-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in…
-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (p < 0.0001).
-- There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion (from the study): In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.
The fact that they're using Ron Johnson as some form of reference doesn't exactly lend credence to the situation. I'm firmly in the camp of those questioning the authorities on Covid, but Ron Johnson is in my neck of the woods, I'm familiar with his positions on a wide range of topics, and the guy is a cognitive hockey puck.
If folks want to believe what this loon has to say, that's fine, I don't care. But, if he's being used as some sort of confirmation of a study, then it's in everyone's best interest to deeply question the study.
-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (p < 0.0001).
-- There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion (from the study): In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates
COVID 19 is a new virus to man. Everyone looks at studies reporting to say something but due to different circumstances they say nothing. It will take time using meta-analysis and disinterested parties allowing research to come out.
The only thing they say for sure is Obese people are dead people. We shouldn't take care of anybody that does not take care of them selves. Well I am obese along with 60% of the other Americans.
HCQ probably works better than Ivermectin. HCQ has been used to treat Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis for years. HCQ is a Zn ionophore, changing cell PH, and thus inhibits glycosylation, RNA protease replication. HCQ also mitigates immune response it is used for LUPUS and Arthritis. Dexamethazone is used for this.
Ivermectin only acts as a protease inhibitor. In Vitro response was found to be positive in: "Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2." (1)
Ivermectin was found to be a broad spectrum antiviral in invitro tests. Studies are advocated by parties that have an interest in what works. It will take time for truth to come out. It always does.
-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (p < 0.0001).
-- There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion (from the study): In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates
PS: At the same time, we must hate China because of CIA-invented "genocides" there -- fabrications relentlessly spread by lunatic "religion" Falun Gong's "newspaper" The Epoch Times... Dr. Malone actively promotes Falun Gong's Epoch Times -- go figure...
I agree with you (that Ivermectin probably works). The reality is that the studies proving it works will not be recognized by those making decisions on what to study and what to use. There is a great deal of politics nationally and internationally. You and I can't change it.
One thing I do know is there are bureaucrats with way too much power. Dr. F_uc_ is one of them. His competency as a spokesman is compromised. The ability to hand out money for research grants is also compromised. We need to change dinosaurs in government with those that work for the people, not corporate interests. The government lost sight of who they are working for.
The American people pay for the pharma research, through the NIH and BARDA. Once approved the drugs go to "Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), a United Nations-backed public health organization working to increase access to life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries." The American tax payer pays regular prices and other countries get to manufacture the drug and sell it for generic prices. Molnupiravir and Paxlovir are two examples of this.
1/3 of the cost of American labor is health insurance. Heath insurance makes American labor costs noncompetitive in the world. The world lives on the back of the American worker.
You seem to be wrapped up in numbers and statistics, trying to prove a point. Just say the system is corrupt and we don't want to take it.
There are studies that say Ivermectin does not work.
The system in place and the bureaucrats in the system. Big Pharma and the US govt are creating drugs. Repurposed pharma ruin the potential for creating drugs. Drugs hurt the necessity for vaccines. F_uc_ is all about creating vaccines then therapeutics.
Reading up and....Malone is clearly brilliant and still yet another self actualized tribune in the demoralizing technocracy that has enlisted everyone as unpaid laborers for social-media platforms that profit from online confused animosity.
No one is willing to debate these "self actualized" people. This "gang" includes Steve Kirsch. Steve has a standing offer of $1 million to anyone that debates any of these heroes in front of a video recording device.
I'll be waiting with the crickets to hear you make a substantive post with facts and data to backup your position . . . . whatever position that might be, at whatever time of day you post it.
Everywhere a puzzling and completely irrational DNC/media/security state propaganda.
BUT -- there is a VERY rational reason for that.
We are dealing with BIG Lie(s)
ANY, even rudimentary, discussion would unravel the lie(s) -- total censorship and prompt defamations are the ONLY choice for the immensely corrupt Deep State cabal.
PS: A sad thing is that GOP lunatics are equally repulsive and dangerous -- happily grunting together while feeding at same donor troughs.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-and-more-in-the-news
-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (p < 0.0001).
-- There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion (from the study): In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.
The fact that they're using Ron Johnson as some form of reference doesn't exactly lend credence to the situation. I'm firmly in the camp of those questioning the authorities on Covid, but Ron Johnson is in my neck of the woods, I'm familiar with his positions on a wide range of topics, and the guy is a cognitive hockey puck.
If folks want to believe what this loon has to say, that's fine, I don't care. But, if he's being used as some sort of confirmation of a study, then it's in everyone's best interest to deeply question the study.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-and-more-in-the-news
-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (p < 0.0001).
