We are currently in a high-stand, where the relative sea-level rise of the last few thousand years inter-glacial interval is raising much slower but hasn’t flattened. It is highly dishonest - and always done by climate catastrophists - to claim that sea-level rise is necessarily due to anthropogenic melting of the ice caps. Not the menti…
We are currently in a high-stand, where the relative sea-level rise of the last few thousand years inter-glacial interval is raising much slower but hasn’t flattened. It is highly dishonest - and always done by climate catastrophists - to claim that sea-level rise is necessarily due to anthropogenic melting of the ice caps. Not the mention the other commonly used trick, where pseudo-scientific articles ignore high local subsidence due to compaction of thick recent fluvial deposits, such as in the Louisiana coastal area. Even geoscientists like to keep it silent, to milk more money - I’ve seen that personally in action.
We are currently in a high-stand, where the relative sea-level rise of the last few thousand years inter-glacial interval is raising much slower but hasn’t flattened. It is highly dishonest - and always done by climate catastrophists - to claim that sea-level rise is necessarily due to anthropogenic melting of the ice caps. Not the mention the other commonly used trick, where pseudo-scientific articles ignore high local subsidence due to compaction of thick recent fluvial deposits, such as in the Louisiana coastal area. Even geoscientists like to keep it silent, to milk more money - I’ve seen that personally in action.