Reviewing the FBI presentation, slide by slide, seeing the details of all the various government departments and policies, once again served as a reminder of the BLOAT of our government and how off message every single department has become.
Far worse than "off message", unfortunately. Links in replies to expert testimony they will NEVER willingly tell you about. FBI targeting, CIA/DARPA tech, military administration. #NurembergII
I am sorry but this article was a ton of garbage. There is nothing close to Nazi style " experimentation" mentioned in this study. Like his last article, Lovelace is like a 2 with Matt being a 10
I didn't even read this one. I lost respect for Ryan Lovelace over his failure to rebut what appeared to be a logical, serious, and well-founded criticism in the comment section of his use of statistics in order to trash Kash Patel's F.B.I. One concludes that he has no answer; and if that is so, a reporter must fall on his sword and acknowledge error. He isn't even a 2 in my book.
I share your concern and suspect many of us do. Something's up with Matt. Maybe, as happened to Glenn G. and "System Update," he's taken on too much overhead with Racket and there's mission dilution. And exhaustion.
I am not telling myself anything. There is certainly nothing in the article or the documents that show otherwise. Until there is I will not form an opinion
Extremely sensationalist nonsense article about what essentially boils down to biometric collection with informed consent. What a complete fall from grace for Racket over the past few months.
It is trivial to collect saliva samples surreptitiously. The fact that subjects got disclosure AND $50 makes this seem like a failed attempted hit piece. Tossing in the obligatory ‘nazi’ reference just proves the point. Do better or do without my subscription $.
Where are you going for your news now that Racket is kaput? This particular article we are commenting on read to me like there’s nothing there. The Nazi tie wasn’t explained. Sensationalism. Where are now getting your news. I read Epoch Times but beyond that.
Various substacks written by people whose work I trust. Try Coffee and Covid, Jupplandia, Sasha Stone, Jotting in Purple. I also follow people on X--there you have to find people whose posts give good/current info. Reliability depends on who you follow. I use Grok AI to check on facts. That's a process--to find people who don't waste your time.
What exactly is the purpose of collecting this data? And, mere collection of saliva and some pictures, so to speak, is a far distance from “experimentation,” à la Mengele or even the CIA in the CIA in the 1950s.
It is a long article but I cannot tell if there is a “there,” there. What is the purpose, what are the risks, and why should I care?
I like that Matt wants to make Racket into a politically neutral investigative journalism hub, but if we have learned anything from the last decade or two it is that even talented reporters (and podcasters!) need good editors.
Well, not crazy about a lot of FBI behavior, that's for sure. But I'm not sure in practice this is going to be much different than the fact they have all our blood and health history on computers. They could store any biological matter on any of us at any time. Studying twins sounds like it could be beneficial if not abused. But now with computers and all, our privacy is gone and who knows what they could do with it.
Where in the world is Emily Kopp? I'd venture to say that the only organization less transparent than the FBI is The Racket. Maybe Ryan Lovelace can investigate? Meanwhile, in the grand tradition of spitballing on these pages here are my theories:
1) She realized what a MAGA swamp she landed in, and hightailed it out of here.
2) Walter Kirn kidnapped her and is holding her hostage in his basement in Montana.
3) She saw the plummeting subscriber base and thought better of it.
TORTURED TARGETED INDIVIDUALS are what else is being hidden. You can interview formerly FBI's Geral Sosbee and the late Ted Gunderson's affidavit (https://InfinityB.info/Gunderson).
Reviewing the FBI presentation, slide by slide, seeing the details of all the various government departments and policies, once again served as a reminder of the BLOAT of our government and how off message every single department has become.
Far worse than "off message", unfortunately. Links in replies to expert testimony they will NEVER willingly tell you about. FBI targeting, CIA/DARPA tech, military administration. #NurembergII
https://x.com/ProtectPatient1/status/1973173998948089966?s=20
I am sorry but this article was a ton of garbage. There is nothing close to Nazi style " experimentation" mentioned in this study. Like his last article, Lovelace is like a 2 with Matt being a 10
I didn't even read this one. I lost respect for Ryan Lovelace over his failure to rebut what appeared to be a logical, serious, and well-founded criticism in the comment section of his use of statistics in order to trash Kash Patel's F.B.I. One concludes that he has no answer; and if that is so, a reporter must fall on his sword and acknowledge error. He isn't even a 2 in my book.
