn't even care that the war was initiated based on a lie. They just wanted that war and they literally "sold" it to the American people.

Our leadership is corrupt as f*ck. I don't think there's anyone in power that cares about the founding ideals of this country anymore. Maybe a few, but not enough. I'm so, so sick of the elites and their neurotic bs and avarice.

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

I gave up after Barack Obama continued every single one of the Bush Administration's endless wars and then added a couple of his own. He also continued nearly every Bush domestic policy, as well.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Millions of people here and abroad protested that war. I did as well.

And Bush and Co just did it anyway.

Same with Afghanistan.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Plenty of corruption amongst our peerless leaders.

At the same time this system is working precisely as designed. The class of people that designed it are the same class in power now.

I would encourage you to not give up. Elections are useless for a number of reasons I’d rather avoid discussing as I find it dull. Instead of giving up, spend your no doubt considerable energies engaged in some kind of political, civil society group. You obviously care about the affairs of the country, don’t let that care go to waste.

Expand full comment
Debbie Mitchell's avatar

Wow… I am in agreement with your first comment “They’ve been the party of war for a long time.” However your further statements went off, in my opinion, into a rant mirroring exactly what you apparently are accusing.

This can be a place of discussion and dialogue. However that would require a tone of curiosity rather than judgement.

Why is it that forming questions and encouraging engagement is so lacking in most places?

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

You must be new to this neighborhood. This is not a space for discussion and engagement.

Any effort to engage in a discussion of someone’s post is always met with ridicule and dismissal based on “tone.”

Why is forming questions and discussion encouraging engagement so lacking?

I don’t find it lacking IRL but it is certainly lacking here.

Sometimes the gap is much too wide to bridge. How do I engage with someone that insists Kamala is a Marxist and Trump is fighting Democratic Party pedophiles? What’s the point?

Expand full comment
John Holmes's avatar

Who can forget when the Joy Goddess promised, "the most lethal military in the world." Dick Cheney got shivers down his leg at that.

Expand full comment
Craig's avatar

Thanks for that image. Now I need mind bleach.

Expand full comment
Susan Steffner's avatar

Where is the 'JOY' in Genocide?

Expand full comment
Norma Bown's avatar

they actually melded together naturally, two sets of corrupt elitists who use the American ideals we once held as some sort of shield covering their dirty lives and their dirty money, blood money. All our fine moralists who feed on the flesh of other nations sent to die for our greedy purposes.

Expand full comment
ResistWeMuch's avatar

dont say "our". I take no responsibility. it may be a democracy, and I did vote, but Ive never been represented. this is not my government. it does not have my consent.

Expand full comment
Hawker's avatar

What do you take responsibility for?

Expand full comment
Lightwing's avatar

This is so apt.

Expand full comment
Winston Wins's avatar

They see the ivy league, SJW woke dogma as a superior means of State and Corporate Control. Look at all the shit they're getting away with under a Democrat. So many fool still believe the only means of authoritarianism is through the 3rd reich 30s style, Anglo Fascism. They're smarter than that. They don't give a piss about the ideology itself, only how effective it is as a means of control.

Expand full comment
DMC's avatar

the funny thing with cheyney is it reminds me of the guy who puts up an injured player who is out for the season up for trade in fantasy football. and someone trades for him!!!

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

And don't forget Team Neocon traded two all stars - RFK, Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard - for him.

Expand full comment
Taras's avatar

Meredith — I think Dick Cheney feels he has to support his idiot daughter, come what may.

Expand full comment
Norma Bown's avatar

no, she thinks she has to make Daddy proud! Cheney is a mean-spirited narrow-minded man who guards his own interests jealously. Trump disrespected the corrupt old Don and he and his crowd of Bushies cling together, things of the past. The party has moved far beyond the Bushes and the Cheneys now. Their loss is immaterial.

Expand full comment
John Holmes's avatar

All the younger neocons also endorse Harris. They are onboard for new democracy-spreading crusades.

Expand full comment
Susan Steffner's avatar

Not true...their Evil slime has slicked the path for current and future Calumny and greater Evil....as we now see in Lebanon...Diabolical....now our devices are truly life threatening....iPhone warfare !

Expand full comment
Norma Bown's avatar

this new spawn wreaking havoc are just springing from the seeds we planted in these almost four decades (and more in honesty) of ravaging the world with "democracy" and "air campaigns" and "military aid to Ukraine" and Saving the World from WMD or ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!

Expand full comment
BeadleBlog's avatar

He could have easily said he supported his daughter making up her own mind. I support my children making their own choices, even when I come to a different opinion about issues. But he didn't say that and it's no surprise to me since I've always despised Cheney.

Expand full comment
Susan Steffner's avatar

Mention of his name makes me Retch !

Expand full comment
Marie Silvani's avatar

He’s probably mentally not all there either

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

09/19/24: Very good, sir. Don't apologize for material worth reading and publicizing. One suggestion. Stop creating "sing-song" with identically long sentences. Say more with less; break it up with short, emphatic statements. You'll be surprised how much more attractive your work will be. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Savi_heretic33's avatar

His writing style is why I read him.

Expand full comment
Virg's avatar

That is true for the most obvious people. But there are plenty of them in the Republican ranks across the red districts of the country, including many quietly working against Trump and pushing funding for Ukraine. They are by far the majority. They don't call it the uni-party for nothing.

Expand full comment
ResistWeMuch's avatar

I think they've always been there. go back and look at the roll call votes for Iraq war. you (along with many of us) are just being red-pilled.

Expand full comment
DMC's avatar

Im not an expert but except for Cheyney i think the correct term is "returned."

Expand full comment
Marie Silvani's avatar

I agree there are some unsavory republicans, Cheney would have been one I could have feared but he’s gone. The visceral hate among the democratic partners their ability to lie with impunity, their intimidation tactics, it’s really shocking me. The mere fact they blame TRUMPS words for his assassination attempts without any blame themselves. It’s mind boggling. Matt please be careful. You and I don’t always align on the same political spectrum, but I know in my heart there’s earnest in you. And if not said enough, you and the other warriors that are fighting this battle to find truth, we thank you.

Expand full comment
Winston Wins's avatar

This began with Republicans, not just a few a few unsavory Republicans either. The whole Security State thing was their baby. I remember that far back. This a big part of how Obama got elected. He vowed to get us out of the Patriot Act and jail the Bankers and Wall Street hooligans that criminally crashed the economy.

He not only didn't do what he said but empowered these force. But he didn't do it in the open. Much of what went on was found out later. There is always a need for controled op.

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

YES, thank you Matt. You give steel to my mettle!

Expand full comment
Winston Wins's avatar

As someone who is somewhere between libertarianism and old school, "means of production" leftism I am inclined to agree. The Necons don't like Trump's anti Nato rhetoric. They also see the Ivy League WOKE SJW/"though shalt not question the 'experts"' dogma of the Establishment infiltrated progressive as the religion of the future. Of course this all ties into Globalism and all that good stuff which is far more extensive than a I have time for right now as I get ready for work. Lol.

In short it is crucial that people understand in 2024 and beyond the real political enemy of today isn't necessarily the person you disagree with but the person who wishes to take away your right to disagree.

