So assuming all the terrorists are Muslims just assume all Muslims are terrorists, eliminate all the Muslims, in the process all the terrorists. What of the Muslims that are not terrorists? No one gives a fuck about them anyway.
So assuming all the terrorists are Muslims just assume all Muslims are terrorists, eliminate all the Muslims, in the process all the terrorists. What of the Muslims that are not terrorists? No one gives a fuck about them anyway.
If anything, we should look at the fact of human brainwashing. This is so prevalent in all this that to just speak of Islamophobia is only a small example. Christianity is no better and all is an aberrational power structure that is destructive and comes from self hatred.
Clearly, you've never opened a book of logic in your life. No, that conclusion doesn't follow from a claim about how the word 'Islamophobia' is customarily employed. The intent is always to undermine legitimate criticism by pretending it's simply an expression of psychological malady in the critic, a form of ad hominemism that itself is a logical fallacy. The unwillingness of apologists to come to grips with Islam's sad history of terrorist atrocities is the most obvious example, and if your aim here is to speak up on behalf of Islam you might reflect on the fact that this particular evasive tactic hurts primarily Muslims themselves, since statistically they are by far the principal victims of such atrocities.
In any event, this is a side issue. Are you at all interested in the point of the post, which isn't even slightly concerned with Islam or terrorism? People are familiar with the 'Islamophobia' strategy, so referencing it as a conceptual aid to seeing that the 'misinformation' dodge sabotages dialogue in much the same way made sense. Do you care about that little problem--the one of evasion by terminological subterfuge--which at least has the advantage of being relevant to the article to which my post replies?
Right. Islamophobia is disinformation when used in the context of recasting your Islamophobia as an irrational psychological aberration. Brilliant. Let's not call it Islamophobia. Let's call it ... NORMAL !!! Then let's assume they are all terrorists and eliminate them all !!!
That you're gratuitously rude and abusive as well as ignorant was predictable. For the record, I taught logic to undergraduates on the way to getting my M.A. in philosophy... and on the basis of your performance here you would have failed to master even the basic difference between Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens. The odds seem high you'll pass the rest of your life knowing the mysteries of logic only by hearsay.
By all means, though, continue comically (and irrelevantly) bloviating. From each according to his ability.
I make it a point of pride to be rude to Nazis. Those who can do. Those who can't teach. You are living proof. Another logical fallacy prevalent on Nazi sites like this one is as long as you get the last word you win. You are embarrassing yourself but by all means get the last word if you need to. You still lose.
You're living proof that those with a predilection for rudeness will find targets for it, even if they have to manufacture the targets themselves, evidence free. Thanks for the demo, but we were already well acquainted with the phenomenon before you saw fit to tediously rehearse it.
Normal conversations aren't something people win or lose, by the way. Since a generator of conflict would be unlikely ever to experience conversation as a mutually rewarding exchange of opinion, I guess this too lies outside your knowledge base, which is too bad. You'll forever be on the outside looking in, making enemies of complete strangers who might otherwise have been your friends. I should feel sorry for you; but you're obviously such a bag of walking fertilizer, casually sticking the Nazi label on people without the least provocation, that it's hard for me to care. If that's one of my limitations, I can live with it; I'm so grateful not to have yours.
So assuming all the terrorists are Muslims just assume all Muslims are terrorists, eliminate all the Muslims, in the process all the terrorists. What of the Muslims that are not terrorists? No one gives a fuck about them anyway.
(?) Since no such assumption is inferable from my post, or required to make sense of it, I'm not sure what the point of your observation is.
If anything, we should look at the fact of human brainwashing. This is so prevalent in all this that to just speak of Islamophobia is only a small example. Christianity is no better and all is an aberrational power structure that is destructive and comes from self hatred.
"Like 'Islamophobia,' a word that attempts to recast a natural aversion to terrorist atrocities ..."
From which it follows Islam = terrorist atrocities.
Clearly, you've never opened a book of logic in your life. No, that conclusion doesn't follow from a claim about how the word 'Islamophobia' is customarily employed. The intent is always to undermine legitimate criticism by pretending it's simply an expression of psychological malady in the critic, a form of ad hominemism that itself is a logical fallacy. The unwillingness of apologists to come to grips with Islam's sad history of terrorist atrocities is the most obvious example, and if your aim here is to speak up on behalf of Islam you might reflect on the fact that this particular evasive tactic hurts primarily Muslims themselves, since statistically they are by far the principal victims of such atrocities.
In any event, this is a side issue. Are you at all interested in the point of the post, which isn't even slightly concerned with Islam or terrorism? People are familiar with the 'Islamophobia' strategy, so referencing it as a conceptual aid to seeing that the 'misinformation' dodge sabotages dialogue in much the same way made sense. Do you care about that little problem--the one of evasion by terminological subterfuge--which at least has the advantage of being relevant to the article to which my post replies?
Right. Islamophobia is disinformation when used in the context of recasting your Islamophobia as an irrational psychological aberration. Brilliant. Let's not call it Islamophobia. Let's call it ... NORMAL !!! Then let's assume they are all terrorists and eliminate them all !!!
So you have neither a sense of logical relevance nor any interest in the forum topic, and your poster handle is an accurate self-description.
You brought up Islamophobia so if anyone has no sense of logical relevance it's you. Stupid Nazi asshole.
That you're gratuitously rude and abusive as well as ignorant was predictable. For the record, I taught logic to undergraduates on the way to getting my M.A. in philosophy... and on the basis of your performance here you would have failed to master even the basic difference between Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens. The odds seem high you'll pass the rest of your life knowing the mysteries of logic only by hearsay.
By all means, though, continue comically (and irrelevantly) bloviating. From each according to his ability.
I make it a point of pride to be rude to Nazis. Those who can do. Those who can't teach. You are living proof. Another logical fallacy prevalent on Nazi sites like this one is as long as you get the last word you win. You are embarrassing yourself but by all means get the last word if you need to. You still lose.
You're living proof that those with a predilection for rudeness will find targets for it, even if they have to manufacture the targets themselves, evidence free. Thanks for the demo, but we were already well acquainted with the phenomenon before you saw fit to tediously rehearse it.
Normal conversations aren't something people win or lose, by the way. Since a generator of conflict would be unlikely ever to experience conversation as a mutually rewarding exchange of opinion, I guess this too lies outside your knowledge base, which is too bad. You'll forever be on the outside looking in, making enemies of complete strangers who might otherwise have been your friends. I should feel sorry for you; but you're obviously such a bag of walking fertilizer, casually sticking the Nazi label on people without the least provocation, that it's hard for me to care. If that's one of my limitations, I can live with it; I'm so grateful not to have yours.