Dear Harry
Apparently you have not been informed regarding how this works. In matters of formal logic, the one *claiming invalid logic bears the burden of *proof to *demonstrate such logical fallacies as they can find. It is not "on" either me or minitiger to do *shit, but call Jim on his accusations ! So, the joke is that people, appare…
Apparently you have not been informed regarding how this works. In matters of formal logic, the one *claiming invalid logic bears the burden of *proof to *demonstrate such logical fallacies as they can find. It is not "on" either me or minitiger to do *shit, but call Jim on his accusations ! So, the joke is that people, apparently now including you, who know a sum total of LESS than nothing about the field of Formal Logic, want to "trash talk" as if they DO.
Kind of reduces Jim's challenge to the level of loudmouths in a bar claiming knowledge of martial arts. SURE sign that they likely can't even accurately *spell "martial arts". TRUE practitioners of martial arts, to mention nothing of actual masters, don't *SAY shit ! They remain silent until they have no *other choice, and then they *demonstrate their level of skill. This is what we challenged Jim to do. His response to date has been, as you have so colorfully characterized it: *crickets* ! There *is a definite joke *here, but you have egregiously misidentified the source ! ;-D
And, Harry, coherence ? Your post reads like some kind of exotic code !
Um ok, I was calling Jim out on his bullshit same as you. Not sure why you think you have more right to do that than myself. The formatting did come out weird though, with no way to edit and fix. Your pretentiousness, unwarranted, but you do you.
LOL - Wow, I don't respond fast enough for Harry, and it's "crickets." See, Harry, some of us have this thing called a "job." Not all of us have the luxury of spending the entire day proving our moral superiority by insulting others ...
Dear Harry
Apparently you have not been informed regarding how this works. In matters of formal logic, the one *claiming invalid logic bears the burden of *proof to *demonstrate such logical fallacies as they can find. It is not "on" either me or minitiger to do *shit, but call Jim on his accusations ! So, the joke is that people, apparently now including you, who know a sum total of LESS than nothing about the field of Formal Logic, want to "trash talk" as if they DO.
Kind of reduces Jim's challenge to the level of loudmouths in a bar claiming knowledge of martial arts. SURE sign that they likely can't even accurately *spell "martial arts". TRUE practitioners of martial arts, to mention nothing of actual masters, don't *SAY shit ! They remain silent until they have no *other choice, and then they *demonstrate their level of skill. This is what we challenged Jim to do. His response to date has been, as you have so colorfully characterized it: *crickets* ! There *is a definite joke *here, but you have egregiously misidentified the source ! ;-D
And, Harry, coherence ? Your post reads like some kind of exotic code !
Um ok, I was calling Jim out on his bullshit same as you. Not sure why you think you have more right to do that than myself. The formatting did come out weird though, with no way to edit and fix. Your pretentiousness, unwarranted, but you do you.
@Harry
Appreciating your permission, I have no option *but to "do me".
LOL - Wow, I don't respond fast enough for Harry, and it's "crickets." See, Harry, some of us have this thing called a "job." Not all of us have the luxury of spending the entire day proving our moral superiority by insulting others ...
Ohh look at Mr. Fancy pants with his "job"
@Harry
C'mon, Harry, *somebody has to bag the groceries down at the local Piggly Wiggly. ;-D