I described my only evidence two posts up. That is, the very social milieu one would expect to be knowledgeable about them rejected them at the time they emerged, and warned all readers that it was a honey pot.
I described my only evidence two posts up. That is, the very social milieu one would expect to be knowledgeable about them rejected them at the time they emerged, and warned all readers that it was a honey pot.
That's still not close to being definitive evidence that they aren't what they say they are. Merely another philosophically like-minded subset with a "hunch." Let me know when somebody rubs the "honey pot" and G-Men genies emerge. Then we'll talk. Not saying you're wrong, but....
I described my only evidence two posts up. That is, the very social milieu one would expect to be knowledgeable about them rejected them at the time they emerged, and warned all readers that it was a honey pot.
That's still not close to being definitive evidence that they aren't what they say they are. Merely another philosophically like-minded subset with a "hunch." Let me know when somebody rubs the "honey pot" and G-Men genies emerge. Then we'll talk. Not saying you're wrong, but....
Ok thanks for sharing your thoughts. Cheers.