Expand full comment
Jake's avatar

Good analysis. One thing the right is clearly missing is a cohesive platform and conservative vision. Perhaps Vance, if successful in this election can provide some framework for this, but it’s going to be an uphill battle while he tries to balance tempering Trump’s rhetoric with corrections and contextual elaboration to television news hosts that are perpetually in a state of hysteria (I would argue is cosmetic and performative for most, not to mention the epitome of hypocrisy). When the only unifying (using this term loosely) figure for republicans dies, if there’s not a clear center of power and direction, the splitting factions of the right in a chaotic socio-political environment has as much potential for worsening the general atmosphere. To the degree that the left is off the deep end, a fractured right with factions vying for power and recognition will almost certainly exacerbate the chaos.

Expand full comment
Lightwing's avatar

Vance should temper his own rhetoric first.

Expand full comment
Jake's avatar

No argument there- but I’m not sure if that’s his rhetoric or if he feels compelled or has been subtly instructed to back Trump no matter what. Your point still stands, however. I think if I were Vance, I’d be making the following calculations:

If I don’t at least appear to be in lockstep agreement with Trump, it hurts chances of being elected no matter which way you slice it.

I only have to endure one term and even though Trump is pretty fucking far from a classical republican, it’s still better than losing.

This is my only chance at NOT fading into obscurity and it’s plausible that if he gets defeated in a general election, that hurts his chances at another senate term.

So is it HIS rhetoric? Well, it came from his mouth. But I have a feeling he’s playing a calculated long game.

Expand full comment
Kevin Schilling's avatar

well said

Expand full comment
RSgva's avatar

As Matt has already described, rooting domestic repression in foreign policy agencies is the perfect way to enlist bureaucrats who have no clue about the US Constitution and Bill of Rights (nor are they beholden to, or even familiar with, any inter-agency review process that would normally kick in for domestic regulations of any kind.)

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

somewhere between Libertarianism and Conservatism

So you don’t want to pay taxes or pass a test to operate a motor vehicle buuuuut you do want to use State coercion to keep women from having abortions.

And of course. Nothing says nonconformist like conservative and libertarian.

Expand full comment
Liz's avatar

Wow, that is a lot of ssumptions I would not make from this comment.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Oh really? The stifling binary he can’t stop repeating didn’t give it away? Or are you stuck in it as well?

Expand full comment
badnabor's avatar

Nothing denotes a "brilliant" commenter better than applying the most inane, cliched descriptors to suit their preconceived narrative.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Watch out, bruh, narrative multiplicity is woke AF.

I am certain that I have described your cliche and inane views accurately.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Are you training for conclusion -leaping? I don't think that's an Olympic event yet , , ,

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Witty remarks are not your thing.

Perhaps “musing” is your metier.

Expand full comment
Debbie Mitchell's avatar

Where did you see those inferences? Or did you reply to the wrong comment?

I interpret what I read from my own lens, but I could not reach far enough out of my box to understand your view.

Expand full comment
Admiral Glorp Golp's avatar

Shut up chat gpt

Expand full comment
Bonnie Blodgett's avatar

You honestly thinking chat gbt is capable of this level of wit? I'm with you, Curling Iron!

Expand full comment
Admiral Glorp Golp's avatar

Curling iron has two accounts I guess. Wit I see none. Or a fed. But regardless bots can be living humans too it is not restricted to machines. So shut chat gpt and other chat gpt.

Expand full comment
Selenti's avatar

It's somewhat redundant to say that though, considering the Republican party has been taken over by populists and the Democrats are now the party of the rich. It was a good point to make 10-15 years ago, but now the battlelines have been drawn up. Sure, there is still work to do to purge the GOP of establishment goons, but it's not like the parties are evenly divided in that sense, the vast majority are either Democrats, or "Republicans" and "Conservatives" who are only called that in the press, have either been exiled or willingly left their party and repudiated all the nasty peasants.

Expand full comment
Michael Kelly's avatar

I'm with you on the globalists ... I keep telling people there's this shadowy organization called the United Nations that is behind most of the globalization efforts. And is joined by a sister organization called the World Economic Forum. Together they spout all manner of frightening people herding measures, right out of Soilent Green.

Alas, people don't believe their own eyes anymore.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

The Blob awaits us all

Expand full comment
ResistWeMuch's avatar

the Bill of Rights neglected to include a right of self governance which would prohibit cross state (think Kalifornia) and cross country oppression. globalism ignores the natural human rights of self governance.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

And here we are “globalists versus nationalists.”

You’re such a free thinking freedom kinda guy.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 19
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Lol!!

Expand full comment
NothingButNet's avatar

👍 Matt is a true liberal - gathering all the facts, analyzing them through an unbiased lens and speaking truth to power, regardless of who that power represents. Keep up the good the great work, Matt!

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

There is no such thing as an unbiased lense. Whenever someone claims to be without bias then I know for certain they speak for the ruling class.

Taibbi is not unbiased. He doesn’t pretend to be unbiased either. And that’s why, though I find his current trajectory somewhere between asinine and abhorrent, he isn’t lying to me.

Maybe he lies to himself - that’s his problem. But he isn’t bullshitting us - even when he sucks.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Then why are you reading? Or bothering to comment?

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

You Racket commenters really are religious about Taibbi.

How dare anyone utter a discouraging word about Taibbi’s blog!

I like having a front seat to Taibbi’s changes over the past few years. It’s fascinating to observe an otherwise intelligent person become a standard issue American idiot.

The shit he writes about now is breathtaking in its myopia.

Guess that’s what happens when you’re your own editor.

He has succumbed to the contemporary cultural and political anxieties of the moment as he rails against “gender ideology,” “lockdowns,” etc. He is a voice in the current organized right wing politics. He is a voice that helps the organized political groups mainstream far right discourses and synthesize nationalism with a radical form of libertarianism.

The pandemic lockdowns served as the perfect space to accomplish this synthesis. While pandemic restrictions halted immigration the contention over the border pivoted to restricting the movement of nefarious Others to liberating “the people” from their own internal constraints.

Now we have all these far right social media influencers, shit like Racket, all these self-employed small business owners, hucksters of alt medicine and wellness products, anti lockdown protesters.

So here we are. The mainstreaming of fringe lunacy like Malthusian population controls to the “Great Replacement…” these are currently the language of everyday life.

Critiques of pandemic lockdowns have turned to warnings about a dystopian future of climate lockdowns.

Taibbi can not get away from these binaries: truth and lies, nationalists and globalists, freedom fighters and totalitarians (his absolute fave cause he’s the hero!) the suburbs and the city, workaday motorists and climate protestors.

Anyway…sure this is all lost on you idiots because it isn’t rephrasing Taibbi.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

You really are deranged. Since you've absolutely nothing useful, intelligent, or amusing to say, why don't you simply talk to yourself in a mirror, and spare the rest of us your useless, senseless drivel. Are you 4?

Your hatred of small business owners would indicate you are very unAmerican. If you are unAmerican, or not American at all, just STFU if you've nothing useful to add to the conversation.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Some people just like to hear themselves talk. Having a point is irrelevant. Actually, I can picture little CI rehearsing this rant in front of a mirror

Expand full comment
DaveL's avatar

I believe he is talking into a mirror. Good command of the language, but no specific examples of where Taibbi has gone wrong.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Me and the other Antifa super soldiers will be executing small business owners on Thanksgiving Day in towns and cities all over this vile country.

BLM Marxist cadre will also go door to door emptying white American households of all turkeys, stuffing and green bean casserole. Cadre will redistribute this to undocumented migrants while we all enjoy a meal and watch Futbol.

Expand full comment
NothingButNet's avatar

Damn, someone must have cracked your skull with a curling iron. You’re spouting the intolerance and hate that has become representative of the left over the past 20-30 years. Get help, buddy.