I agree, but my question is whether Matt even edits or reviews this stuff before it is posted. I subscribed to Racket for Matt's reporting
I doubt that Matt has any involvement anymore. I'm an annual subscriber, and will not be renewing.
I share your concern and suspect many of us do. Something's up with Matt. Maybe, as happened to Glenn G. and "System Update," he's taken on too much overhead with Racket and there's mission dilution. And exhaustion.
You might consider a hobby other than bitching and griping about things.
You might consider getting a hobby other than calling paying subscribers' input as "bitching and griping about things."
Not worthy of response
you keep telling yourself that
I am not telling myself anything. There is certainly nothing in the article or the documents that show otherwise. Until there is I will not form an opinion
Extremely sensationalist nonsense article about what essentially boils down to biometric collection with informed consent. What a complete fall from grace for Racket over the past few months.
I remain dedicated to the proposition that our Security Services are a threat to the American people.
Yawn, and ZZZZzzzzzzzz.
It is trivial to collect saliva samples surreptitiously. The fact that subjects got disclosure AND $50 makes this seem like a failed attempted hit piece. Tossing in the obligatory ‘nazi’ reference just proves the point. Do better or do without my subscription $.
Whadya think ALL these "Data centers" are for?
This piece is a hit piece. It isn't journalism. Yellow journalism isn't what I expect from Racket News. But, oops. That Racket News is...dead.
Where are you going for your news now that Racket is kaput? This particular article we are commenting on read to me like there’s nothing there. The Nazi tie wasn’t explained. Sensationalism. Where are now getting your news. I read Epoch Times but beyond that.
Various substacks written by people whose work I trust. Try Coffee and Covid, Jupplandia, Sasha Stone, Jotting in Purple. I also follow people on X--there you have to find people whose posts give good/current info. Reliability depends on who you follow. I use Grok AI to check on facts. That's a process--to find people who don't waste your time.
This article intentionally misleads the reader into believing the FBI conducted experiments on twins.
In actuality, they collected saliva samples but no experiments were conducted on them.
This article:
Raises questions
Points to loosely related documents
Suggests a narrative
But it does not meet the threshold of evidence for the claim.
What exactly is the purpose of collecting this data? And, mere collection of saliva and some pictures, so to speak, is a far distance from “experimentation,” à la Mengele or even the CIA in the CIA in the 1950s.
It is a long article but I cannot tell if there is a “there,” there. What is the purpose, what are the risks, and why should I care?
I like that Matt wants to make Racket into a politically neutral investigative journalism hub, but if we have learned anything from the last decade or two it is that even talented reporters (and podcasters!) need good editors.
The US government loves to experiment on service members. I’d love to see those files. 😂
Well, not crazy about a lot of FBI behavior, that's for sure. But I'm not sure in practice this is going to be much different than the fact they have all our blood and health history on computers. They could store any biological matter on any of us at any time. Studying twins sounds like it could be beneficial if not abused. But now with computers and all, our privacy is gone and who knows what they could do with it.
Where in the world is Emily Kopp? I'd venture to say that the only organization less transparent than the FBI is The Racket. Maybe Ryan Lovelace can investigate? Meanwhile, in the grand tradition of spitballing on these pages here are my theories:
1) She realized what a MAGA swamp she landed in, and hightailed it out of here.
2) Walter Kirn kidnapped her and is holding her hostage in his basement in Montana.
3) She saw the plummeting subscriber base and thought better of it.
4) She's on vacation.
TORTURED TARGETED INDIVIDUALS are what else is being hidden. You can interview formerly FBI's Geral Sosbee and the late Ted Gunderson's affidavit (https://InfinityB.info/Gunderson).
I guess I don’t get why these kinds of studies fall under the FBI’s responsibility. It’s all just ‘weird’.
Thought this was a joke, but now I'm confused either way.