Walter's "conspiracy of narrative" discussion makes more sense when put through the lens of (mostly) confirmed conspiracies like O'Neill's CHAOS (which Walter eventually mentioned but should have led with), in which major events and crimes are ultimately revealed to be psyops conducted on the American people, in a manner and for reasons which defy imagination when they're happening.
Walter's "conspiracy of narrative" discussion makes more sense when put through the lens of (mostly) confirmed conspiracies like O'Neill's CHAOS (which Walter eventually mentioned but should have led with), in which major events and crimes are ultimately revealed to be psyops conducted on the American people, in a manner and for reasons which defy imagination when they're happening.
The claim that the CIA/deep state are behind all major events in our country suffer the defect of being non-falsifiable. In that respect, it's like Robin DiAngelo's "White Fragility" - a white person accused of being a racist cannot disprove the claim since denying it is taken as proof that they are in fact racist.
I agree with that-- its their non-falsibility which makes them so successful in shaping opinion and creating distraction. I certainly don't think every (or even a large number) of major events are the work of the deep state. But looking at events from that angle can be revealing, if only to cause us to re-evaluate our own reactions to the information we're being provided.
Walter's "conspiracy of narrative" discussion makes more sense when put through the lens of (mostly) confirmed conspiracies like O'Neill's CHAOS (which Walter eventually mentioned but should have led with), in which major events and crimes are ultimately revealed to be psyops conducted on the American people, in a manner and for reasons which defy imagination when they're happening.
The claim that the CIA/deep state are behind all major events in our country suffer the defect of being non-falsifiable. In that respect, it's like Robin DiAngelo's "White Fragility" - a white person accused of being a racist cannot disprove the claim since denying it is taken as proof that they are in fact racist.
I agree with that-- its their non-falsibility which makes them so successful in shaping opinion and creating distraction. I certainly don't think every (or even a large number) of major events are the work of the deep state. But looking at events from that angle can be revealing, if only to cause us to re-evaluate our own reactions to the information we're being provided.