Expand full comment
ruck95's avatar

Gee, you don't think too highly of yourself, do you?

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Do you really subscribe to John McWhorter’s substack?

I guess somebody has to?

Expand full comment
Savi_heretic33's avatar

Religious? No, I don't believe in Matt as my savior, he's just a good journalist. It's pretty basic. He's bucked the system and left the plantation. His independence has freed him from the shackles of corporate media, allowing him to actually report the truth. Something you don't get much of these days.Matt's a trail blazer. He's harnessed the new media, and for this reason I'm informed. Democracy can't flourish without an informed public.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Sure. That’s it. We need an informed public.

Depends on the information. Doesn’t help when this so called informed public repeats Exxon talking points about a climate hoax.

Expand full comment
Lightwing's avatar

Hyperbolic much? I can feel your spittle, sir.

Matt is yanking TPTB's chain and letting them know that there are people out there who see what they are doing. He has always done this. Don't you remember the "vampire squid?" And he's doing it in spite of being harrassed and threatened and villified. He's an old school liberal (like me) who's pissed off at the current antics of the left and who is trying to expose how they are using corrupt practices to control the media narrative in this country.

I don't see anything that you are asserting in his reporting. He is definitely NOT right wing. He may be in alignment with their outrage but any American of no matter what political stripe should be outraged right now. TPTB are out of control and not serving ordinary Americans at all. They are treating this country like their own personal playground. This has been ramping up for a long time as the elites bend power and policy toward their interests and leave the little guy in the dust. It's just reached a head at present. It is a boil waiting to burst.

Expand full comment
Tolerance Is Lazy's avatar

So, you put gender ideology in parentheses. Sort of makes me want to put “you” in parentheses because you sound as informed as a ChatGPT bot.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Do you know what parentheses are?

Expand full comment
Wm. S. Loder's avatar

What a bunch of esoteric bullshit.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

“Esoteric” is how I also describe things I am unwilling to comprehend. Especially if such esoterica challenges my point of view.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Or in case you don’t like reading or learning anything that isn’t Taibbi or some other pod blog idiot:

Taibbi isn’t grifting, he isn’t working for some conglomerate with an interest in selling bombs (NBC.)

I do not like most of what he writes. I also don’t like Longfellow but I like poetry so I read him.

Taibbi is an important voice no matter how boring, insipid and myopic he is.

I care about the matters of the day and the place where I live. And Taibbi, as loathsome as I find him, is part of that.

Expand full comment
Nick's avatar

Criticise if you must, but do so with some measure of skill or accuracy, otherwise it comes off as bluster and scattershot anger about various unrelated things.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Hey, I’m just trying to fit into the neighborhood.

Expand full comment
Admiral Glorp Golp's avatar

Fed

Expand full comment
Starry Gordon's avatar

Actually I'd like to see a critique — "opposition is true friendship" — but I seldom see one. Namecalling doesn't count.

Expand full comment
Kendall Frazier's avatar

In case anyone was wondering where all that Kamala donation money was going it is to fund shithead disinformation asshole whores like this guy.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

She could pay a lot better. The Chinese Communist Party pays way better.

Hamas doesn’t pay at all. But their situation is less stable.

Expand full comment
RAO's avatar

Sucks? How so?

Expand full comment
Keith Jajko's avatar

What a worthless dolt. Moving on.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I know. Even the smallest nudge against your precious Taibbi and his “unbiased” writing has you calling me names.

Expand full comment
James Martucci's avatar

I’m sorry we “idiots” and “morons” have called you names. People who use words like that in comments should be ashamed of themselves.

Jim

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I am ashamed.

Jimmy, thank you for helping me.

I’ve been a worthless dolt. I was a fool to disagree with the fearless fighters against woke Dem totalitarianism.

For once I was blind and now I see.

Expand full comment
Gogs's avatar

You know for certain...dangerous words. For you, that is. You may noticed - or turned a blind eye - that no one has liked any of your pontifications so far.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I’m pretty bummed a bunch of right wing morons don’t give me likes.

Expand full comment
Robert Campbell's avatar

I think your comment is biased.

Expand full comment
DaveL's avatar

Apparently feldspar has been replaced.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I am pleasantly surprised to find that some of you Matt Fans still have a sense of humor.

Expand full comment
Robert Campbell's avatar

We do indeed; but we are laughing AT you, not WITH you. You’re not as clever and amusing as you think.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I am more clever and amusing than you.

Expand full comment
Victor Toso's avatar

We have a local hair stylist who might grant you more lucidity for your vacuous critiques. Her shop name: Curl Up and Dye. Go girl!

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Grant me more lucidity for my vacuous critiques…

When I fail to understand something I also call it dumb and vacuous.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Where do you think his trajectory is headed? What parts are abhorrent or asinine?

Expand full comment
TWC's avatar

Time to stop calling them Democrats.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Demokrats

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Like Amerikkka? Careful, buddy, your Racket friends toe a narrow line.

Expand full comment
Susie's avatar

New name: Blue Team

Expand full comment
Nowhere Man's avatar

"Blue MAGA" is my preferred term for the base.

For the actual members of the party who hold office, "Authoritarian" will do, or "NeoCon" if in reference to foreign policy.

Expand full comment
Cesare di Monte Calvi's avatar

I've been calling their criminal 'D' organization a Despicable one (not that Repulsive is any better).

Expand full comment
Thomas Herring's avatar

Indeed.

Expand full comment
Secret Squirrel's avatar

What should we call them? Democrats have lied about their intentions since I’ve been paying attention. Circa 2001. Lying is the only way they get elected.

Expand full comment
Alice Ball's avatar

Marxists

Expand full comment
Meredith Hobbs's avatar

Dems are now right-wing warmongers and hard-core enablers of capitalists. Calling them Marxists indicates that you have no idea what is going on. Ludicrous and dumb.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Neo Marxists. They have been busy harnessing a cultural intersectional coalition of the aggrieved ( proletariat ) into a voting block/ protesters/ institutional change makers and cultural enforcers. While also using capitalism to exploit its weaknesses to ultimately destroy the West. The Democratic Party is just the vehicle being used.Corporate media , government bureaucrats, teachers , professors, politicians are just playing follow the leader all in the name of “progress” until the progress comes for them too. This is what the long march through the institutions looks like.

Expand full comment
Reelin’ In The Fears's avatar

Neo-Marxists. It has a more sinister ring to it

Expand full comment
Rob Roy's avatar

Anyone who calls today's Democrats "Marxists" or "Communists" doesn't know the meaning of these words. One thing about Matt, he does his job with total honesty, always.

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

It's hard to ascribe meaning to words in a post-truth world; but it's still possible to see the Marxist-like tactics being used by the Establishment, especially in terms of sowing cultural division at the most fundamental levels. It's also quite possible to see that the WEF/UN agenda to replace Western democracy and the nation-state is deeply inspired by the Chinese Communist Party. Global establishment political puppets like Trudeau, Macron and even Mitt Romney have waxed poetic about how good "they" have it in China. It might not be your grandfather's idea of communism but it's what is presently in play. Call it what you will.

Expand full comment
Nowhere Man's avatar

>> sowing cultural division at the most fundamental levels

Both parties are equally guilty of this.

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

I didn't mention a party or parties, but I see the post I responded to did. You're right, of course. The Republican Party is still an establishment party. They pay a lot of lip service to placate the Trump movement and remain relevant, but when push comes to shove they tow the establishment line on the economy, foreign policy, centralization of power. The only things that matter to the elites.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

yeah fascism NEVER does this

right?

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

What exactly is “cultural division?”

Is that like how you don’t like Thai food?

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Sorry but the past 16 years it’s been all one party doing the cultural enforcing. For a few years in the 90’s the Republicans had the whip hand

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

“Marxist like tactics”

Ok. Whatever that means.

It seems that you have created a figure, “the Marxist,” a figure that is authoritarian, devious, nefarious…Typically this is what one does when one needs to disavow this part of themselves.

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

I wasn't referring to the economic policies of Marx. Some, it seems, might have a more romantic view of the Russian Revolution than others.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

How is that MARXIST? no, really

please explain

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Neo Marxist.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

To quote Matt Walsh, “what is a Marxist?”

Expand full comment
DaveL's avatar

You actually said something intelligent!

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

And your entire reason for saying that is that I mentioned Matt Walsh, self-declared fascist.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

you wouldn't know a 'marxist' if they bit you on the ass

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

At least the nefarious Other (sorry, Marxist) can admit being into butt stuff. I think the fellas in this neighborhood would have trouble admitting it.

Demanding intellectual honesty or even understanding from these folks is a fool’s errand. They clearly have no idea what Marxism is.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

yeah Matt's comment sections are a wasteland of Covid brain damage...

which is ongoing~

Expand full comment
Liz's avatar

Statist and authoritarians or even Uniparty. So many choices.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Uniparty has a good ring to it

Expand full comment
Greg Lang's avatar

NeoSoviets would be accurate

Expand full comment
TWC's avatar

Call them Liars then.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 19
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Yeah. We get it. So funny. Thanks.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 19
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Janine's avatar

How could you not tell? The acid drip of self-loathing is a tip off

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I like this. Gay men are self-loathing.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Yes, I am Gay. Just ask your Dad about it after he finishes swallowing my cum.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 19
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Richard Vos's avatar

Michael Shellenberger summed up this evolving totalitarianism in the West quite well in an article published today on his Substack PUBLIC. Essentially - we're witnessing the desperate attempt of narcissistic and psychopathic people who manage the ruling institutions of government, business, media, etc to hold onto power by whatever means possible.

https://www.public.news/p/these-four-things-are-behind-the?utm_campaign=email-post&r=ry8oy&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Ah, yes. Totalitarians against freedom fighters.

Doesn’t sound at all like the past 100 years of American political discourse: deranged and nefarious Others taking over!

When will you tire of this?

Expand full comment
Nowhere Man's avatar

Yes but he's OUR nuisance.

Expand full comment
Shooter 6's avatar

Not only that, he wrote for Rolling Stone! It's the touchstone for uncannily accurate and witty political reporting since the gonzo days of Doc Thompson. Matt Taibbi has totally confused The Boys On The Bus.

Expand full comment
Alice Ball's avatar

Back in the day it was. Trash now.

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

09/18/24: Exactly the same as The New Yorker magazine (suggested title change to "Tranny Teen Vogue"), which now slavishly does the bidding of the soon-to-be deposed Obama Administration (3rd Term, with Biden as a Yeltsin-puppet figurehead). Why isn't their editor, David Remnick, a member of the rabies-saturated cast on ABC's "The View"?

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

09/19/24: 34 MILLION views! And well worth your time:

https://x.com/jeremykauffman/status/1835782658091102608

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

09/18/24: Perfectly stated. Now, really. Did we expect anything else from the likes of Antony Blinken, U.S. Secretary of State [Security & Ideological Coercion], whose father was Robert Maxwell's lawyer?

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Ole Blinkey

Expand full comment
Miep's avatar

WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

It’s so amusing. You like most of the idiots on here think you sound so smart, courageous, rebellious, not mainstream…but you sound exactly like eachother, exactly like Taibbi and exactly like most of the other people in this country.

It’s hilarious that none of you get that you all are mainstream.

Expand full comment
Patrick's avatar

How do describe yourself? Indulge 'us'.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I am your worst nightmare. I am everything you hate and fear.

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

Real journalists like yourself, Matt, are the only people keeping the Republic alive. Keep up the good fight.

Expand full comment
gortroe's avatar

Thanks to Matt and to all who contribute here. Gives me the talking points I need when pressing my case.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

With whom are you speaking? What case are you pressing?

Why can’t you just have a date with a nice person? Why must you “press your case?”

Are we Americans this anxious and fucked up that we can’t have social

Interactions that don’t devolve into some stupid blather about the totalitarians and blah blah.

Me and my friends we got all kinds of different ideas. Yet we have a good time loving eachother. Nobody is pressing a case.

Me and my co workers, a lot of them are as crazy as you fuckers, but we come together to fight the boss.

Try making friends with people.

Not everything is fight about Trump or whatever.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Ironic post of the year. Congrats!

Expand full comment
Stunned Gen Xer's avatar

So this troll (curling iron) subscribes to Racket to scribble dumbass, nonsensical comments that don’t even sound like a person wrote them. It unnerves me in a way. Who pays for these troll armies to write the above nonsense. I’ve seen pix of the troll armies, but who funds them?

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Yes. The joint Chinese Communist Party and Supreme Revolutionary Council of Iran Troll Army is coming after Racket commenters.

We can no longer allow these freedom fighters to challenge our world domination of the global child sex trade.

Expand full comment
Stunned Gen Xer's avatar

Et tu Hair Dryer?

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

CHAT-GPS?

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Probably hard for you to fathom a social life.

Just stop showing people who care about you all those bizarre videos about 9/11 and trans kids playing sports.

It’s easier to make friends when you aren’t, well, like you.

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

Projecting much?

Expand full comment
Admiral Glorp Golp's avatar

Oh my incoherent rambling!

Expand full comment
Megan Baker's avatar

I’d suggest that people who protest the genocide in Gaza and against our shockingly bad and stupid government are doing just as much to keep the republic alive. We’re meant to submit ourselves to domination by our corporate/governmental overlords and their despicable exploits abroad, but those of us in the resistance aren’t having it. Kudos to us all!

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

But for the brave journalists- an enormous number killed in Gaza- we'd remain blissfully ignorant.

You can't solve a problem you don't even know exists. Thus the State's censorship push across the globe.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Sometimes you crazy right wingers are confusing. Here you are admitting the Zionists kill journalists.

And then later it’s immigrants eating the ducks from the pond or some shit.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

pssst, ci

not everyone here is a 'right winger' but you're right, there's a lot here

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

Long past time to get beyond the fake D/R, Left/Right manufactured divide. It's a tool of the oligarch class to control us.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Yes, the billionaire real estate mogul will fight for us!

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

He's less likely to fight against us than the neoliberal's hand puppet Kamla.

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

Amen!

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

The “republic” is dead. Been dead a long time. Started out shit and it’s even worse now.

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

No, the psy-op controlled public can still right the ship. Just need to end the mass formation psychosis. If resistance was futile the lies and propaganda would be unnecessary.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

You do understand that this is specious reasoning. You are drawing your premise from your conclusion. Why do so many on the right do this? Is it part of maintaining the totalitarian vs freedom fighter binary?

Whatever. Carry on you crazy nut jobs.

Expand full comment
Admiral Glorp Golp's avatar

Shut up bot

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Rue the day right wingers learned the term “psy op.” Now everything is psy-op.

