But just like with Qanon's claims, there's been no credible evidence presented that the election was stolen. 61 judges, including judges appointed by Trump, threw their claims out of court. His own justice department and homeland security departments said there was no evidence of fraud. So what is it you're tired of putting up with, and why should the rest of us be sympathetic?
But just like with Qanon's claims, there's been no credible evidence presented that the election was stolen. 61 judges, including judges appointed by Trump, threw their claims out of court. His own justice department and homeland security departments said there was no evidence of fraud. So what is it you're tired of putting up with, and why should the rest of us be sympathetic?
«His own justice department and homeland security departments said there was no evidence of fraud.»
Of all the examples of delusional propaganda this is particularly laughable: how can one claim that the security and justice were Trump's own, to the readers of "TK News" that has amply documented how both kept backstabbing Trump for years, with titles like "The Color Revolutions Come Home", "We're in a permanent coup", "The intelligence community needs a house-cleaning", ...
I know, I know, it's like Trump says: everyone who disagrees with him is part of the deep state, even his own appointees, even his own vice president. So what if we have governmental agencies in charge of investigating the facts?--if they say the facts are against Trump, then they are by definition deep state liars. 2+2=5, or whatever Trump now says it is. Go ahead and have your final say and let's end this conversation.
You seem not to understand that a newly-elected President says "Jump" and the institutions which predate him immediately say "How high?" That's how it's supposed to work, right?
And this leads to an important point: when candidates were chosen by "the machine" in "smoke filled rooms" instead of primaries they tended to be experienced "machine politicians", people with their own power base in both politics and the federal administration. Since primaries the presidential candidates tend to be inexperienced "looks presidential" people without any power base in their own party, never mind experience or a power based in the federal administration, and they tend to be more ex-governors than ex-senators or ex-representatives. People like J Carter or R Reagan, or more recently BH Obama (or B Clinton or GW Bush) who are pretty much PR figures. GH Bush had his own power base in government, but not in politics. That's why "machine" people like Cheney or Rumsfeld had so much influence.
J Biden looks like a partial exception, for he has a long experience in politics and in part in the federal administration, but he has no faction of his own, he has always been a lightweight, and is so obviously currently just fronting for the "New Democrat" faction just like B Clinton and BH Obama did.
"J Biden looks like a partial exception, for he has a long experience in politics and in part in the federal administration, but he has no faction of his own, he has always been a lightweight"
I still don't know WTF the actual puppet masters think they are achieving with Biden; to me he looks incredibly, obviously weak.
I'm reaching Philip K. Dick levels of paranoia here. Either the people in charge are inept fools scrambling for a temporary handhold at the edge of a cliff, or they are secret geniuses playing nth-dimensional chess. I don't see a middle-of-the-road explanation.
Tell me one Judge slick that looked at the evidence.
Zero. No court considered hearing the evidence, slick.
We are all informed we have no standing.
Slick.
Judges that refuse hearings are not the same as judges that consider the evidence then reject the evidence.
There are hundreds of affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury about the fraud, as well as the youtube videos, as well as everyone who has a TV saw the count mysteriously halt at 1030 PM in the swing states with Trump ahead, then at 3 am Biden immediately leaped ahead by a huge influx of votes.
But you already know all that, slick.
Then at the first sign of any real dissent you PANICKED and your Pretender was sworn in at gunpoint, with the guns facing the nation. > and here fools you drew the sword, and the only person killed or who had or used a gun was the thug with a badge who shot Ashli Babbitt.
In short slick, you stole an election, killed to protect the theft and ringed the Capitol with troops to ensure Biden was sworn in. Along the way you informed the people your vote doesn’t count, and they have no standing before the law.
You are a liar slick, and now you have killed, and now you have drawn the sword.
No judges looked at the "evidence" because Trump's lawyers didn't bring any, they brought only frivolous conspiracy theories. They were reprimanded by Trump appointed judges for wasting the court's time. The claims that swing states mysteriously stopped the count at 10:30 have been debunked (see Politifact, Reuters etc), as have all the other claims (see for instance https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/nine-election-fraud-claims-none-credible/). But people who believe in conspiracy theories are never phased by debunking and fact checking, they'll just keep coming up with new claims to support their narrative.
