Agreed. I haven’t heard or read his stances on AGW, but if he’s as rational as he’s been on other issues, and he happens to view it as the crisis it’s purported to be, surely his approach is nuclear, right?
I mean, at least society could keep reliable energy that way.
Agreed. I haven’t heard or read his stances on AGW, but if he’s as rational as he’s been on other issues, and he happens to view it as the crisis it’s purported to be, surely his approach is nuclear, right?
I mean, at least society could keep reliable energy that way.
I don't know where he stands on it today, but in the past RFK Jr has been vehemently against nuclear as a clean energy source. The only thing that concerns me about him as a candidate.
Agreed. I haven’t heard or read his stances on AGW, but if he’s as rational as he’s been on other issues, and he happens to view it as the crisis it’s purported to be, surely his approach is nuclear, right?
I mean, at least society could keep reliable energy that way.
I don't know where he stands on it today, but in the past RFK Jr has been vehemently against nuclear as a clean energy source. The only thing that concerns me about him as a candidate.
Anti-nuclear is huge drawback for me. (Not as big an issue as full blown dementia and wild international corruption that may lead to WWIII, though… )
He was interviewed by Dane Wiggington of Geoengineeringwatch.com...
He is against nuclear, of course, as he should be.
"...as he should be".
Do tell.
His approach is using the free market. And not using fear to manipulate.