Expand full comment
Drewbacca's avatar

The leftist arrogance is strong with this one!

Expand full comment
New Humanity's avatar

Using psy-op : Overused maybe. But it’s such a useful word to describe the created matrix & MK ultra brainwashing !

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Tell me more

Expand full comment
John Sirko's avatar

Did not start as shit, sorry, but perfection was not on the table at the time, if so we'd never have survived under the Articles of Confederation. In 1787 we had the best government on Earth. 👍. My view is they did not account for the formation of corporate political parties and the extreme influence a union of one interest can exert. Overwhelms the whole of the body politic and true representative government.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

It started with owning human beings is ok. Then as now the most powerful and wealthy elements of society rule.

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

Slavery was the norm of the human condition until 19th century Christians fought wars to stamp it out. It was a disease inherited from our colonial masters, bloodily purged at the cost of over 600,000 American lives.

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

I think the biggest defect in the Constitution is that the population ratio to Congress was never set, just the 35k minimum established, left the actual size of Congress to mere legislative fiat. The House's size has been frozen since the 1920 census, population has nearly trippled and woman got the vote so in effect we have 1/6th the representation today. Bottles up popular will.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

That’s the biggest flaw? That’s not even the biggest flaw concerning apportionment.

Expand full comment
Bill Jarett's avatar

In your opinion.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Compared to what?

Expand full comment
Drewbacca's avatar

Then move out

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

God Bless Americans. Criticize the country I was born in and my fellow citizen tells me to leave.

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

I think your time in Russia has uniquely prepared you for this moment. Keep reporting the uncomfortable truths, Matt. The country needs you.

Expand full comment
Debibliovore Robinson's avatar

If I could, I would like this comment eleventy billion times.

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

me too!!!!

Expand full comment
Donna's avatar

Amen!

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Uncomfortable truths. Not condemnable lies.

Simple bullshit is always the best.

I can feel the fascist dystopia in my toes.

Expand full comment
Jen Garner's avatar

Matt, I can’t imagine the strain you and your family are under. Your integrity, dedication to truth, and love of your professional calling shine in every piece. In tough moments, I hope you can draw strength and encouragement from the knowledge that there are thousands of readers like me cheering you on, praying for you, and ever grateful for the sacrifices you make to do your job well. You terrify all the right people.

Expand full comment
Julinthecrown's avatar

Walking in lockstep with you, Jen.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

I think you meant goose-step. Its ok. You can say it, you’re among friends.

Expand full comment
Debibliovore Robinson's avatar

❤️

Expand full comment
Larry Hause's avatar

Very well said. I was going to post something similar but you're post was so spot on! Praying for you Matt.

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

me too!!

Expand full comment
Jessica's avatar

Yes!!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 19
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

The truth? What do you know about the truth?

Expand full comment
JB's avatar

You’re probably doing something right if they’re trying to smear you, Matt.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

That’s very dumb. It lacks all rationality.

Do you mean to say that those who smear are themselves the arbiters?

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

From your comments it would seem you are not someone with so much as a passing acquaintance with rationality. Certainly not intellect on even a level of mediocrity, either.

Expand full comment
Keith Jajko's avatar

Worthless dolt is the term that keeps surfacing when I see it's comments.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

It’s. A contraction meaning “it is.”

I believe you were attempting to refer to me using the indefinite pronoun, It. For clarity it’s important to capitalize the “I”

Even though the IED broke your brain, I still think your spear carrying for the Empire was valuable and brave.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

It's you who's spear-carrying for the Empire, not Mr. Jajko. You obviously hate those who can think.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

If you mean yourself by “those who can think” take heart, I don’t hate you.

Jajko did, according to his bio he was in the military in Iraq 2003-2005.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Lol !

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Nah. Just musings. You get it.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

No, I do not get it. I am far too intelligent to "get" idiocy at your level.

Expand full comment
Pbr's avatar

It’s a troll,

Expand full comment
John Linder's avatar

There is a lot at stake in this election. Trump, I hope, has learned his lesson. His declining CIA briefings because he knows that they will brief him on some obtuse issue and then leak the info the media has taught him a lot. If he wins a 70-year old system of control could collapse. Desperate people do desperate things. Pray for him to survive the next 48 days.

Expand full comment
KHP's avatar
Sep 19Edited

It's not just the next 48 days, if he wins the election it's from then until the end of his term as well.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Trump has already been president for 4 years. The whole world saw that he was powerless for all 4 yrs. No one in the Beltway has the slightest fear of him. The Pentagon ignored him. Yet you "hope" he'll be different. Even more fantastic, though he never laid a glove on the Deep State, and has openly said it takes 5-15 yrs to remove one bureaucrat, you suggest he could overthrow the 70 year post WWII order. Angelo Codevilla must be laughing in his grave to hear that one. Trump was elected in 2016 for 2 reasons: #1 he unconditionally promised a wall on day one. #2, he promised detente w. Russia. He delivered neither, in fact delivered the opposite, putting Jared in charge of "the border." In August 2017 congress removed all Russia matters from Don. Medvedev commented at the time how humiliating this was for Don. The whole world knew his 2016 election had been nullified, that he was powerless. Yet he sat there wasting 4 yrs of our time and became a more vicious neocon than McCain. In July 2017 he went on tv and announced he changed his mind about Mideast wars, now thinks they're necessary. This doesn't even get into his shutting down the country in 2020 and throwing tens of millions out of work. Trump doesn't deserve prayers. He deserves to be in jail. If you're afraid that poor, poor Don can't stand up to the Deep State, then he's not the man for the job.

Expand full comment
Patrick's avatar

It’s time for your meds, Karen err Susan

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Patrick, what in particular do you disagree with?

Expand full comment
Julinthecrown's avatar

Sorry, Patrick, stepping in for a moment. Susan, I don't have enough good years left to explain the myriad of things that can be disagreed with in your post. Suffice it to say that your thinking is provincial.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

But you’re spending your remaining good years here? You need a friend. Or a lover.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Jul, could you just name the top one or two items in my comment that you disagreed with? I'm very curious. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Wm. S. Loder's avatar

The alternative is unthinkable.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Got to vehemently disagree on about every point you make. Seems like YOU are the one who fears he can’t stand up to the deep state

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Glitter, could you please say the top one or two items that you vehemently disagreed with the most? Thanks.

Expand full comment
Julinthecrown's avatar

So that's a 'no' for a vote for Trump?

Expand full comment
Keith Jajko's avatar

Someone seriously is not well and needs a whole team of psychiatrists to treat that severe, *severe* case of TDS.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

What in particular in my comment are you referencing?

Expand full comment
gortroe's avatar

Perhaps you might move things along, Susan, if you referenced your claims.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

References: One, Beltway has no fear of Trump: 9/23/20, “Revolution 2020,” Angelo Codevilla, American Mind

“Let there be no doubt: the ruling class’s focus on Donald Trump has been incidental. America’s potentates do not fear one pudgy orange-haired septuagenarian. They fear the millions of Americans whom they loathe, who voted for Trump, who gave his party control of House and Senate, and who will surely vote for folks these potentates really should fear….

Our revolution is by the ruling class–a revolution from above. Crushing obstacles to its growing oligarchic rule is the proximate purpose.…

Affirmation of one’s own superiority by punishing inferiors is an addictive pleasure. It requires ever stronger, purer doses of infliction, and is inherently beyond satisfaction.

In short…the ruling class’s intensifying efforts to oppress those they imagine to be their inferiors is not reversible…"

......................................