If you have a link to evidence of hundreds of affidavits about the fraud, please give me the link, I'd like to see whether they've been debunked or not. And please explain, since the Democrats (and all those Republican election officials in swing states) went to all this trouble to steal the election, why they didn't also steal the election for the Democratic senate candidates who were on the same ballot?
"better 1000 Bradley Butterfields then Jew haters like the long warred. You will be replaced you scumbag"
Whoa! This is the kind of Troll Fight shit I live for. If I were a worthwhile entrepreneur, like Vince McMahon, I would readily hit "the long warred" over the head with folding metal chair and call it a day. $$$
"In fact our only possible replacement would be the Spanish."
Pretty sure the Spanish just want to stay up late, drink wine and eat tapas at this point. Running an empire is fucking exhausting; it takes a few hundred years to get past the hangover.
The Brits are still all fucked up. I fear for my fellow Americans. Sometimes you have to swallow a lot of aspirins and spend all day in bed.
America i.e the great assimilation engine is more or less working here , mostly because they spanish work. I mean LATAM of course. Work is the great american assimilation engine.
Michael Barone had it right a few years ago when he said the Spanish are very similar to the Italian immigrants in starting point and desired outcomes, family, etc.
"I voted for Trump twice and I totally disagree with him in both in fact and opinion."
This is a remarkable statement. I do not intend my own response to be negative or condescending in any way. I think your rationale may go some way towards explaining Trump's "inexplicable" electoral popularity, and if you wish to explain further, I hope you will do so.
But just like with Qanon's claims, there's been no credible evidence presented that the election was stolen. 61 judges, including judges appointed by Trump, threw their claims out of court. His own justice department and homeland security departments said there was no evidence of fraud. So what is it you're tired of putting up with, and why should the rest of us be sympathetic?
«His own justice department and homeland security departments said there was no evidence of fraud.»
Of all the examples of delusional propaganda this is particularly laughable: how can one claim that the security and justice were Trump's own, to the readers of "TK News" that has amply documented how both kept backstabbing Trump for years, with titles like "The Color Revolutions Come Home", "We're in a permanent coup", "The intelligence community needs a house-cleaning", ...
I know, I know, it's like Trump says: everyone who disagrees with him is part of the deep state, even his own appointees, even his own vice president. So what if we have governmental agencies in charge of investigating the facts?--if they say the facts are against Trump, then they are by definition deep state liars. 2+2=5, or whatever Trump now says it is. Go ahead and have your final say and let's end this conversation.
You seem not to understand that a newly-elected President says "Jump" and the institutions which predate him immediately say "How high?" That's how it's supposed to work, right?
JFK barely said "jump." It was more like "hop."
And this leads to an important point: when candidates were chosen by "the machine" in "smoke filled rooms" instead of primaries they tended to be experienced "machine politicians", people with their own power base in both politics and the federal administration. Since primaries the presidential candidates tend to be inexperienced "looks presidential" people without any power base in their own party, never mind experience or a power based in the federal administration, and they tend to be more ex-governors than ex-senators or ex-representatives. People like J Carter or R Reagan, or more recently BH Obama (or B Clinton or GW Bush) who are pretty much PR figures. GH Bush had his own power base in government, but not in politics. That's why "machine" people like Cheney or Rumsfeld had so much influence.
J Biden looks like a partial exception, for he has a long experience in politics and in part in the federal administration, but he has no faction of his own, he has always been a lightweight, and is so obviously currently just fronting for the "New Democrat" faction just like B Clinton and BH Obama did.
"J Biden looks like a partial exception, for he has a long experience in politics and in part in the federal administration, but he has no faction of his own, he has always been a lightweight"
I still don't know WTF the actual puppet masters think they are achieving with Biden; to me he looks incredibly, obviously weak.
I'm reaching Philip K. Dick levels of paranoia here. Either the people in charge are inept fools scrambling for a temporary handhold at the edge of a cliff, or they are secret geniuses playing nth-dimensional chess. I don't see a middle-of-the-road explanation.
