Many actual Marxists (and I have studied those writers other than Davis, though I wouldn't call myself a Marxist) reject so-called neo-Marxists. But the characters we're talking about are clearly as shallow as you hilariously accuse me of being. I judge them by their actions. What do you have to prove they are Marxists? Zilch, apparently. You just slap that label on them as if that's the end of the argument.
In brief, I suggest we end this exchange to spare you further embarrassment.
Many actual Marxists (and I have studied those writers other than Davis, though I wouldn't call myself a Marxist) reject so-called neo-Marxists. But the characters we're talking about are clearly as shallow as you hilariously accuse me of being. I judge them by their actions. What do you have to prove they are Marxists? Zilch, apparently. You just slap that label on them as if that's the end of the argument.
In brief, I suggest we end this exchange to spare you further embarrassment.
Similarly you are judged and found wanting. I dont have to prove you wrong, you have to prove yourself right.
Vote with your feet as your character and competency dictate. You are not empowered to vote with mine.
Where do you feel the risk of embarassment lies?