Not a huge fan of, "You should support this because it might help you." It's like, "You don't like racism? But let me explain how it could help you personally." A pretty shallow argument.
If a person can't see that free speech is a good thing, and that controlling "free speech" destroys free speech, well, are they even worth persuading?
Not a huge fan of, "You should support this because it might help you." It's like, "You don't like racism? But let me explain how it could help you personally." A pretty shallow argument.
If a person can't see that free speech is a good thing, and that controlling "free speech" destroys free speech, well, are they even worth persuading?
Not a huge fan of, "You should support this because it might help you." It's like, "You don't like racism? But let me explain how it could help you personally." A pretty shallow argument.
If a person can't see that free speech is a good thing, and that controlling "free speech" destroys free speech, well, are they even worth persuading?
that's the most ridiculous example ever.
Actually nobody, there are simply no statistically relevant portions of the United States population that supports racism. none.
that's the problem. The ACLU and SPLC have no natural racists to target, so they working as hard as they can to create em.
meanwhile the rest of us have to live in the swamp those creeps keep manipulating to get money, power and votes.
It's disgusting.
Just for the record: "nobody" does not equate to "no statistically relevant portions."
I don't disagree with your point, but let's keep it precise.
Ok. no statistically relevant portions