When the bell rings and fighters are supposed to go to their corners, but one fighter follows the other and keeps pounding, it's no longer boxing. Is the second boxer expected to not notice or react? And when that same boxer whips out a knife and starts stabbing, after announcing he is no longer going to follow the rules, he admits he was taking advantage of the pretense of playing fair.
When the bell rings and fighters are supposed to go to their corners, but one fighter follows the other and keeps pounding, it's no longer boxing. Is the second boxer expected to not notice or react? And when that same boxer whips out a knife and starts stabbing, after announcing he is no longer going to follow the rules, he admits he was taking advantage of the pretense of playing fair.
All of the participamnts on the Ukrainian side admitted that Minsk (which Ukraine immedaitely broke) and Minsk-2 (which Ukraine never fulfilled a single condition of) were shams intended to benefit Ukraine.
Putin signed them, expecting the agreements to be abided by, when Ukraine violated the terms and the guarantors, France and Germany, never fulfilled their part of the agreement, what would you expect Russia to do, wait for the NATO missile launchers to be on his border before doing anything? Your problem is that you aren't following anything but neocon/neoliberal/NATO logic and programming, you still believe the lies you've been told, a little critical thinking would go a long way.
When the bell rings and fighters are supposed to go to their corners, but one fighter follows the other and keeps pounding, it's no longer boxing. Is the second boxer expected to not notice or react? And when that same boxer whips out a knife and starts stabbing, after announcing he is no longer going to follow the rules, he admits he was taking advantage of the pretense of playing fair.
Excpet that isn't what happened, and you know it.
All of the participamnts on the Ukrainian side admitted that Minsk (which Ukraine immedaitely broke) and Minsk-2 (which Ukraine never fulfilled a single condition of) were shams intended to benefit Ukraine.
Shams to benefit Ukraine but Putin signed them? Putin uses every agreement to advance his imperial plans. That's why he can no longer be trusted.
Putin signed them, expecting the agreements to be abided by, when Ukraine violated the terms and the guarantors, France and Germany, never fulfilled their part of the agreement, what would you expect Russia to do, wait for the NATO missile launchers to be on his border before doing anything? Your problem is that you aren't following anything but neocon/neoliberal/NATO logic and programming, you still believe the lies you've been told, a little critical thinking would go a long way.
Up your stinking moronic butt hole, LaVerne. Sorry, I have to disagree with your assessment. Have a nice day.