Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

NBC, ABC, CBS, Reuters, USA Today, AP, BBC, NYT etc spent 2021-2024 denying that the Biden Administration had instituted de facto open borders, that the country had been flooded by millions of unvetted unknown strangers, and claimed that even if some of these masses included criminals and gangbangers, this was a small price to pay for compassion and "our values" (the foremost of which is low-wage labor), and only bigots notice anyway.

Now suddenly NBC, ABC, CBS, Reuters, USA Today, AP, BBC, NYT etc are laser-focused on the migrants they spent years ignoring, cataloging every ICE fuckup and every sob story of a "local man" and his kids who are being sent home, making sure to omit whatever charges he may be facing, and absolutely making sure to omit that 1) there are thousands of criminals here with no papers, and any country would arrest and deport them; 2) they've spent years constantly crowing about Our Democracy™ yet the current Prez, however repulsive, ran and won on this issue and thus is actually fulfilling a campaign promise, however crudely and crassly; and 3) if they are opposed to federal immigration law, Our Democracy™ should run on this, win and change the law.

But the biggest question I have for the owners, editors and mouthpieces of NBC, ABC, CBS, Reuters, USA Today, AP, BBC, NYT etc: how many migrants are you currently housing or sponsoring? How many of your vacation homes and spare bedrooms sit empty while you cry for the plight of the undocumented? How many members of your families have been hurt or worse by an illegal alien criminal?

Our MSM overclass believes only in their divine right to outsource all the costs and social rot, while privatizing all profits and hogging all virtue. Just don't try to make me believe they give a shit about any immigrants, legal or otherwise, unless they're serving them food or scrubbing their toilets. They only want us all to hate and fight each other, for their social and financial benefit. Social collapse is now their newest profit stream!

Ralph's avatar

> a former ACLU legal director, who declared the FACE Act should not apply, provided Cities Church members were not “barred from taking Communion or some other religious activity.” The ACLU has been silent on whether or not the Cities Church action constitutes protected First Amendment speech.

I formerly had a great deal of respect for the ACLU. Now I know, to my chagrin, that the right-wingers were right to mock the ACLU as "the American Criminal Liberties Union."

So this (granted, former) ACLU legal director wants to split hairs by claiming that interrupting the taking of Communion might violate FACE, but that interrupting a pastor's sermon to his flock does not?

And didn't Minnesota's Attorney General Keith Ellison want the DOJ to prosecute people under FACE for filming *outside* Muslim masjids?

It's always Two Tier "Justice" with the Left, it's never what's done but always who is doing it, that determines what is or isn't legal for the Left.

As for Thao, ICE needs to show better discipline and restraint. It's illegal and embarrassing when they fail to get warrants, break down doors, arrest the wrong people in their underwear. Do the job, but do it professionally and legally.

Trump was elected to *end* the chaos and the misuse of Federal authority.

290 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?