Two: July 2017, announced changed mind on Mideast wars:

July 6, 2021, “What Is Trump To Us?" Angelo Codevilla, American Greatness: “He let himself be persuaded by his first secretaries of state and defense, and his second national security advisor, to give a nationally televised speech in July 2017 effectively thanking them for showing him that he—and his voters—had been wrong in opposing the ongoing war in the Middle East."

..................................

Three: August 2017-Congress removed Russia matters from Trump, neutered him re: Russia matters: 8/6/2017, “Playing Politics with the World’s Future,” Alastair Crooke, Consortium News

"“Finally…the U.S. Congress has produced a piece of legislation, [“The Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act,” also known as “The Russia Sanctions Review Act of 2017″]. And it passed with quasi-unanimous, bi-partisan support. [98-2 in Senate, 419-3 in the House]." Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev commented: "Any hope of improving our relations with the new U.S. administration is over....The Trump administration demonstrated it is utterly powerless, and in the most humiliating manner, transferred executive powers to Congress.…The American establishment completely outplayed Trump.”…

.............................................

Four: Pentagon ignored Trump for 4 years

8/31/2020, "PATRICK LAWRENCE: Voting in a De-Facto Military State," Consortium News

"Foreign policy took up several important planks in Trump’s platform, readers may recall. He campaigned promising to reduce the military’s presence abroad, end our wars of adventure, ease NATO into the history books, and make a constructive relationship with Russia out of the unnecessary hostilities Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, his secretary of state, left behind. These positions won him votes....Unsurprisingly, we have seen virtually no progress toward Trump’s objectives since he took office in January 2017. The Pentagon and the national security apparatus have ignored, circumvented, or otherwise subverted his orders to withdraw troops from foreign theaters, notably Syria and now Germany. Relations with Russia have dramatically worsened. NATO still pretends it has a function in the post–Soviet era."

...........................................

Five: Trump made himself a pushover:

8/31/2020, "PATRICK LAWRENCE: Voting in a De-Facto Military State," Consortium News

"In spring 2017, when the military contradicted his early efforts to deescalate in Syria, Trump entered his “my generals, my military” phase, saying he granted the Pentagon “total authorization” to act as it saw fit.

With after-the-fact capitulations such as this, Trump has made himself a pushover for the hawks and Deep Staters who surround him."

................................................

Six: 11/26/2019, "Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law, has been put in charge of expediting the building of a wall [fence] on the US-Mexico border."...

[No "wall" was allowed. GOP congress forbade wall. If any barrier, only fencing was allowed].

It is another task in Kushner's broad portfolio of White House responsibilities, which already includes securing peace in the Middle East and reforming the criminal-justice system."...https://www.businessinsider.com/jared-kushner-made-responsible-for-border-wall-report-2019-11

..................................................

Seven: 2/9/2021, “Tal Bachman: A Quick Post-Mortem,“ The Bachman Beat, via Steynonline

"Trump began by claiming he was only going to hire “the best people”. In the end, it was Trump himself who concluded he only hired the worst people....

It [His administration] should have pushed for the abolition of computerized vote-counting machines altogether, since their vulnerability to error has been amply documented for decades....

Add to all this Trump's...odd passivity underneath all the vituperative language....

I suggest it is time for conservatives to fully accept the fact that Trump failed at the Power Game."...https://www.steynonline.com/11046/tal-bachman-a-quick-post-mortem

.............................................................

Eight: July 6, 2021, “What Is Trump To Us?" Angelo Codevilla, American Greatness

"By the time he [Trump] left office, Washington was laughing at him—and was hurting his voters....

Again and again, Trump signed mammoth spending bills that contained the Democratic Party’s wish lists, having promised not to, vowing never to do it again, and then doing it again.

By creating trillions of dollars in debt, which the Federal Reserve monetizes and channels through financial institutions, Trump was the sine qua non of the financialization that has transferred wealth from Main Street—which voted for Trump—to Wall Street, which is part and parcel of the ruling class. Trump also left untouched the tax code’s “carried interest” provision that is the source of much of the financial sector’s unearned wealth.

As Google, Facebook, and Twitter increasingly squeezed conservative content to the cyberworld’s sidelines, Trump railed against Section 230 of the Communications Act that lets them do it with impunity, but did nothing that would stop them, or subject them to lawsuits....

Trump knew that FBI Director James Comey, his chief subordinates, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper had broken the law by surveilling his campaign. Nevertheless, he praised them and their agencies, kept them in office, did not refer them for prosecution, and kept secret the documents associated with their illegalities.

Trump let himself be stampeded into firing General Michael Flynn on wholly specious grounds—the only high profile national security official who had supported him and who stood in the way of the intelligence agencies’ plans against him—and stood by as the ruling class ruined Flynn’s life.

Days after the inauguration, he suffered the CIA’s removal of clearances from one of his appointees because he was a critic of the agency. Any president worthy of his office would have fired the entire chain of officials who had made that decision. Instead, he appointed to these agencies people loyal to those officials and hostile to himself, notably CIA’s Gina Haspel, who likely committed a crime spying on his candidacy.

This is an especially crucial point about the intelligence agencies, the enmity of which there was never any doubt: He criticized officials over whom he had absolute power, but left them in office. Even without considering that the majority of Trump appointees were hostile to him and his constituents, the fact that he filled scarcely more than a quarter of executive positions certifies that

there hardly ever was a Trump Administration."...

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Citation: Trump says it takes 5-15 years to fire a bureaucrat. 3 stages, 5 yrs per stage. He says congress should pass new law making it easier to fire bureaucrats. 2022, CPAC, reported by Breitbart, 8/6/2022, "Donald Trump: Next President Must ‘Remove Rogue Bureaucrats and Root out the Deep State’,"

"Trump complained that the current process to remove a federal bureaucrat from their post is a lengthy process that takes an average of five years:

"Our current appeals process to remove these bureaucrats, people that can really be bad, they can even be thieves. You can catch them stealing large sums of money. You have to go through a three stage appeals process, which takes on average five years per stage. 15 years you’ll be gone; you’ll be out of office by then.""...https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/06/donald-trump-next-president-must-remove-rogue-bureaucrats-and-root-out-the-deep-state/

Expand full comment
Robin Budzi's avatar

Quite the revisionist take on history. Hopefully, you will make it to November because that is a long time to keep telling lies. And the nose keeps on going. Probably worn your clan out by now with your nonsense.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Oh no, Robin. The grandchildren don’t want to hear you ramble on about the climate hoax?

Just hang out with them and leave your dumb politics aside. They miss you.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Robin, what do you consider "lies?"

Expand full comment
Robin Budzi's avatar

Everything you wrote.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

"Everything" was lies? Could you just tell me the top one or two things that were the biggest "lies?" Thanks.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

None of these morons are familiar with the Epimenides Paradox so don’t worry about it.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Written like a good little fan of everything wrong with this nation. Sounds like you are one of the many who despise everything the US once stood for, and it's pesky recognition of the inherent rights of human beings.

Go and vote against them, as I am sure you will.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

Ellen, I don't understand your reply. Could you please give me one or two examples of your objections to my citations? Thanks.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Don’t hold your breath. All Ellen’s got is musings.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

The US has never stood for the inherent rights of human beings. The US institutionalized owning human beings as property.

Perhaps you can make some argument for the US making progress towards some allegedly expressed ideal.

But I imagine such nuance is lost on you.

Love it or leave it, right?

