90 Comments

I was told and taught in school way back when that there were laws barring government sponsored domestic propaganda operations in the USA. Just like the immigration situation though, I guess rules and laws were meant to be broken.

Expand full comment
Jan 31·edited Jan 31

The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act was signed into law by Barack Obama in 2012. It authorizes the federal government to lie to the American public en masse via propaganda paid for by the American public. The biggest single source publisher has long been Pentagon. "Modernization" and the prefix "neo-" both mean "the opposite of" or "the destruction of" in US parlance, which makes perfect sense if the future has knowingly been perceived as a totalitarian one all along.

Expand full comment

Sadly, I read about this act just yesterday. I had thought myself politically aware of significant legislation. Obviously I'm not. That this law exists is just further proof of a Unload th that cares nothing for our Constitution and individual rights.

Expand full comment

Uniparty not unload th. Spell check should be abolished.

Expand full comment
founding

Yeah! What the duck!!!

Expand full comment

Right! I couldn’t recall the moniker. Thanks!

🏆

Expand full comment

I will definitely have to look this one up. Thanks!

Expand full comment

see my reply up above for link

Expand full comment

Smith-Mundt is recognition that we're now engaged in a digital-information war with other adversarial nations. It's a new paradigm of global conflict that the U.S., comparative to other nations, has been slow to acknowledge and adopt. It's recognition that we're now fighting a different sort of global stochastic war of propaganda. Is this a good thing? Difficult to argue that it is. Surprising? Difficult to argue that it is. Welcome to the 21st century, citizen.

Personally, I'd worry more about the bad corporate actors who are mining your personal data from your phone than dull-witted news releases with a little coloring-in from low-level desk jockeys at the State Dept. or Rand Corporation. Why not embrace Big Brother? We all need a big hug from time to time.

Not to deflect, but question: what are you going to do about it? What have you as a citizen done about nuclear proliferation? Or the the fact that your drinking water is most probably poisonous compliments of a multitude of U.S. corporations? Or that American automobiles and the roads they travel is one big Death Network Ponzi scheme? And as a citizen of the U.S., one could on and on, no?

Expand full comment

@Someone From Texas

You are thinking of the 1948 Smith-Mundt act. It was amended in 2012 to allow that which it had been specifically intended to prevent, with additional changes in 2016.

https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-establishment-media-lying-about-the-us-removal-of-the-propaganda-act/#Executive_Summary

Expand full comment
founding

But at least now it is noticed.

Expand full comment

It most definitely is being noticed and noted, and that’s why they’re freaking out.

Expand full comment

Your comment reminded me of one of the first poems I ever wrote. Valid then (1965); still valid now.

I read somewhere

That people have a right

To speak and assemble and petition.

I think I saw written

In the back of a textbook

That has been

Discontinued.

Expand full comment

There was a “legal” rule change passed I believe at the end of the Obama administration, to allow domestic propaganda if I am not mistaken.

Edit:

The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act was signed into law by Barack Obama in 2012

Props to Bret Bowman and Billy Masterson for verifying and naming.

Expand full comment

See and decide for yourself https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736

However the first result when search on "Obama made it legal to propagandize Americans" is from AP, clearing the matter up for us confused pleebs. https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-7064410002

Expand full comment

Designed to be broken with all those lawyerly loopholes, more like.

Expand full comment

"...they’ll have to at least make a conscious decision to suck each time now."

I can't imagine half the stories the MSM has put out over the last 8 years as being the result of anything else.

Expand full comment

"...they’ll have to at least make a conscious decision to suck each time now."

That assumes they are capable of such self awareness.

Expand full comment

Matt.....Jen Easterly, Director of CISA, and other Deep Staters today said that the Chinese are planning a massive Cyber Attack on the USA to "induce societal panic." Part of me is insulted as Americans are perfectly capable of inducing societal panic on their own, without any external assistance. The other part of me (the part that read every word of the Twitter Files) wonders if this is the first fusillade in an effort to pre-condition the information environment in advance of Election 2024. That is how little I trust these people.

Expand full comment

Sir Galahad - look out your window. The sun is still shining. The sky is still blue. Don’t let this stuff drag you down - be cognizant of it, and continue to live your life. If you don’t, they win.

Expand full comment

Excellent thought. I’m a well-to-do early retiree who has always voted Democrat, because I believed them that they were the party of workers’ rights and free speech. Now even those are gone from any Dem platform. No way in hell am I voting for Biden this time.

But regardless of whether he or Trump wins, neither of which I believe would be especially good for America, my life won’t change much. And the sun still shines in that beautiful blue sky you mention.

There are far too many people in both parties who believe life will end for them if the other wins. It won’t.

Expand full comment

100% correct! Everyone needs to give thoughtful consideration of what hills are truly worth dying on. It can’t be very many, and you better make sure it’s worth it.

Expand full comment

Yes, and it's reminiscent of the incessant fearmongering of the "imminent China cyber attacks" back in 2011/12 the government used as a pretext for increasing digital surveillance of the citizenry. I didn't buy it then, and I don't buy it now.

Expand full comment

Independent journalism has been one of the few bright rays to emerge from our current dark times. It is shining a light into the dark and rotten corners of legacy media at a time when the rot threatens to fill the whole room. My heroes are Musk (for bringing independent journalists in to inspect), and all of you brave souls that answered the call for the good of our democratic republic.

Expand full comment

"As anyone who’s read Thomas Frank’s excellent The People, No knows, the propaganda technique of denouncing populist challengers to the status quo as bigots or traitorous trumpeters of foreign disinformation is an ancient method, one proven to work across more than a century. "

A favorite trope in the Civil Rights Era South was "outside agitators are stirring up our negroes!"

Expand full comment

I continue to be proud to be a subscriber. Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment

SUPER important that we protect FOIA laws from Congressional meddling.

Expand full comment

It's becoming more prevalent for government employees and agencies to use personal emails in order to avoid FOIA. That gives you an idea of the mindset of these people.

Expand full comment

Who knew Hillary was such a trailblazer! And I suspect that anyone in the CIA has never used any phone other than a burner. But those FOIA requests are always refused anyway, for “national security” reasons.

Remember when we could actually have faith when the government talked about national security?

Expand full comment

And then pseudonyms.

Expand full comment

Yea for independent journalists! Continue to bring (and reveal) the receipts.

Expand full comment

This American is not shrugging.

Expand full comment

Atlas is currently.

Expand full comment

more good work!

Expand full comment
founding

UK, like US, is governed by a fascist uni-party.

Expand full comment

Go Racket News. Proud to support.

Expand full comment

Thanks & keep it coming Matt! This all matters!

Expand full comment

How is this different from al shartpton's national action network which openly promotes candidates and policy and is a 501c? Or other groups... aclu , common cause, rainbow coalition etc?

Expand full comment

Good point. But Rev Al isn’t a formal party official. Maybe that’s the difference. And the rev ain’t trying to undermine speech.

(Did you deliberately write his name as Shart-pton? 😂)

Expand full comment
founding

Would be great to reprint these 2 pieces together.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your ongoing great work!

Expand full comment