I'd disagree. Norway is energized 100% with hydroelectric and Iceland by geothermal. Use what works best for the location, utilizing local resources, if possible.
You’re the kind of dumbass who was screaming for nuclear before we knew it was safe. Fucking primitive. I mean libertarian. That’s the politically correct term for you inebriates, right?
Yeah nuclear is fine and much safer than it was 30-40 years ago.
Okay, it wasn't clear before whether you were legitimate or just trolling, but you've now made it clear. No reasonable person would ever jump to the ridiculous extreme conclusions you do about the people you're responding to. Giving you the benefit of the doubt that you don't have mental issues, the only other possibility is that you're just trolling. So please stop wasting everyone's time, it's not very good trolling.
I love the John Cleese quote that stupid people are so stupid they don’t even realize how stupid they are. Hence I don’t have to listen to your arm chair psych evaluations.
Also stupid ppl aren’t allowed to be smug either. It makes both traits exponentially worse. Just some advice.
Yeah I’m fine with nuclear. Especially since I’d like to see as little mining done as possible and I’m not inherent to trust corporations to not act in the most cost cutting ways to extract the resources for their batteries and disposal of them in said countries without regulations on a global level. There, better?
I vote: All of the above, where appropriate, including nuclear power. I'd consider a micro molten salt reactor to energize my remote mining operation.
I’d suggest the only appropriate answer is nuclear. Everything else just doesn’t hold a candle.
I'd disagree. Norway is energized 100% with hydroelectric and Iceland by geothermal. Use what works best for the location, utilizing local resources, if possible.
Iceland is definitely an edge case. Norway probably too.
Through what they do is good.
My point being, use whatever works best for the location. Don't sit on un- or under-utilized resources.
Stage 1 civilization when
I agree. Competitive advantage and staying in balance with an area’s ecosystem.
You’re the kind of dumbass who was screaming for nuclear before we knew it was safe. Fucking primitive. I mean libertarian. That’s the politically correct term for you inebriates, right?
Yeah nuclear is fine and much safer than it was 30-40 years ago.
Okay, it wasn't clear before whether you were legitimate or just trolling, but you've now made it clear. No reasonable person would ever jump to the ridiculous extreme conclusions you do about the people you're responding to. Giving you the benefit of the doubt that you don't have mental issues, the only other possibility is that you're just trolling. So please stop wasting everyone's time, it's not very good trolling.
Aww the libertardian thinks it’s ppl. How cute.
I love the John Cleese quote that stupid people are so stupid they don’t even realize how stupid they are. Hence I don’t have to listen to your arm chair psych evaluations.
Also stupid ppl aren’t allowed to be smug either. It makes both traits exponentially worse. Just some advice.
Fuck me you’re a cunt.
John Cleese. Lol. Who cares what he thinks?
Give it up, dude. You've been called on your troll. Doubling down at this point just makes you look desperate for attention.
Oh no, you said the magic word! I’m powerless now…
okay, good luck with that
U mad bro?
Yeah I’m fine with nuclear. Especially since I’d like to see as little mining done as possible and I’m not inherent to trust corporations to not act in the most cost cutting ways to extract the resources for their batteries and disposal of them in said countries without regulations on a global level. There, better?
Not really.
You should’ve apologized first.