Susan Mullen, in a fool’s errand it seems, laid out very clearly citations for all the assertions they made. And here all you Racket morons ignore it and call Mullen names.

None of you idiots care at all about anything outside of your narrow scope, what with you exclusive access to The Truth.

I’m sorry Mullen took all of you seriously. You are all the worst parts of this country: violent and stupid, bloodthirsty cowards braying for war.

Expand full comment
JanetS's avatar

Trump never tried to censor me or anyone else. Nor did he fire those who would not take the jab. That makes him safer than the alternative who are quickly turning in to authoritarians and Facists.

Expand full comment
Keith Jajko's avatar

#word

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

What does he belong in jail for? Being an inexperienced asshole isn’t illegal ……yet.

Expand full comment
justamom's avatar

You sound like Matt Mullen who comments at The Free Press. Not a compliment.

Expand full comment
Janine's avatar

No, not neocon. Trump targeted ISIS, and used detente policies to focus on doing so, the same as we allied with Russia to fight Nazis in WW2. The neocons have loved to use Islamist extremist militants everywhere they can. Under Biden, ISIS has made a comeback, esp thanks to our NATO ally Erdogan of Turkey and his neo-Ottoman regime. Now they're sending their own Islamist militants from Syria all over the place, to Africa, to Nagorno Karabagh, etc. Not the same policy as neocons. It backfired on them in Gaza, bigtime

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

You say Trump isn't a neocon. In 2016 he was elected by promising to reduce US foreign military aggression and favoring normalization of relations w. Russia. 12 wks after he was inaugurated he bombed Syria for no reason except some fake photos of "children" taken by US-backed jihadists in Idlib. He chose the occasion to "warn" Russia not to help Syria because US has very fast missiles to attack again. WaPo patted Don on the head. Idlib of course is the world's largest Al Qaeda safe haven as Brett McGurk stated in 2017....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahhWjHxOhXo....In 2017 alone Trump dropped 60,000 bombs, avg. of 179 per day, more even than Obama....https://www.afcent.af.mil/Portals/82/November%202021%20Airpower%20Summary_FINAL.pdf...You say Don "targeted" ISIS but you don't say what he did beyond "targeting" it. You say he used "detente" policies to focus on "targeting" ISIS. Since "targeting" ISIS means nothing, I don't understand why "detente" policies would be used. Then you say Don's so-called "targeting" of ISIS was the same as US "allied with Russia to fight Nazis in WWII." First, US was never under Nazi occupation as was the Soviet Union. Leningrad was occupied for 900 days causing immense suffering, starvation, and death. The US, protected by vast oceans, was never under foreign occupation. To this day, US has never endured such suffering. 25 million citizens of the Soviet Union died saving Europe from Nazi takeover. Shortly after Soviets entered Berlin in April 1945, Hitler took his cyanide pill. It was nice that US supplied some weapons--as US says to this day, "their blood, our bullets." I don't consider "blood for bullets" an "alliance" to brag about, though the UK would likely agree it wouldn't have survived WWII had it not received help from US taxpayers. As to "ISIS," you're misinformed. The US and Russia were on opposite sides. US efforts in Syria were to overthrow the government of Pres. Assad, meaning criminal, uninvited, and inhumane. US efforts against ISIS were minimal since ISIS had same goal as US, ie to remove Assad. As jihadist groups surrounded Damascus in 2015, at the last minute Assad called his friend, the Russian Federation, and asked for help. Mr. Putin received approval from his government to provide air power to save Syria which he did within a few months. ISIS represents only a small number of the many jihadists in Syria and elsewhere, it's mainly used as a propaganda tool against US taxpayers. Trump was even a human shield for the Al Qaeda controlled Idlib province in Syria, telling Assad and Russia not to try and rescue citizens trapped there by jihadist groups. https://www.france24.com/en/20180904-trump-warns-assad-syria-russia-iran-against-idlib-attack...Syria is a sovereign nation and has every responsibility and right to rescue its own citizens from terrorist enclaves. It's very lucky to have a humane neighbor like Russia willing to help. It was no business of Don or the US taxpayer. The remainder of your reply deals with other matters which I'd be happy to address at another time since this reply is already quite lengthy.

Expand full comment
Janine's avatar

Trump's public stand on ending the Ukraine war alone is enough to make it clear he's not with the neocons, and nobody should have to explain that to a person who claims to be informed about present day politics/ policy strategy

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Obama refused to arm Ukraine so as to not make the US backed 2014 coup into something even worse.

Trump resumed weapons sales to Ukraine well before Russia invading. He did this over the objections of Russia. (Calm down Racket-brained, I never believed the POTUS was a Russian agent or peed in an offensive way on video.)

Trump’s actions are not opposing a war. That is setting one up.

Of course one of the only sensible things anyone said was from Trump when he explained that he didn’t want Ukraine or Russia to win, he wanted the war to stop. And he would speak with both parties and figure out an agreement they could live with.

Again, most sensible thing from anyone so far. And I entirely agree with that approach.

But then he did arm Ukraine over Russian objections so I’m not so sure he cares to stop that conflict.

Expand full comment
Janine's avatar

Under Obama John Brennan spent $1 billion arming IS & AQ fighters to be the Free Syrian Army to overthrow Assad. Trump refused to renew the program. The autonomous northern region became a place of cooperation in order to fight ISIL, involving France, US and others. This was not consistent with neocon policy. In terms of singular bombing raids after the instigations massively played up in the press, these were nothing compared to regime change war. Unfortunately yes active military support was withdrawm but the situation reverted and deteriorated under Biden with Turkey let loose to expand support for various jihadist mercenary groups and its own hostile activities

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

no shit

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

I doubt Trump has learned anything.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Are you familiar with the term “dick-riding?”

Expand full comment
Julinthecrown's avatar

I am.

Expand full comment
badnabor's avatar

"Our goons aren’t Russian enough to smash people with hammers". I don't know Matt, after two assassination attempts on Trump, under let's just call them suspicious circumstances, I feel their desperation has moved them into a new territory. They fear losing their traditional control of narratives to new media's increasing popularity. Thank you for your work.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Notice how the media currently draws parallels with Trump and Hitler. Often lately they mention that Hitler survived more than one assassin attempt. “ you see, it’s Trumps reprehensible thoughts and words” that make him a target.

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

YES

Expand full comment
The Biz's avatar

Well matt, either this to shall pass, or it will get worse and they will find a way to silence you. All you can do is whatever you can do until you can’t do it anymore. If you have a family, I would be careful. The really motivated folks out there don’t seem to have a limiting principle in how they shut people up. They have no shame. After seeing a lot of Trump people get dragged through the courts, bankrupted and some even spending time in jail, I’d say keep your lawyer close and don’t ever talk to a fed without him or her. I’m sorry this is happening to you. Not the ruffling of feathers so much, your work was always going to cause that. I’m sorry that that they are attacking you the way they are by trying to destroy your reputation as an honest purveyor of our reality. For someone such as yourself, I’m sure it’s worse than prison. And I’m sorry it’s coming from the left.

