Also, easily omitted from common sense dialogue is that the Polio Vaccine went through seven years of testing/trials before getting any FDA approval and then it was full approval not Emergency Use. Or that our Government has ever explained to us exactly why Covid vaccines warranted EU use… again, we are to believe they are doing what is …
Also, easily omitted from common sense dialogue is that the Polio Vaccine went through seven years of testing/trials before getting any FDA approval and then it was full approval not Emergency Use. Or that our Government has ever explained to us exactly why Covid vaccines warranted EU use… again, we are to believe they are doing what is best for us but they won’t explain why. A reporter asks Biden about pressuring China as to the origin of COVID and he points at the reporter, laughs and walks away. Unacceptable.
Richard Ebright is on record as saying that documentary evidence of the origins of C-19 is just as easily found in the U.S. as China. At any rate, China told the U.S. and the rest of the world to fuck off more than a year ago regarding the origins of covid. What in the world makes you think that China would reveal the origins of covid to Biden or anyone else for that matter? Maybe Biden and Xi can arm-wrestle over it at the next summit.
You’re good with an arm wrestle, I demand answers. As should we ALL.Then maybe some of these crimes against humanity in general would lessen. Why do go to snark? Try problem solving, that’s why Matt had such a WIDE audience,we’re here to find common ground.
Try problem solving. I demand answers. Crimes against humanity. We're here to find common ground. It's generally considered bad form to make assumptions regarding the motives of strangers. You say you're here to find common ground. That's both fine for you and irrelevant to me.
I point out that Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, and one of the world's leading experts on laboratory gain-of-function experiments, has repeatedly stated for more than a year that DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF THE ORIGINS OF C-19 IS JUST AS EASILY FOUND IN THE U.S. AS CHINA. One might construe this information as at least an attempt at "problem solving," but my purpose here is not to solve problems. In my opinion that's not what a comment section is for, but if you believe otherwise I defer to you.
Ebright may be correct and he may not be. What he has been doing, primarily, is dropping coy hints and signaling to potential investigators that there is evidence here in the U.S. if anyone cares to go after it and dig, and that if the Chinese insist on stonewalling indefinitely there's not a damn thing we can do about it. Keep in mind that this is a global superpower, not a local municipality that might otherwise be successfully "pressured" into coughing up some "answers."
If Ebright is correct, then one can assume that many others are aware of this also, including those in both the U.S. scientific community and the Biden administration, including the president himself. But assuming you are accurately framing the interaction between the reporter and Biden, the reporter's question by any measure is extraordinarily obtuse.
It's unclear, actually, what you find unacceptable. The reporter's callow and obtuse question to the president? Or that the head of another global superpower would smile and walk away from such a callow and obtuse question, a question absurdly inappropriate for that forum? A question, given the sensitive and politically charged topic, that is clearly not going to be answered in such a forum? By the president or anyone else?
And if you do believe that this forum is appropriate for an American president to be asked by a reporter why he isn't pressuring the Chinese for an answer on such a politically sensitive and controversial topic, one that has enormous global ramifications and repercussions, then it's best to be prepared to be disappointed. And if you're someone who in that moment "demands answers," well, I don't think I can help you here.
My "snark," as you call it, is in my opinion reliably proportional to both your obtuseness and and clumsy presumptions.
Also, easily omitted from common sense dialogue is that the Polio Vaccine went through seven years of testing/trials before getting any FDA approval and then it was full approval not Emergency Use. Or that our Government has ever explained to us exactly why Covid vaccines warranted EU use… again, we are to believe they are doing what is best for us but they won’t explain why. A reporter asks Biden about pressuring China as to the origin of COVID and he points at the reporter, laughs and walks away. Unacceptable.
Richard Ebright is on record as saying that documentary evidence of the origins of C-19 is just as easily found in the U.S. as China. At any rate, China told the U.S. and the rest of the world to fuck off more than a year ago regarding the origins of covid. What in the world makes you think that China would reveal the origins of covid to Biden or anyone else for that matter? Maybe Biden and Xi can arm-wrestle over it at the next summit.
You’re good with an arm wrestle, I demand answers. As should we ALL.Then maybe some of these crimes against humanity in general would lessen. Why do go to snark? Try problem solving, that’s why Matt had such a WIDE audience,we’re here to find common ground.
Try problem solving. I demand answers. Crimes against humanity. We're here to find common ground. It's generally considered bad form to make assumptions regarding the motives of strangers. You say you're here to find common ground. That's both fine for you and irrelevant to me.
I point out that Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, and one of the world's leading experts on laboratory gain-of-function experiments, has repeatedly stated for more than a year that DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF THE ORIGINS OF C-19 IS JUST AS EASILY FOUND IN THE U.S. AS CHINA. One might construe this information as at least an attempt at "problem solving," but my purpose here is not to solve problems. In my opinion that's not what a comment section is for, but if you believe otherwise I defer to you.
Ebright may be correct and he may not be. What he has been doing, primarily, is dropping coy hints and signaling to potential investigators that there is evidence here in the U.S. if anyone cares to go after it and dig, and that if the Chinese insist on stonewalling indefinitely there's not a damn thing we can do about it. Keep in mind that this is a global superpower, not a local municipality that might otherwise be successfully "pressured" into coughing up some "answers."
If Ebright is correct, then one can assume that many others are aware of this also, including those in both the U.S. scientific community and the Biden administration, including the president himself. But assuming you are accurately framing the interaction between the reporter and Biden, the reporter's question by any measure is extraordinarily obtuse.
It's unclear, actually, what you find unacceptable. The reporter's callow and obtuse question to the president? Or that the head of another global superpower would smile and walk away from such a callow and obtuse question, a question absurdly inappropriate for that forum? A question, given the sensitive and politically charged topic, that is clearly not going to be answered in such a forum? By the president or anyone else?
And if you do believe that this forum is appropriate for an American president to be asked by a reporter why he isn't pressuring the Chinese for an answer on such a politically sensitive and controversial topic, one that has enormous global ramifications and repercussions, then it's best to be prepared to be disappointed. And if you're someone who in that moment "demands answers," well, I don't think I can help you here.
My "snark," as you call it, is in my opinion reliably proportional to both your obtuseness and and clumsy presumptions.