-- There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion (from the study): In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates
COVID 19 is a new virus to man. Everyone looks at studies reporting to say something but due to different circumstances they say nothing. It will take time using meta-analysis and disinterested parties allowing research to come out.
The only thing they say for sure is Obese people are dead people. We shouldn't take care of anybody that does not take care of them selves. Well I am obese along with 60% of the other Americans.
HCQ probably works better than Ivermectin. HCQ has been used to treat Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis for years. HCQ is a Zn ionophore, changing cell PH, and thus inhibits glycosylation, RNA protease replication. HCQ also mitigates immune response it is used for LUPUS and Arthritis. Dexamethazone is used for this.
Ivermectin only acts as a protease inhibitor. In Vitro response was found to be positive in: "Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2." (1)
Ivermectin was found to be a broad spectrum antiviral in invitro tests. Studies are advocated by parties that have an interest in what works. It will take time for truth to come out. It always does.
(1) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32533071/
Thank you -- I am incompetent, like other 99.9% of readers) to judge what you are posting. I noted Dr. Malone's recently:
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-and-more-in-the-news
-- There was a with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate for the cohorts using ivermectin prophylactically (p < 0.0001).
-- The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (p < 0.0001).
-- There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion (from the study): In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates
PS: At the same time, we must hate China because of CIA-invented "genocides" there -- fabrications relentlessly spread by lunatic "religion" Falun Gong's "newspaper" The Epoch Times... Dr. Malone actively promotes Falun Gong's Epoch Times -- go figure...
I agree with you (that Ivermectin probably works). The reality is that the studies proving it works will not be recognized by those making decisions on what to study and what to use. There is a great deal of politics nationally and internationally. You and I can't change it.
One thing I do know is there are bureaucrats with way too much power. Dr. F_uc_ is one of them. His competency as a spokesman is compromised. The ability to hand out money for research grants is also compromised. We need to change dinosaurs in government with those that work for the people, not corporate interests. The government lost sight of who they are working for.
The American people pay for the pharma research, through the NIH and BARDA. Once approved the drugs go to "Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), a United Nations-backed public health organization working to increase access to life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries." The American tax payer pays regular prices and other countries get to manufacture the drug and sell it for generic prices. Molnupiravir and Paxlovir are two examples of this.
1/3 of the cost of American labor is health insurance. Heath insurance makes American labor costs noncompetitive in the world. The world lives on the back of the American worker.
You seem to be wrapped up in numbers and statistics, trying to prove a point. Just say the system is corrupt and we don't want to take it.
(1)https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-medicines-patent-pool-mpp-sign-licensing
IF indeed Ivermectin works AND
we have 900,000 thousand deaths AND
Ivermectin (used for more than 1 billion times and is VERY inexpensive) can't be obtained -- than
WHO is responsible for a CRIME of a century???
There are studies that say Ivermectin does not work.
The system in place and the bureaucrats in the system. Big Pharma and the US govt are creating drugs. Repurposed pharma ruin the potential for creating drugs. Drugs hurt the necessity for vaccines. F_uc_ is all about creating vaccines then therapeutics.
Reading up and....Malone is clearly brilliant and still yet another self actualized tribune in the demoralizing technocracy that has enlisted everyone as unpaid laborers for social-media platforms that profit from online confused animosity.
Why don't Malone's colleagues come out also? He's HMM-alone
No one is willing to debate these "self actualized" people. This "gang" includes Steve Kirsch. Steve has a standing offer of $1 million to anyone that debates any of these heroes in front of a video recording device.
: : CRICKETS : :
I'll be waiting with the crickets to hear you make a substantive post with facts and data to backup your position . . . . whatever position that might be, at whatever time of day you post it.
Ha
That'll be a hoot.
You providing information about anything.
How you gonna squeeze any information in about anything (save a beginners guide on trolling) with your ad hominem nonsense?
Kurtocracy?
Go ahead and throw Ron Johnson under the bus, I'll have a cool drink of water waiting for you when you're finished.
But do pay attention to all of the heroes he brings to the table.
Pay attention to the reality of experimental vaccines with zero data. That precludes INFORMED CONSENT.
Mandating a experimental medical procedure?
That is Medical ethical moral bankruptcy.
There were International Criminal Court trials on that sort of thing a little while ago . . . . . uh . . . . oh, right, the 1940's
Everywhere a puzzling and completely irrational DNC/media/security state propaganda.
BUT -- there is a VERY rational reason for that.
We are dealing with BIG Lie(s)
ANY, even rudimentary, discussion would unravel the lie(s) -- total censorship and prompt defamations are the ONLY choice for the immensely corrupt Deep State cabal.
PS: A sad thing is that GOP lunatics are equally repulsive and dangerous -- happily grunting together while feeding at same donor troughs.