Trust me, it hurts me too. Both my parents went to college, my dad was both drafted to go to Vietnam and protested it afterwards. My mom was a flower child in the 70s (they are 8 years apart) and got kicked out of her bougie catholic school for writing an article supporting abortion. Then she went to work for the state of Michigan and my dad went to work at a factory after dropping out of grad school, and they both became union members. All that combined with the Irish-Catholic-Kennedy tradition and we were as blue as they come. I grew up that way. It’s hard to see what the party has become, what the left has become. The days of fighting to protect everyone’s basic civil rights are over. Now they are trying to justify destroying them. I’m not surprised we have come to this, I knew after 9/11 and the Patriot act that their new found powers would be impossible to not abuse eventually, but I just assumed that danger would come from dick Cheney and the republicans. Turns out it’s coming from dick Cheney and the democrats. It’s soul crushing. All you can do is keep on telling the truth, digging and hoping for a better future.

Expand full comment
Alice Ball's avatar

Thank you for this comment. My heart breaks for what our country has become. The only way forward is Trump. He is the bull in the China shop, like him or not. Our government is so corrupted, and the result is that the American people will suffer while our enemies triumph. China, Russia, and Iran are Allied now. The only way out is Pro American Trump.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

We struggle with the tactics of the left, not only their positions on current social structure. They think like criminals. They respond to pretty much like anything like criminals. They plan and scheme like criminals. They attack on all fronts : supremes, executive branches, etc. They run plantations. They are hard to counter because we don’t think like them. We don’t think like criminals. I still believe we can hold them at bay while we attempt to right the ship. Can we hold back the criminal enterprise for ever? Not sure.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

the Dems are NOT THE LEFT

gah!!! this on purpose muddying of political stances is part of the crazymaking !

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Then the proper and true Democrats should separate themselves from the Marxist Left.

Expand full comment
Miep's avatar

It's totally intentional. If you rebrand all language that is used in authoritarian contexts as "leftism" then it becomes much easier to shut down any discussion of actual leftism, and much more difficult to challenge capitalism.

Expand full comment
ShereaS2's avatar

Then when will the Dems distance themselves from The Left? They seem awfully cozy for a long time now.

Expand full comment
Miep's avatar

The Democratic Party is owned top down by billionaire capitalists. Everything else is kabuki. When's the last time you saw any of these people argue to nationalize anything? THEY'RE NOT LEFTISTS also they get more authoritarian all the time, so they're also not anarchists or any kind of libertarian.

Expand full comment
Curling Iron's avatar

Wait. But rule by billionaires makes them Marxist, right?

Help us out. We just heard of Marxism a few months ago.

Expand full comment
Miep's avatar

Then I guess that means I was not addressing you. Can’t a person rant in peace around here?

Expand full comment
Patrick's avatar

Was a dem in my younger days, till I realized they were bigger assholes than the people I was protesting against. Hang in there. Dems and Repubs alike.

Expand full comment
JanetS's avatar

I am a child of FDR Democrats. I loved Bill Clinton but I do not recognize these people anymore. The conservatives are now the cool freedom fighters. My liberal friends have drank the Kool-aid and think censorship and restriction of free speech is a good thing. There are dark forces at play behind such evil. Liberty and Democracy cannot hold when lively and free debate are restricted. Period.

Expand full comment
furies's avatar

"Bill CLinton is/was instrumental in the collapse we're seeing now;

see Haiti/ending welfare as we know it/NAFTA etc etc

Plllleeeeeze with the 'bill clinton' ... a grifting, mafia family of scum

"liberty" and "justice" man, where have you been??

Expand full comment
Peacelady's avatar

Liberals are not the left. They never really were. Recall Phil Och’s tune ‘Love Me I’m a Liberal.’ I hang out with the left. None of us are liberals or Democrats. There’s a lot of resistance to what I just said on here. People like me are inconvenient to Libertarians who prefer to lump us all into ‘the left’ when referring to Democrats. It’s intellectually lazy. Also notice how many independent reporters who do lean left are being targeted for reporting inconvenient truths.

Expand full comment
Craig Monroe's avatar

As censorship doesn't seem to be working, I'm worried about the October surprise or even worse the November/December/January "emergency".

Expand full comment
Annette H's avatar

You are courageous Matt.

Thank You.

Expand full comment
Skip Carpenter's avatar

What the actual fuck happened to this country? It was incredible.

Expand full comment
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

the Dems lost the 2016 election. one election!

Expand full comment
rob Wright's avatar

Can I like this 100 times? The button won't let me hit it that many.

Expand full comment
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

thanks!

so simple, yet so insane ;)

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

ME TOO

Expand full comment
Julinthecrown's avatar

I think it was more than just politics and just that one election. I think this whole culture of entitlement & Karen/Chad-ness of "I can tell YOU what to do but you daren't raise a peep about MY views" AND the fact that so many of us let them kick us without fighting back. There's also apathy, "it's not my job" mentality etc.

Expand full comment
gortroe's avatar

Revolutions are always enacted by the middle class which has the means and opportunities to revolt when their interests are being threatened, be these economic or cultural. As the poor do not have means and opportunities to revolt, they do so only when they are desperate (Bread riots). Even when the people in the middle class recognize that government has become their enemy, only a fraction of its members active resist--people like Matt and his colleagues, for example. Thus, they pay the price for all of us who restrict our actions to following these courageous people and commenting, hoping our heroes don't wear out--or get taken out. It's true that most of us don't have a bully pulpit but I believe there are things we could do to support the movement for government responsibility. Sharing what we learn from Matt and fellow posters, for example. Doing our own fact checking and research to support our positions. Avoiding the "But Trump" trap is another.The rot in our government has NOTHING to do with Trump. And he may not be able to clean it up. But he is the only one who is pointing out the rot. It's a start. And THEY know it!

Expand full comment
Julinthecrown's avatar

gortroe, I couldn't have said it any better. I am doing all the things that you mentioned - sharing, fact checking, researching - it's just tough to find those who are willing to listen or read. I feel as tho I am doing what I can in my little corner of the world. And while it might not be enough to channel an election, at least I know that I may be a teeny tiny part of the solution. Guess I'd better qualify the last part of that sentence - I'm part of the solution if you want America to be the great country that she is and always has been by electing Donal Trump as President.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

The deep-state warmonger Uniparty lost. That was the problem, not which party nominally won.

Expand full comment
gortroe's avatar

Elections became billion dollar affairs?

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

There are trillions at stake.

Expand full comment
Han's avatar

Enabling Acts.

Expand full comment
BobbyD's avatar

I grudgingly “liked” the article. There’s nothing likeable about this situation.

Expand full comment
Jala's avatar

Feel same BobbyD! Was gonna post same to Matt along with “ no more smooth sailing” doesn’t even begin to express the awfulness of your situation Matt & your peers as well.

Expand full comment
Phisto Sobanii's avatar

They'll have to pry my Racket News subscription from my cold, dead hands.

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

lol, like

Expand full comment
Rachel's avatar

This was very hard to read. Extremely upsetting. Thinking of you and your family and thank you for your work.

Expand full comment
AnnieG.Hill's avatar

You really can’t be too paranoid, the uniparty is capable of anything in pursuit of Full Spectrum Dominance.

Carl Jung said that Moby Dick was the quintessential American novel, but I didn’t realize that Ahab would rendezvous with his whale during my lifetime.

I sure hope it works out better this time.

Expand full comment
Eileen Thornton Renda's avatar

Dear Matt. Please be careful. Whoever is running our Government at the moment is undoubtedly willing to do anything to stay in power. Look at what they have done already. Wish I could surround you in a bulletproof bubble! 👍🏻🤞🙏

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

It's bigger than staying in power, at least for those at the top. It's about transitioning away from Western democracy and the nation-state to a global-centric technocratic/technological authoritarianism.

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

concur, totally

Expand full comment