Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sea Sentry's avatar

I struggle with this one. Politicians of both parties routinely use insider information, their public persona and political contacts to enrich themselves. It’s a pathetic interpretation of “public service” but that’s how it is. George Washington did real estate deals throughout his presidency. So Trump isn’t breaking new ground, but that doesn’t make it any less unseemly and distasteful to me. This is especially true when Trump acts as a spokesperson for his family businesses, even if they are in a blind trust (as they should be).

Why don’t we clean all this up and make public service a temporary stint and not a career? Oh, that’s right-Congress would have to vote on it. Of course, Congress could stabilize Social Security, pass immigration reform and increase government transparency. They do none of these things that all Americans want. They blame each other for everything, work you into a lather so you’ll send them money, and build massive wealth for themselves with our system of legal grift.

Expand full comment
ktrip's avatar

We have a thing in the code of legal ethics or professional responsibility (Laugh if you want, it was important to me, and I was taught by a preeminent legal ethics professor) called the "appearance of impropriety." Even if this is all technically legal, it sure has the appearance of impropriety. And I say this as largely a Trump supporter (I am a JD Vance guy).

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts