You know, I (like most, maybe all, of us here) have long since been convinced of the reality of not only the Biden crime family (one of many such Dem outfits, and a few Reps too), but even more important the existence a growing anti-Capitalist, anti-individual-freedom, and therefore anti- Constitution "deep State."
It's almost as if I want to say, "More evidence? I don't need no *more* stinkin' evidence!"
But how do we reach the ones so in the Statist (by far mainly Democrat) tank? How do we put this overwhelming evidence into their closed off awareness? Persistance?
I think too many have been captured by the collectivist mindset that Capitalism (Classical Liberalism) is the root of the problem, and will not listen no matter the reality.
Iow, the *real* problem is not the hegemon's power or corruption, but that too many peeps' hearts are filled with anti-Capitalism, and I know you know I'm not talking about Fascist crony-capitalism.
I think we need to pick them off one at a time with a simple message that for them is impossible to ignore and starts the questioning process.
I have helped open a number of peoples eyes and minds by finding messages that they could not ignore. One example is that I have been able to convince several using materials from Hunter's laptop that relate directly to an issue that is relevant to them.
Joe, Hunter, the Democrats and much of the press continue to try to pretend that Hunter was not selling influence. However, when Burisma's President wrote to Hunter after their talk he made it absolutely clear that he wanted to buy "influence" .
When Hunter's team responded with a very expensive proposal detailing a lot of fluffy tasks and such Burisma wrote back saying that they understood what vague language and such and it was OK "so long as everyone understood the real purpose"
тАЬthe first thing is that the suggested scope of work is largely lacking concrete tangible results that we set out to achieve in the first place, mostly focusing on the process. Also, it doesn't offer any names of top US officials here in Ukraine (for instance, US Ambassador) or Ukrainian officials (the President of Ukraine, chief of staff, Prosecutor General) as key targets for improving Nikolay's case and his situation in Ukraine.
If, however, this is done deliberately to be on the safe and cautious side, I can understand the rationale. And if all parties in fact understand the true purpose of the BS engagement and all our joint efforts, it's ok and we should proceed immediately. тАЬ
Thanks, again, Steve.
You know, I (like most, maybe all, of us here) have long since been convinced of the reality of not only the Biden crime family (one of many such Dem outfits, and a few Reps too), but even more important the existence a growing anti-Capitalist, anti-individual-freedom, and therefore anti- Constitution "deep State."
It's almost as if I want to say, "More evidence? I don't need no *more* stinkin' evidence!"
But how do we reach the ones so in the Statist (by far mainly Democrat) tank? How do we put this overwhelming evidence into their closed off awareness? Persistance?
I think too many have been captured by the collectivist mindset that Capitalism (Classical Liberalism) is the root of the problem, and will not listen no matter the reality.
Iow, the *real* problem is not the hegemon's power or corruption, but that too many peeps' hearts are filled with anti-Capitalism, and I know you know I'm not talking about Fascist crony-capitalism.
I think we need to pick them off one at a time with a simple message that for them is impossible to ignore and starts the questioning process.
I have helped open a number of peoples eyes and minds by finding messages that they could not ignore. One example is that I have been able to convince several using materials from Hunter's laptop that relate directly to an issue that is relevant to them.
Oh, man, I love hearing that. Keep up the good work!
Joe, Hunter, the Democrats and much of the press continue to try to pretend that Hunter was not selling influence. However, when Burisma's President wrote to Hunter after their talk he made it absolutely clear that he wanted to buy "influence" .
When Hunter's team responded with a very expensive proposal detailing a lot of fluffy tasks and such Burisma wrote back saying that they understood what vague language and such and it was OK "so long as everyone understood the real purpose"
https://bidenlaptopemails.com/biden-emails/email.php?id=20140512-112124_86987
11-02-2015. Burisma responds to the proposal from Hunter and Partners
https://bidenlaptopemails.com/biden-emails/email.php?id=20151102-183551_69528
тАЬthe first thing is that the suggested scope of work is largely lacking concrete tangible results that we set out to achieve in the first place, mostly focusing on the process. Also, it doesn't offer any names of top US officials here in Ukraine (for instance, US Ambassador) or Ukrainian officials (the President of Ukraine, chief of staff, Prosecutor General) as key targets for improving Nikolay's case and his situation in Ukraine.
If, however, this is done deliberately to be on the safe and cautious side, I can understand the rationale. And if all parties in fact understand the true purpose of the BS engagement and all our joint efforts, it's ok and we should proceed immediately. тАЬ