I'm interested in the science of climatology, and the strength of the arguments made by the scientists, so I'm not interested in an analysis of who is funding opposing (AGW) viewpoints. It's obvious that skeptics won't receive dollar one from the government, which is where the problem begins. The field has been corrupted by politics.
I'm interested in the science of climatology, and the strength of the arguments made by the scientists, so I'm not interested in an analysis of who is funding opposing (AGW) viewpoints. It's obvious that skeptics won't receive dollar one from the government, which is where the problem begins. The field has been corrupted by politics.