If you've been paying attention at all for the last four years you'd know that Covid affects individuals in radically different ways, and science hasn't been able to explain why.
Most healthy 30-year-olds are able to clear the infection after a few days without anything more than a case of the sniffles. Some healthy 30-year-olds end up on…
If you've been paying attention at all for the last four years you'd know that Covid affects individuals in radically different ways, and science hasn't been able to explain why.
Most healthy 30-year-olds are able to clear the infection after a few days without anything more than a case of the sniffles. Some healthy 30-year-olds end up on a ventilator in the hospital's ICU for weeks. Why the difference? I don't know. Nobody does.
So you were symptomatic with Covid for one night and your wife was symptomatic for ten days. Does that mean your treatment regime worked? Not at all. That sort of experience is typical for couples with Covid regardless of how it's treated.
If you'd been paying attention to my post while reading it, you might have noticed that I literaly say, " Is the protocol the reason? Can't say for sure".
And if you'd been paying attention enough to see the science that has come out since the pharma-funded media campaign against IVM, you'd know that a meta-analysis of quality IVM studies showed likely effectiveness against death is published in one of the most regarded universites in Canada, McMaster. So, no, it's not just my anecdotal evidence that supports the "moderately-certain" conclusion that Ivermectin "may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease." There is a body of scientific evidence that suggests it.
You're right, you did originally write that qualifier, and I did notice it.
But, qualifier or not, inferring anything from your sample size of two is nonsense. That's like saying "my car is green. does that mean all cars are green? no, but I'll let you draw your own conclusions." There is no conclusion to be drawn from your experience.
Thanks for the link to the ivermectin research. I'll check it out. I am open minded about this, at least to a point. I'm happy to believe that it may be effective to some degree. If it was hugely effective then no cover-up in the world would have hidden that fact, but, some efficacy? Sure, maybe.
With all do respect, you have too much homework to do to come to any conclusions yet. You say you're open minded in sentence one of a paragraph and prove you aren't by the last. Good luck.
Think about it. If ivermectin was a cure for Covid, then a bunch of countries around the world would have figured it out and nobody in those countries would have died from Covid. Sure, there was probably pressure from world powers to buy vaccines and avoid ivermectin, and that would have worked on SOME countries, but certainly not all of them. And the same world powers, including the world powers that don't get along with each other and have no incentive to cooperate about anything, all concluded that ivermectin shouldn't be first-line treatment. So it can't all be a big conspiracy.
I am open minded, in the sense of, I think it's possible that ivermectin can have some beneficial effect. There are a lot of people who think it's impossible. But if you think ivermectin is essentially a cure for Covid, you might as well also believe that it can make you fly around like Superman.
Again, you are too uninformed to have an intelligent conversation with me about this... and every reply you make reinforces that notion. Go waste someone else's time.
If you've been paying attention at all for the last four years you'd know that Covid affects individuals in radically different ways, and science hasn't been able to explain why.
Most healthy 30-year-olds are able to clear the infection after a few days without anything more than a case of the sniffles. Some healthy 30-year-olds end up on a ventilator in the hospital's ICU for weeks. Why the difference? I don't know. Nobody does.
So you were symptomatic with Covid for one night and your wife was symptomatic for ten days. Does that mean your treatment regime worked? Not at all. That sort of experience is typical for couples with Covid regardless of how it's treated.
If you'd been paying attention to my post while reading it, you might have noticed that I literaly say, " Is the protocol the reason? Can't say for sure".
And if you'd been paying attention enough to see the science that has come out since the pharma-funded media campaign against IVM, you'd know that a meta-analysis of quality IVM studies showed likely effectiveness against death is published in one of the most regarded universites in Canada, McMaster. So, no, it's not just my anecdotal evidence that supports the "moderately-certain" conclusion that Ivermectin "may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease." There is a body of scientific evidence that suggests it.
https://healthevidence.org/view-article.aspx?a=ivermectin-prevention-treatment-covid-19-infection-systematic-review-meta-41106
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMaster_University
We know a lot more about covid, how it works and treatment possibilities than you suggest. Keep up.
You're right, you did originally write that qualifier, and I did notice it.
But, qualifier or not, inferring anything from your sample size of two is nonsense. That's like saying "my car is green. does that mean all cars are green? no, but I'll let you draw your own conclusions." There is no conclusion to be drawn from your experience.
Thanks for the link to the ivermectin research. I'll check it out. I am open minded about this, at least to a point. I'm happy to believe that it may be effective to some degree. If it was hugely effective then no cover-up in the world would have hidden that fact, but, some efficacy? Sure, maybe.
With all do respect, you have too much homework to do to come to any conclusions yet. You say you're open minded in sentence one of a paragraph and prove you aren't by the last. Good luck.
Think about it. If ivermectin was a cure for Covid, then a bunch of countries around the world would have figured it out and nobody in those countries would have died from Covid. Sure, there was probably pressure from world powers to buy vaccines and avoid ivermectin, and that would have worked on SOME countries, but certainly not all of them. And the same world powers, including the world powers that don't get along with each other and have no incentive to cooperate about anything, all concluded that ivermectin shouldn't be first-line treatment. So it can't all be a big conspiracy.
I am open minded, in the sense of, I think it's possible that ivermectin can have some beneficial effect. There are a lot of people who think it's impossible. But if you think ivermectin is essentially a cure for Covid, you might as well also believe that it can make you fly around like Superman.
Again, you are too uninformed to have an intelligent conversation with me about this... and every reply you make reinforces that notion. Go waste someone else's time.