From same comment mentioned above (IM Doc on Naked Capitalism...)
"Remdesevir is loaded with all kinds of safety problems that I have seen with my own eyes. And it has the extra benefit of obviously not working – it literally does not do a god damned thing. Multiple studies have hinted at this."
It was my understanding that remdasivir was given early on with mixed results. At that time no one knew WHAT worked and so doctors were trying all sorts of things.
Working in pharma, this is true. Remdesavir should not have been approved in my opinion. It's a lousy drug that barely works.
From same comment mentioned above (IM Doc on Naked Capitalism...)
"Remdesevir is loaded with all kinds of safety problems that I have seen with my own eyes. And it has the extra benefit of obviously not working – it literally does not do a god damned thing. Multiple studies have hinted at this."
Seems to agree with you.
Yeah. I looked at the data. It sucked.
It was my understanding that remdasivir was given early on with mixed results. At that time no one knew WHAT worked and so doctors were trying all sorts of things.