Commenting here is a waste of time that would be better spent playing pool.
Yet here you and I are doing it.
Rack 'em up?
Tell me one Judge slick that looked at the evidence.
Zero. No court considered hearing the evidence, slick.
We are all informed we have no standing.
Slick.
Judges that refuse hearings are not the same as judges that consider the evidence then reject the evidence.
There are hundreds of affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury about the fraud, as well as the youtube videos, as well as everyone who has a TV saw the count mysteriously halt at 1030 PM in the swing states with Trump ahead, then at 3 am Biden immediately leaped ahead by a huge influx of votes.
But you already know all that, slick.
Then at the first sign of any real dissent you PANICKED and your Pretender was sworn in at gunpoint, with the guns facing the nation. > and here fools you drew the sword, and the only person killed or who had or used a gun was the thug with a badge who shot Ashli Babbitt.
In short slick, you stole an election, killed to protect the theft and ringed the Capitol with troops to ensure Biden was sworn in. Along the way you informed the people your vote doesn’t count, and they have no standing before the law.
You are a liar slick, and now you have killed, and now you have drawn the sword.
You must be confusing us with the West Bank.
We’re not.
No judges looked at the "evidence" because Trump's lawyers didn't bring any, they brought only frivolous conspiracy theories. They were reprimanded by Trump appointed judges for wasting the court's time. The claims that swing states mysteriously stopped the count at 10:30 have been debunked (see Politifact, Reuters etc), as have all the other claims (see for instance https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/nine-election-fraud-claims-none-credible/). But people who believe in conspiracy theories are never phased by debunking and fact checking, they'll just keep coming up with new claims to support their narrative.
If you have a link to evidence of hundreds of affidavits about the fraud, please give me the link, I'd like to see whether they've been debunked or not. And please explain, since the Democrats (and all those Republican election officials in swing states) went to all this trouble to steal the election, why they didn't also steal the election for the Democratic senate candidates who were on the same ballot?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/king-v-whitmer/
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf
the above a small sample BB, but unlike factcheck.org sworn under penalty of perjury.
what's funny is the Dominion software if the damn Dems had read the manual would have let them do all this in the background.
Here you are , the Dominion user manual. The good stuff is in chapter 3 - like adjudication, rank choice voting, etc.
https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/DVS-DemocracySuite511/documentation/2-03-EMS-FunctionalityDescription-5-11-CO.pdf
"better 1000 Bradley Butterfields then Jew haters like the long warred. You will be replaced you scumbag"
Whoa! This is the kind of Troll Fight shit I live for. If I were a worthwhile entrepreneur, like Vince McMahon, I would readily hit "the long warred" over the head with folding metal chair and call it a day. $$$
Who said I was a Jew Hater? I just pointed out this isn't the West Bank.
Apparently that observation hit home.
As far as being replaced...yes, nothing genocidal there...yes we've heard that one before... we may be replaced, but not by you.
In fact our only possible replacement would be the Spanish.
Who are far and away the most Supremacists Whites in America, and has for ah the Question...oh my goodness.
It's probably not a good idea to replace us.
But I don't hate. I just understand. The middle east was most instructive, suddenly there's context.
Cheers !
"In fact our only possible replacement would be the Spanish."
Pretty sure the Spanish just want to stay up late, drink wine and eat tapas at this point. Running an empire is fucking exhausting; it takes a few hundred years to get past the hangover.
The Brits are still all fucked up. I fear for my fellow Americans. Sometimes you have to swallow a lot of aspirins and spend all day in bed.
America i.e the great assimilation engine is more or less working here , mostly because they spanish work. I mean LATAM of course. Work is the great american assimilation engine.
Michael Barone had it right a few years ago when he said the Spanish are very similar to the Italian immigrants in starting point and desired outcomes, family, etc.
"I voted for Trump twice and I totally disagree with him in both in fact and opinion."
This is a remarkable statement. I do not intend my own response to be negative or condescending in any way. I think your rationale may go some way towards explaining Trump's "inexplicable" electoral popularity, and if you wish to explain further, I hope you will do so.