True. He wasn’t. I was pretty angry after 911(like many Americans). My inclination was to take out two terrorist supporting regime’s rapidly and leave rapidly then make it (unofficial) policy that if you finance or accommodate terrorists we will destroy you
True. He wasn’t. I was pretty angry after 911(like many Americans). My inclination was to take out two terrorist supporting regime’s rapidly and leave rapidly then make it (unofficial) policy that if you finance or accommodate terrorists we will destroy you
There's something mighty funny going on there. I don't pretend to know the full who what when where or why of it. But whatever it is, it's more than a couple of stray data points matched up with a hundred leading questions. I've read all too many books that work that way. But Triple Cross is not one of them.
True. He wasn’t. I was pretty angry after 911(like many Americans). My inclination was to take out two terrorist supporting regime’s rapidly and leave rapidly then make it (unofficial) policy that if you finance or accommodate terrorists we will destroy you
Yes, but invading the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would be bad for business. Anyway, [redacted]
I'm just [redacted]
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/triple-cross-peter-lance/1111738687
There's something mighty funny going on there. I don't pretend to know the full who what when where or why of it. But whatever it is, it's more than a couple of stray data points matched up with a hundred leading questions. I've read all too many books that work that way. But Triple Cross is not one of them.