Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ralph's avatar
2hEdited

> a former ACLU legal director, who declared the FACE Act should not apply, provided Cities Church members were not “barred from taking Communion or some other religious activity.” The ACLU has been silent on whether or not the Cities Church action constitutes protected First Amendment speech.

I formerly had a great deal of respect for the ACLU. Now I know, to my chagrin, that the right-wingers were right to mock the ACLU as "the American Criminal Liberties Union."

So this (granted, former) ACLU legal director wants to split hairs by claiming that interrupting the taking of Communion might violate FACE, but that interrupting a pastor's sermon to his flock does not?

And didn't Minnesota's Attorney General Keith Ellison want the DOJ to prosecute people under FACE for filming *outside* Muslim masjids?

It's always Two Tier "Justice" with the Left, it's never what's done but always who is doing it, that determines what is or isn't legal for the Left.

As for Thao, ICE needs to show better discipline and restraint. It's illegal and embarrassing when they fail to get warrants, brak down doors, arrest the wrong people in their underwear. Do the job, but do it professionally and legally.

Trump was elected to *end* the chaos and the misuse of Federal authority.

Chuck750ss's avatar

Why can’t we walk and chew gum at the same time. The treatment of the Hmong man was bad. Apologies should be made. The church thing? How could anyone justify this? Especially public officials. Sick.

41 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?