I have not carefully read every report from the IPCC. I have read much of it and much about it. I am not a climate scientist. I don't pretend to be able to go through the raw information and make assertions. But once experts have debated and their arguments are clear, I can use my solid math and science skills to determine which points are valid which are not.
The IPCC baseline assumption as that coal will be the predominant fuel for the rest of the century, including powering cars. This underlying mistake, which they are aware of, makes all of their projections overblown. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abcdd2
What does peer reviewed even mean any more? If the powers that be want it to be a certain way, all those that get funding through them will say what they want.
Have you carefully read the full IPCC reports? Or just the Executive Summary which is not peer reviewed.
I have not carefully read every report from the IPCC. I have read much of it and much about it. I am not a climate scientist. I don't pretend to be able to go through the raw information and make assertions. But once experts have debated and their arguments are clear, I can use my solid math and science skills to determine which points are valid which are not.
The IPCC baseline assumption as that coal will be the predominant fuel for the rest of the century, including powering cars. This underlying mistake, which they are aware of, makes all of their projections overblown. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abcdd2
What does peer reviewed even mean any more? If the powers that be want it to be a certain way, all those that get funding through them will say what they want.